Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion: does it really make a difference?

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Permanent peritoneal dialysis (PD) access was first described and introduced in clinical practice more than 40 years ago. It is still undergoing modification and adaptation to various insertion techniques. PD Catheter insertion is commonly performed via one of the three techniques: (a) open surgical, (b) fluoroscopic-guided placement or blind percutaneous placements using a modified Seldinger technique and (c) minimally invasive. Catheter placement is thought to be the key to a successful PD programme and the economic advantages are lost if a patient switches to HD during the 1st year due to failure of PD. The objective of this document was to conduct an evidence-based assessment of a minimally invasive approach to PD catheter insertion, with particular regard to failure rates secondary to catheter dysfunction. Case series and randomised controlled trials suggest that laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters is safe, and useful for insertion of PD catheters in patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgery. An overall success rate of 90% with a less than 5% associated leak rate has been quoted, although a cost benefit analysis has not been performed. However, good grade I evidence is lacking and open surgery may be quicker, though results from on-going trial are awaited with interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asif A (2005) Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Minerva Chir 60:417–428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ (2009) Effective use of laparoscopy for long-term peritoneal dialysis access. Am J Surg 198:135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M et al (1997) Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 30:334–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu CT, Watson DI, Elias TJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: 7 years experience. ANZ J Surg 73(3):109–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shih YC, Guo A, Just PM et al (2005) Impact of initial dialysis modality and modality switches on Medicare expenditures of end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney Int 68:319–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkie M, Jenking S, Shrestha B. The Renal Association clinical guideline UK peritoneal access guidelines (PD access). 5th ed; 2009 (http://www.renal.org/clinical/guidelinesection/peritonealaccess)

  7. Danielsson A (2007) The controversy of placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Int 27:153–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blake PG (2008) The critical importance of good peritoneal catheter placement. Perit Dial Int 28(2):111–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flanigan M, Gokal R (2005) Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices toward optimum peritoneal access: a review of current developments. Perit Dial Int 25:132–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ash SR (2002) Chronic peritoneal dialysis catheters: procedures for placement, maintenance and removal. Semin Nephrol 22:221–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gadallah MF, Pervez A, El-Shahawy MA et al (1999) Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomised study on outcome. Am J Kidney Dis 33:118–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scalamogna A, De Vecchi A, Castelnovo C et al (1994) Peritoneal catheter outcome effects of mode of placement. Perit Dial Int 14:s81

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rugiu C, Lupo A, Bernich P et al (1997) 14 year experience with the double-cuff straight Tenckhoff catheters. Perit Dial Int 17:301–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Swartz DA, Sandroni SE, Moles KA (1993) Laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheter placement: a single centre experience. Perit Dial Int 13:s31

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ozener C, Bihorac A, Okoglu E (2001) Technical survival of PD catheters: comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1893–1899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jwo SC, Chen KS, Lee CC et al (2010) Prospective randomized study for comparison of open surgery with laparoscopic-assisted placement of tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter—a single center experience and Literature review. J Surg Res 159(1):489–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moon JY, Song S, Jung KH et al (2008) Fluoroscopically guided peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: long-term results from a single center. Perit Dial Int 28:163–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soontrapornchai P, Simapatanapong T (2005) Comparison of open and laparoscopic secure placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surg Endosc 19:137–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen SY, Chen TW, Lin SH et al (2007) Does previous abdominal surgery increase postoperative complication rates in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis? Perit Dial Int 27:557–559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maio R, Figueiredo N, Costa P (2008) Laparoscopic placement of Tenckhoff catheters for peritoneal dialysis: a safe, effective, and reproducible procedure. Perit Dial Int 28:170–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keshvari A, Najafi I, Jafari-Javid M et al (2009) Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation using a Tenckhoff trocar under local anesthesia with nitrous oxide gas insufflation. Am J Surg 197:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Crabtree JH (2009) The use of the laparoscope for dialysis catheter implantation; valuable carry-on or excess baggage? Perit Dial Int 29(4):394–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bannister KM, Watson DI, Pearce T et al (1997) Clinical and cost benefits of laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheters insertions for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 51:1328

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wilkie M, Wild J (2009) Peritoneal dialysis access-results from a UK survey. Perit Dial Int 29(3):355–357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bagul A, Firmin LC, Thiyagarajan UM et al (2011) Laparoscopic reinsertion/exchanges of peritoneal dialysis catheters using the modified Y-TEC(®) system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(4):322–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Crabtree JH, Fishman A (2005) A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access. Am J Surg 71:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haggerty SP, Zeni TM, Carder M et al (2007) Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using a Quinton percutaneous insertion kit. JSLS 11:208–214

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ogunc G (2005) Minilaparoscopic extraperitoneal tunneling with omentopexy: a new technique for CAPD catheter placement. Perit Dial Int 25:551–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang JY, Chen FM, Huang TJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters for selected patients with previous abdominal operations. J Invest Surg 18(2):59–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmidt SC, Pohle C, Langrehr JM et al (2007) Laparoscopic-assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: implantation technique and results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(5):596–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gajjar AH, Rhoden DH, Kathuria P et al (2005) Peritoneal dialysis catheters: laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes. Am J Surg 194(6):872–875 (discussion 875–876)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Crabtree JH, Fishman A (2003) Selective performance of prophylactic omentopexy during laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:180–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Crabtree JH (2006) Selected best demonstrated practices in peritoneal dialysis access. Kidney Int 70:S27–S37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Crabtree JH, Fishman A (1999) Laparoscopic omentectomy for peritoneal dialysis catheter flow obstruction: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:228–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. García-Ureña MA, Rodríguez CR, Vega Ruiz V et al (2006) Prevalence and management of hernias in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 26:198–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Crabtree JH (2006) Hernia repair without delay in initiating or continuing peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 26:178–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Oreopoulos DG, Baird-Helfrich G, Khanna R (1987) Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices: current recommendations. Perit Dial Bull 7:130–138

    Google Scholar 

  38. Watson DI, Paterson D, Bannister K (1996) Secure placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters using a laparoscopic technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:35–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wright MJ, Bel’eed K, Johnson BF et al (1999) Randomized prospective comparison of laparoscopic and open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Perit Dial Int 19:372–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsimoyiannis EC, Siakas P, Glantzounis G et al (2000) Laparoscopic placement of the Tenckhoff catheter for peritoneal dialysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10(4):218–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Frost JH, Bagul A (2012) A brief recap of tips and surgical manoeuvres to enhance optimal outcome of surgically placed peritoneal dialysis catheters. Int J Nephrol 2012:251584

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hagen SM, van Alphen AM, Ijzermans JN et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion, the LOCI-trial: a study protocol. BMC Surg 11:35

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Xie H, Zhang W, Cheng J et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol 27(13):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Daschner M, Gfrörer S, Zachariou Z et al (2002) Laparoscopic Tenckhoff catheter implantation in children. Perit Dial Int 22:22–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mattioli G, Castagnetti M, Verrina E et al (2007) Laparoscopic-assisted peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation in pediatric patients. Urology 69(6):1185–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M et al (2005) European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 3 Peritoneal access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20(9):ix8–ix12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ranganathan D, Baer R, Fassett RG et al (2010) Randomised Controlled Trial to determine the appropriate time to initiate peritoneal dialysis after insertion of catheter to minimise complications (Timely PD study). BMC Nephrol 11:11

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Crabtree JH (2010) Who should place peritoneal dialysis catheters? Perit Dial Int 30(2):142–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atul Bagul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagul, A., Thiyagarajan, U.M. & Mamode, N. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion: does it really make a difference?. J Nephrol 27, 127–134 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-013-0031-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-013-0031-2

Keywords

Navigation