Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integration and comparison of algorithmic weight of evidence and logistic regression in landslide susceptibility mapping of the Orumba North erosion-prone region, Nigeria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent times, weight of evidence (WoE) and logistic regression (LR) methods in GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) have been remarked reliable, providing larger areal coverage. This paper aims to integrate and compare the performances of WoE and LR methods in LSM of the Orumba North Region in southeastern Nigeria. This study approach has not been implemented in Nigeria before. To perform the LSM in the region, eleven unique conditioning factors (elevation, slope degree, slope aspect, plan curvature, distance from road, topographic wetness index, rainfall, stream power index, land cover, distance from road, and geology) were considered, using 107 landslide inventories. These factors were selected based on the environmental characteristics and data availability. Five vulnerable zones were produced after reclassifying each conditioning element based on WoE into different classes: very low, low, medium, high, and very high. Furthermore, the LR mapping also reclassified the eleven factors into five landslide zones. The WoE and LR methods indicated that most parts of the area are characterized by moderate to very high landslide risks. Explicitly, the southern part of the region has higher risk of landslide occurrence whereas the northern part is dominated by low to very low susceptibility. Area under curve (AUC) values were used to validate the model performance and reliability. For training dataset, the AUC values obtained for the WoE and the LR were 0.986 and 0.992, and 0.995 and 0.998 for testing dataset, respectively. It was indicated that both models performed excellently and promise to be reliable. However, the LR slightly outperformed the WoE. This paper provides baseline information on the application of WoE and LR for landslide assessment in Nigeria and also provides insights for effective disaster management and land-use planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  • Agterberg FP, Cheng Q (2002) Conditional independence test for weights-of-evidence modeling. Nat Resour Res 11:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsabhan A, Singh K, Sharma A, Alam S, Pandey DD, Rahman S, Khursheed A, Munshi F (2021) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Himalayan range based along Kasauli–Parwanoo road corridor using weight of evidence, information value, and frequency ratio. J King Saud Univ - Sci 34:101759

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnous M (2011) Integrated remote sensing and GIS techniques for landslide hazard zonation: a case study Wadi Watier area, South Sinai. Egypt J Coast Conserv 15(4):477–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Massari R (1998) Generalized linear modelling of susceptibility to land sliding in the central Apennines, Italy. Computing Geosciences 24:373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Awawdeh MM, ElMughrabi MA, Atallah MY (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from North Jordan. Environ Earth Sci 77:732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7910-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai S-B, Wang J, Lü G-N, Zhou P-G, Hou S-S, Xu S-N (2010) GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 115:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J, Martin Y, Franklin SE (2003) Detecting translational landslide scars using segmentation of Landsat ETM+ and DEM data in the northern Cascade Mountains. British Columbia Can J Remote Sens 29(4):510–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A Physically Based, Variable Contributing Area Model of Basin Hydrology. Un modèle à base physique de zone d’appel variable de l’hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic Information System for Geoscientists: modelling with GIS. Computer methods in the geosciences, vol 13. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bopche L, Rege PP (2022) Landslide susceptibility mapping: an integrated approach using geographic information value, remote sensing, and weight of evidence method. Geotech Geol Eng 40:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bopche L, Rege P, Joshi R (2022) Landslide susceptibility mapping: an integrated approach using knowledge-based numerical rating scheme, remote sensing, and multiple overlay analysis. J Appl Remote Sens 16(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt TP, Butcher DP (1986) Development of topographic indices for use in semidistributed hillslope runoff models, in Geomorphology and Land Management, Edited by D. Baltenau and O. Slaymaker. Z Geomorphol Suppl 58:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitani M, Ribolini A, Bini M (2013) The slope aspect: a predisposing factor for landsliding? CR Geosci 345(11–12):427–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza EJM (2004) Weights of evidence modelling of mineral potential: a case study using small number of prospects, Abra, Philippines. Nat Resour Res 13:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimidi G, Raghuvanshi TK, Suryabhagavan KV (2017) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation in and around Gimbi town, western Ethiopia—a GIS-based statistical approach. Appl Geomat 9(4):219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J, Westen CJ, Frattini P, Cascini LJ, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Eeckhaut M, Mavrouli O, Agliardi F, Pitilakis K, Winter M, Pastor M, Ferlisi S, Tofani V, Hervàs J, Smith JT (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:209–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahigamuwa T, Yu Q, Gunaratne M (2016) Feasibility study of land cover classification based on normalized difference vegetation index for landslide risk assessment. Geosciences 6(4):45

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 43(3):381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Egboka BCE, Okpoko EI (1984) Gully erosion in the Agulu-Nanka region of Anambra State, Nigeria. In: Challenges in African hydrology and water resources (proceedings of the Harare symposium, July 1984). IAHS Publication Oxfordshire UK no. 144

  • Egbueri JC (2021) Use of joint supervised machine learning algorithms in assessing the geotechnical peculiarities of erodible tropical soils from southeastern Nigeria. Geomech Geoengin. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.2006803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbueri JC, Igwe O (2020) The impact of hydrogeomorphological characteristics on gullying processes in erosion-prone geological units in parts of southeast Nigeria. Geol Ecol Landsc. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2020.1711637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbueri JC, Igwe O, Unigwe CO (2021) Gully slope distribution characteristics and stability analysis for soil erosion risk ranking in parts of southeastern Nigeria: a case study. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09605-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbueri JC, Igwe O, Ifediegwu SI (2022) Erosion risk mapping of Anambra State in southeastern Nigeria: soil loss estimation by RUSLE model and geoinformatics. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02589-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekwenye OC, Nichols GJ, Collinson M, Nwajide CS, Obi GC (2014) A paleogeographic model for the sandstone members of the Imo Shale, South Eastern Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 96:190–211

    Google Scholar 

  • EMDAT (2007) Reports the international disaster database: the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED)

  • Fell R, Whitt G, Miner A, Flentje PN (2007) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Aust Geomech J 42(1):13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning, on behalf of the JTC-1 joint technical committee on Landslides and engineered slopes. Eng Geol 102:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli M, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2008) Comparing landslide inventory maps. Geomorphology 94(3–4):268–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemitzi A, Falalakis G, Eskioglou P, Petalas C (2011) Evaluating landslide susceptibility using environmental factors, fuzzy membership functions and GIS. Global NEST J 13(1):28–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma F, Raghuvanshi TK, Ayenew T, Hailemariam T (2015) Landslide hazard zonation in Ada Berga district, Central Ethiopia—a GIS based statistical approach. J Geomat 9(1):25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski P, Jankowski P (2010) An optimized solution of multi-criteria evaluation analysis of landslide susceptibility using fuzzy sets and Kalman filter. Comput Geosci 36:1005–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Alberto C et al (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31(1):181–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Rossi M, Valigi D (2009) Landslide volumes and landslide mobilization rates in Umbria, central Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 279(3–4):222–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Igwe O (2017) The hydrogeological attributes and mechanisms of a receding sedimentary terrain in the Anambra Basin, Southern Nigeria. Environ Earth Sci 76(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Igwe O, Egbueri JC (2018) The characteristics and the erodibility potentials of soils from different geologic formations in Anambra State, Southeastern Nigeria. J Geol Soc India 92(4):471–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-1044-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Igwe O, Egbueri JC (2018) The characteristics and the erodibility potentials of soils from different geologic formations in Anambra State, Southeastern Nigeria. J Geol Soc India 92:471–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Igwe O, Una CO (2019) Landslide impacts and management in Nanka area, Southeast Nigeria. Geoenviron Dis 6:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-019-0122-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilanloo M (2011) A comparative study of fuzzy logic approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS: an experience of Karaj dam basin in Iran. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 19:668–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using the weight of evidence method in the Tinau watershed, Nepal. Nat Hazards 63:479–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Anbalagan RJ (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Tehri Reservoir Rim Region, Uttarakhand. J Geol Soc India 87:271–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data journals. Int J Remote Sens 26:1477–1491

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Jeon SW, Oh K-Y, Lee M-J (2016) The spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility applying artificial neural network and logistic regression models: a case study of Inje, Korea. Open Geosci 8:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Li AG, Yue ZQ, Tham LG, Lee CF, Law KT (2005) Field-monitored variations of soil moisture and matric suction in a saprolite slope. Can Geotech J 42:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew J, Jha VK, Rawat GS (2007) Weights of evidence modelling for landslide hazard zonation mapping in part of Bhagirathi Valley, Uttarakhand. Curr Sci 92(5):628–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard S (1995) Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in social sciences, vol 106. Thousand Oaks, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SZ, Kavian A, Soleimani K, Mousavi SR, Shirzadi A (2011) GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using logistic regression model. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 2:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwajide CS (1980) Eocene tidal sedimentation in the Anambra Basin, southern Nigeria. Sed Geol 25:189–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwajide CS (2013) Geology of Nigerian’s sedimentary basins. CSS Press, Nigerian, pp 311–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwajide CS, Reijers TJA (1997) Sequence architecture of the Campanian Nkporo and the Eocene Nanka formations of the Anambra Basin, Nigeria. Bull Niger Assoc Pet Explor 2:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwajide SC (1977) Sedimentology and stratigraphy of the Nank sand. M.Phil. thesis, Dept. of Geology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka

  • Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69(3):331–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Okagbue CO (1992) The 1988 Nanka landslide, Anambra state. Nigeria Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 46:79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozioko OH, Igwe O (2019) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using heuristic and bivariate statistical methods for Iva Valley and environs, Southeast Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7951-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic, and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38:301–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Oh H-J, Buchroithner M (2010) Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 1(3):199–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuvanshi TK, Ibrahim J, Ayalew D (2014) Slope stability susceptibility evaluation parameter (SSEP) rating scheme—an approach for landslide hazard zonation. J Afr Earth Sci 99:595–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuvanshi TK, Negassa L, Kala PM (2015) GIS based grid overlay method versus modeling approach—a comparative study for landslide hazard zonation (LHZ) in Meta Robi District of west Showa zone in Ethiopia, Egypt. J Remote Sens Space Sci 18:235–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh V, Anbazhagan S (2015) Landslide susceptibility assessment along Kohli hills Ghat road section India using frequency ratio, relative effect and fuzzy logic models. Environ Earth Sci 73(12):8009–8021

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010) Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 115:172–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K et al (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7:725–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud BD, Mihir M, Guzzetti F (2018) A review of statistically based landslide susceptibility models. Earth Sci Rev 180:60–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyment RA (1965) Aspects of geology of Nigeria: the stratigraphy of Cretaceous and Cenozoic deposits. Ibadan University Press, Ibadan

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2002) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 23(2):357–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Salcedo D, Almeida OP, Morales B, Toulkeridis T (2018) Landslide susceptibility mapping using fuzzy logic and multi-criteria evaluation techniques in the city of Quito, Ecuador. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2018-86

  • Shano L, Raghuvanshi T, Meten M (2020) Landslide susceptibility evaluation and hazard zonation techniques—a review. Geoenviron Dis 7:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Shit PK, Bhunia GS, Maiti R (2016) Potential landslide susceptibility mapping using weighted overlay model (WOM). Model Earth Syst Environ 2:21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0078-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R, Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslide: investigations and mitigation. Special report, vol 247. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 129–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Tešić D, Đorđević J, Hölbling D, Đorđević T, Blagojević D, Tomić N, Lukić A (2020) Landslide susceptibility mapping using AHP and GIS weighted overlay method: a case study from Ljig, Serbia. Serbian J Geosci 6:9–21. https://doi.org/10.18485/srbjgeosci.2020.6.1.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiery Y, Malet J, Maquaire O (2006) Test of fuzzy logic rules for landslide susceptibility assessment. SAGEO: Information Géographique: observation et localisation, structuration et analyse, représentation, Sep 2006, Strasbourg, France

  • Tsangaratos P, Ilia I (2016) Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: the influence of models’ complexity and training dataset size. CATENA 145:164–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K, Benjamin GJ, Ghazanfar KA, Lewis OA (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology 101:631–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakhshoori V, Zare M (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping by comparing weight of evidence, fuzzy logic, and frequency ratio methods. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 7(5):1731–1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1144655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30:399–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ, IAEG (1984) Commission on landslide and other mass movement on slopes, 1984. Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. The UNESCO Press, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L-J, Sawada K, Shuji M (2013) Landslide susceptibility analysis with logistic regression model based on FCM sampling strategy. Comput Geosci 57:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Li W, Chen W, Bai H (2015) GIS-based assessment of landslide susceptibility using certainty factor and index of entropy models for the Qianyang County of Baoji city, China. J Earth Syst Sci 124(7):1399–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi C, Han M, Hu X, Liu B, He K, Luo G, Xichao C (2022) Effectiveness of Newmark based sampling strategy for coseismic landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning, support vector machine, and logistic regression. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81:208

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. CATENA 72:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics, and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. CATENA 85:274–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Song Y, Xu S, He Y, Li Z, Yu X, Liang Y, Wu W, Wang Y (2022) Combining a class-weighted algorithm and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Wanzhou section of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Comput Geosci 158:104966

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present work did not receive any external financial assistance from any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johnbosco C. Egbueri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no competing interests regarding this work.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nwazelibe, V.E., Unigwe, C.O. & Egbueri, J.C. Integration and comparison of algorithmic weight of evidence and logistic regression in landslide susceptibility mapping of the Orumba North erosion-prone region, Nigeria. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 9, 967–986 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01549-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01549-6

Keywords

Navigation