Skip to main content
Log in

Dad and Mom Bods? Inferences of Parenting Ability from Bodily Cues

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Psychological Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Author Correction to this article was published on 01 February 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Though much research has explored how facial and bodily features connote heritable fitness, particularly in the context of short-term mating, such cues similarly may influence perceptions of potential parenting ability. The current study explored how body fat variation and breast size in female targets and body fat and muscularity variation in male targets influence men’s and women’s perceptions of targets’ positive (e.g., nurturance) and negative (e.g., hostility) parenting capacities. Participants viewed 4 female targets orthogonally manipulated along dimensions of adiposity (high vs. low) and breast size (small vs. large), and 4 male targets orthogonally manipulated along similar adiposity dimensions and muscularity (small vs. large) before indicating targets’ inferred parenting ability. High-fat female targets were perceived to have more positive and less negative parenting abilities relative to low-fat female targets, an effect that was most pronounced among women; breast size did not influence perceptions of female parenting ability. For male targets, high fat and small muscles were perceived as more indicative of positive parenting abilities and less indicative toward negative abilities; the low body fat/high muscle male target was perceived to have especially negative parenting abilities. These results suggest body cues often associated with good genes and short-term mating success also systematically influence perceptions of parenting ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 01 February 2020

    The original version of this article contained an error in how the results of a prior research study were reported.

References

  • Arnocky, S., Piché, T., Albert, G., Ouellette, D., & Barclay, P. (2017). Altruism predicts mating success in humans. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 416–435.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P. (2010). Altruism as a courtship display: some effects of third-party generosity on audience perceptions. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 123–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beall, A. T., & Schaller, M. (2019). Evolution, motivation, and the mating/parenting trade–off. Self and Identity, 18, 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, G., & Mace, R. (Eds.). (2012). Substitute parents: biological and social perspectives on all parenting in human societies (Vol. 3). Berghahn Books.

  • Brooks, R. C., Shelly, J. P., Jordan, L. A., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). The multivariate evolution of female body shape in an artificial digital ecosystem. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2019). Is pulling the lever sexy? Deontology as a downstream cue to long-term mate quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 957–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2018). Put a (limbal) ring on it: women perceive men’s limbal rings as a health cue in short-term mating domains. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 80–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2017). Unrestricted sociosexuality predicts preferences for extraverted male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Sacco, D. F., & Medlin, M. M. (2019). Sociosexual attitudes differentially predict men and women’s preferences for agreeable male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckels, E. E., Beall, A. T., Hofer, M. K., Lin, E. Y., Zhou, Z., & Schaller, M. (2015). Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: assessment, prediction, and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2013). The role of facial hair in women’s perceptions of men’s attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 236–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Duncan, M., & Dixson, A. F. (2015). The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1685–1695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Kennedy-Costantini, S., Lee, A. J., & Nelson, N. L. (2019). Mothers are sensitive to men’s beards as a potential cue of paternal investment. Hormones and Behavior, 113, 55–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gettler, L. T. (2010). Direct male care and hominin evolution: why male–child interaction is more than a nice social idea. American Anthropologist, 112, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012). Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: a cross-cultural comparison with US samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 631–655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly, D. (2013). Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: further investigations using the mate preferences towards altruistic traits scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 395–398.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., et al. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., et al. (2013a). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., DelPriore, D. J., & Butterfield, M. E. (2013b). Ecological contingencies in women’s calorie regulation psychology: a life history approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 888–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzleitner, I. J., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). Perception of strength from 3D faces is linked to facial cues of physique. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., et al. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29, 996–1005.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, K. A., Nilsson, I., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2010). Danish health care providers’ perception of breastfeeding difficulty experienced by women who are obese, have large breasts, or both. Journal of Human Lactation, 26, 138–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, N., & Murray, D. R. (2019). Politics and parental care: experimental and mediational tests of the causal link between parenting motivation and social conservatism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550619853598.

  • Kleiman, D. G., & Malcolm, J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In Parental care in mammals (pp. 347–387). Springer, Boston, MA.

  • Krems, J. A., Kenrick, D. T., & Neel, R. (2017). Individual perceptions of self-actualization: what functional motives are linked to fulfilling one’s full potential? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1337–1352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2019). Evidence supporting nubility and reproductive value as the key to human female physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior.

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 322–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Kelly, A. J., von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P. (2012). Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 779–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J., Valentine, K. A., et al. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Men’s strategic preferences for femininity in female faces. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 364–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, M. C., Weis, R., O’Hare, E., & Rubin, E. C. (1999). Development and initial validation of the Parent Behavior Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 11, 534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukaszewski, A. W., Larson, C. M., Gildersleeve, K. A., Roney, J. R., & Haselton, M. G. (2014). Condition-dependent calibration of men’s uncommitted mating orientation: evidence from multiple samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, E., Banchefsky, S., & Park, B. (2018). Psychological consequences of the dad bod: using biological and physical changes to increase essentialist perceptions of fathers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 330–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs, O., Crépin, C., Thiéry, C., Golay, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Obesity and the four facets of impulsivity. Patient Education and Counseling, 79, 372–377.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. D., & Morrison, E. L. (2005). The symptoms of resource scarcity: judgments of food and finances influence preferences for potential partners. Psychological Science, 16, 167–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pirlott, A. G., & Cook, C. L. (2018). Prejudices and discrimination as goal activated and threat driven: the affordance management approach applied to sexual prejudice. Psychological Review, 125, 1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, R. J., & Quinlan, M. B. (2007). Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds: cross-cultural tests of alternative hypotheses. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E. B., Lawyer, S. R., & Reilly, W. (2010b). Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behavioural Processes, 83, 23–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, K. M., Abrams, B., Bodnar, L. M., Butte, N. F., Catalano, P. M., & Siega-Riz, A. M. (2010a). Recommendations for weight gain during pregnancy in the context of the obesity epidemic. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116, 1191.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: from personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 147470490800600204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073–15078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. K., Fessler, D. M., Tiokhin, L., Frederick, D. A., Lee, S. W., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Trade-offs in a dangerous world: women’s fear of crime predicts preferences for aggressive and formidable mates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. L., Deady, D. K., Moore, F. R., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Stirrat, M., et al. (2012). Maternal tendencies in women are associated with estrogen levels and facial femininity. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013). Resource security impacts men’s female breast size preferences. PLoS One, 8, e57623.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tinlin, R. M., Watkins, C. D., Welling, L. L., DeBruine, L. M., Al-Dujaili, E. A., & Jones, B. C. (2013). Perceived facial adiposity conveys information about women’s health. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 235–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Aldinc: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Borell, C. J., Kordsmeyer, T. L., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2019). An integrative study of facultative personality calibration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald F. Sacco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sacco, D.F., Holifield, K., Drea, K. et al. Dad and Mom Bods? Inferences of Parenting Ability from Bodily Cues. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 207–214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00229-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00229-x

Keywords

Navigation