Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-Cultural Preferences for Women’s Waist to Hip Ratio and Men’s Shoulder to Hip Ratio: Data From Iran, Norway, Poland, and Russia

  • Research
  • Published:
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Body size and shape are sexually dimorphic in humans, with men being characterized with larger upper bodies, while women typically having broader pelvises. Such sexually dimorphic traits, quantified as shoulder to hip ratio (SHR) in men and waist to hip ratio (WHR) in women, serve as cues of an individual’s genetic fitness, reproductive potential, health, and resource holding power, and, thereby, functioning as attractiveness cues to the opposite sex.

Methods

In the current study, we investigated men’s and women’s preference for the opposite sex body shape (WHR in women and SHR in men) in samples from Iran, Norway, Poland, and Russia. Women rated their preference for men’s SHR (1.20 to 1.50) and men rated their preference for women’s WHR (0.55 − 0.85).

Results and Conclusion

Our results showed that Iranian and Norwegian men preferred less feminine WHRs in women compared to Polish and Russian men. Moreover, Iranian women preferred less masculine SHRs in men than women from other countries. Altogether, the current research showed that there are variations in men’s preferences for women’s WHR and women’s preferences for men’s SHR among these countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Authors will share upon request.

References

  • Apicella, C. L. (2014). Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter–gatherers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(6), 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botzet, L. J., Shea, A., Vitzthum, V. J., et al. (2023). The Link between Age and Partner preferences in a large, international sample of single women. Hum Nat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-023-09460-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovet, J. (2019). Evolutionary theories and men’s preferences for women’s Waist-to-hip ratio: Which hypotheses remain? A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01221. 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovet, J., Lao, J., Bartholomée, O., Caldara, R., & Raymond, M. (2016). Mapping female bodily features of attractiveness. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R., Scott, I. M., Maklakov, A. A., Kasumovic, M. M., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2011). National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 278(1707), 810–814. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butovskaya, M., Sorokowska, A., Karwowski, M., Sabiniewicz, A., Fedenok, J., Dronova, D., & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Waist-to-hip ratio, body-mass index, age and number of children in seven traditional societies. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (2008). Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: Trade-offs between androgen-and estrogen-dependent traits. Current Anthropology, 49(6), 1099–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, J. M., Stone, A. M., & McCarthy, J. D. (2022). No time to waist: Low waist-to-hip ratios pop out in visual search. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.

  • Del Zotto, M., & Pegna, A. J. (2017). Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(3), 577–591.

  • Del Zotto, M., Framorando, D., & Pegna, A. J. (2020). Waist-to‐hip ratio affects female body attractiveness and modulates early brain responses. European Journal of Neuroscience, 52(11), 4490–4498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derenne, A., Breitstein, R. M., & Cicha, R. J. (2008). Shifts in postdiscrimination gradients within a stimulus dimension based on female waist-to-hip ratios. The Psychological Record, 58(1), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19(1), 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(3), 369–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010a). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–US comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 798–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010b). Watching the hourglass. Human Nature, 21(4), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(1), 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J. W., Grimshaw, G. M., Ormsby, D. K., & Dixson, A. F. (2014). Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, P. T. (1990). Human ovarian function and Reproductive Ecology: New hypotheses. American Anthropologist, 92(4), 933–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, V., Třebický, V., Pazhoohi, F., Leongómez, J. D., Tureček, P., Saribay, S. A., & Kleisner, K. (2021). Facial attractiveness and preference of sexual dimorphism: A comparison across five populations. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3.

  • Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2008). Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1640), 1279–1285.

  • Frisch, R. E., & Oxford (1987). England), 2(6), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Nordling, R. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in preferences for specific male and female body shapes. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 635–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G. Jr., & Frederick, D. A. (2010). The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza, R., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2020). Effects of women’s short-term mating orientation and self-perceived attractiveness in rating and viewing men’s waist to chest ratios. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1–9.

  • Garza, R., Heredia, R. R., & Cieslicka, A. B. (2016). Male and female perception of physical attractiveness: An eye movement study. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1), 1474704916631614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza, R., Heredia, R. R., & Cieslicka, A. B. (2017). An eye tracking examination of men’s attractiveness by conceptive risk women. Evolutionary Psychology, 1–11.

  • Garza, R., Pazhoohi, F., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2021). Women’s preferences for strong men under Perceived Harsh Versus Safe Ecological conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, 19(3), 14747049211032351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hönekopp, J., Rudolph, U., Beier, L., Liebert, A., & Müller, C. (2007). Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 106–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10(1), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasieńska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(1545), 1213–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karastergiou, K., Smith, S. R., Greenberg, A. S., & Fried, S. K. (2012). Sex differences in human adipose tissues–the biology of pear shape. Biology of sex Differences, 3(1), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The relative importance of intra-and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kościński, K. (2013). Attractiveness of women’s body: Body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance. Behavioral Ecology, 24(4), 914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurki, H. K. (2011). Pelvic dimorphism in relation to body size and body size dimorphism in humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 61(6), 631–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(5), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2018). Do the Low WHRs and BMIs Judged Most Attractive Indicate Better Health? Evolutionary Psychology, 16(4), 1474704918803998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918803998.

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2019). Evidence supporting nubility and reproductive value as the key to human female physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(5), 408–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. J., & Zietsch, B. P. (2011). Experimental evidence that women’s mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity. Biology Letters, 7(6), 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipowska, M., Truong Thi Khanh, H., Lipowski, M., Różycka-Tran, J., Bidzan, M., & Ha, T. T. (2019). The body as an object of stigmatization in cultures of guilt and shame: A Polish–Vietnamese comparison. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16), 2814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Saxton, T. K., Roberts, S. C., Jones, B. C., Debruine, L. M., Vukovic, J., Perrett, D. I., Feinberg, D. R., & Chenore, T. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(6), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowska, U. M., Kozlov, M. V., Cai, H., Contreras-Garduño, J., Dixson, B. J., Oana, G. A., & Rantala, M. J. (2014). Cross-cultural variation in men’s preference for sexual dimorphism in women’s faces. Biology Letters, 10(4), 20130850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., & Dixson, B. J. (2019). Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F., & Wetsman, A. (2001). Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(3), 481–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F., Apicella, C., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(6), 458–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirfazeli, F. S., Lai, M. C., Memari, A., Rajab, A., Shafizadeh, M., Zarei, S., & Vahabie, A. H. (2021). Short-term and long-term mate preference in men and women in an Iranian population. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2002). Women’s height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1503), 1919–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. (2005). Waist-to-hip ratio versus body mass index as predictors of fitness in women. Human Nature, 16(2), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2017). The effect of religious clothing on gaze behavior: An eye-tracking experiment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(3), 176–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., Doyle, J. F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2019). Sex differences for preferences of shoulder to hip ratio in men and women: An eye tracking study. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(4), 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2020a). Waist to hip ratio and breast size modulate the processing of female body silhouettes: An EEG study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(2), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., Macedo, A. F., Doyle, J. F., & Arantes, J. (2020b). Waist-to-hip ratio as supernormal stimuli: Effect of contrapposto pose and viewing angle. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(3), 837–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2023a). Neural correlates and perceived attractiveness of male and female shoulder-to-hip ratio in men and women: An EEG study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02610-w

  • Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., & Kingstone, K. (2023b). The interacting effects of height and shoulder-to-hip ratio on perceptions of attractiveness masculinity and fighting ability: Experimental design and ecological validity considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(1), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02416-2

  • Platek, S. M., & Singh, D. (2010). Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. PLoS One, 5(2), e9042.

  • Pokrywka, L., Čabrić, M., & Krakowiak, H. (2006). Body mass index and waist: Hip ratio are not enough to characterise female attractiveness. Perception, 35(12), 1693–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provost, M. P., Komos, C., Kosakoski, G., & Quinsey, V. L. (2006). Sociosexuality in women and preference for facial masculinization and somatotype in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provost, M. P., Troje, N. F., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Short- term mating strategies and attraction to masculinity in point-light walkers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, C. (2002). Variation in human body size and shape. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men’s bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171819.

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T. S., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svare, A., Nilsen, T. I., Bjøro, T., Åsvold, B. O., & Langhammer, A. (2011). Serum TSH related to measures of body mass: Longitudinal data from the HUNT study, Norway. Clinical Endocrinology, 74(6), 769–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. The Lancet, 353(9163), 1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. C. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 21(3), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(4), 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396(6709), 321–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

D.D. and D.G. were supported by the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University). Marta Kowal was supported by the National Science Center, Poland (2019/33/N/HS6/00054).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

    Farid Pazhoohi

  2. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Reza Afhami

  3. PROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Razieh Chegeni

  4. HSE University, Moscow, Russia

    Dmitrii Dubrov & Dmitry Grigoryev

  5. SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland

    Katarzyna Gałasińska

  6. Texas A&M International University, Laredo, USA

    Ray Garza

  7. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Nasim Ghahraman Moharrampour

  8. IDN Being Human Lab, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland

    Marta Kowal

  9. Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Ståle Pallesen

  10. Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Gerit Pfuhl

Authors
  1. Farid Pazhoohi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reza Afhami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Razieh Chegeni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dmitrii Dubrov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Katarzyna Gałasińska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ray Garza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nasim Ghahraman Moharrampour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dmitry Grigoryev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marta Kowal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ståle Pallesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gerit Pfuhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.P., conceptualization, data collection, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation; R.A., R.C., D.D., K.G., N.G.M., D.G., M.K., S.P., G.P., data collection, writing—review and editing; R.A., Stimuli preparation; R.G., writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farid Pazhoohi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Each member of the team involved in data collection adhered to the ethical principles of their respective Institutional Review Boards and received approval. Data collection was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki as it pertains to research with human participants.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pazhoohi, F., Afhami, R., Chegeni, R. et al. Cross-Cultural Preferences for Women’s Waist to Hip Ratio and Men’s Shoulder to Hip Ratio: Data From Iran, Norway, Poland, and Russia. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 10, 1–17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-024-00232-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-024-00232-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation