Skip to main content
Log in

Gluttons for Punishment? Experimentally Induced Hunger Unexpectedly Reduces Harshness of Suggested Punishments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Although many societies endorse objectivity in moral judgment and punishment, humans are frequently influenced by deep-rooted biases, such that superficially irrelevant factors can influence moral judgment and decision making. Hunger is a fundamental source of motivation and is known to redirect behavior in other domains. The present research aims to test whether hunger influences moral judgments and punishments.

Method

We first report results from four pilot studies (n = 1354) which, taken together, imply a positive relationship between self-reported hunger and harsher moral judgment. The main preregistered study then examined the effect of experimentally induced hunger on judicial sentencing and moral judgments. Hunger was manipulated by asking 246 undergraduates to not eat for at least four hours before the study. Participants in the Satiated condition received a snack before taking questionnaires, while those in the Hungry condition were given the same snack after responding to the questionnaires.

Results

Contrary to our pre-registered predictions, participants in the Hungry condition recommended significantly more lenient punishments, while the manipulation had no effect on moral judgment.

Conclusions

Overall, the results suggest caution regarding previous findings indicating that hungry people punish more, and offer tentative evidence of the opposite effect under some conditions. We discuss possible reasons for the apparent inconsistencies between studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data and syntax for these pilot studies are available at: https://osf.io/xjnu2/?view_only=afeee80cd62448f88229abb21a5a0ed4

  2. Data, materials, and syntax, as well as predictions and analysis plans for the study are publicly accessible at: https://osf.io/xjnu2/?view_only=afeee80cd62448f88229abb21a5a0ed4.

  3. Given that the two DVs may be more appropriately represented as their weighted composites, we re-ran these analyses using the main factor extracted from a principal components analysis for each DV. This did not meaningfully impact the results of the analyses. In two ANOVAs, controlling for SES, there still emerged a main effect of condition on Punishment, F(1,220) = 5.18, p = .02, partial η2 = .02, and no effect of condition on Moral Vigilance, F(1,210) = 0.26, p = .61, partial η2 = .00. Using these composites in place of the averaged item scores reported in the main text also made no meaningful difference to the bivariate associations between these measures and self-reported hunger.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was not directly supported by any funding organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Kerry.

Ethics declarations

All research described in the article complies with US national law, and all studies were approved by the appropriate institutional review boards.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kerry, N., Loria, R.N. & Murray, D.R. Gluttons for Punishment? Experimentally Induced Hunger Unexpectedly Reduces Harshness of Suggested Punishments. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 5, 352–370 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-019-00121-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-019-00121-4

Keywords

Navigation