Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Spoken Language Outcomes in Children with ASD: a Systematic Review

  • Autism Spectrum (A Richdale, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Developmental Disorders Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comprehensive early intervention programs based on the principles of applied behaviour analysis can promote social communication development in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, it is not clear to what extent these positive results represent progress towards helping children achieve the ultimate goal of spontaneous, flexible, directed and effective spoken language for a range of purposes across all life contexts. The aim of this systematic review was to document the intervention targets and assessment tools used to measure spoken language outcomes for children with ASD receiving comprehensive intervention programs. A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Although social communication functioning was the most frequently targeted aspect of development, assessment of these skills relied predominantly on the use of standardised assessments. No studies included sampling and analysis of the children’s spoken language in daily activities. The lack of comprehensive measures with high ecological validity limits our ability to draw conclusions regarding spoken language outcomes from the studies to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Paul R, Norbury CF. Language disorders from infancy through adolescence. Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating. 4th ed. Baltimore: Mosby Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howlin P et al. Adult outcome for children with autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45:212–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Autism Center. National Standards Report. Randolph, MA: National Autism Centre; 2015. This report presents a comprehensive review of the evidence-base for ASD interventions based on research conducted in the period 2007-2012.

  4. Odom SL et al. Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Prev Sch Fail: Altern Educ Child Youth. 2010;54(4):275–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson G et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics. 2010;125(1):e17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bondy A, Frost L. The picture exchange communication system. Behav Modif. 2001;25(5):725–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maglione MA et al. Nonmedical interventions for children with ASD: recommended guidelines and further research needs. Pediatrics. 2012;130 Suppl 2:S169–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reichow B et al. Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD009260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tonge BJ et al. A review of evidence-based early intervention for behavioural problems in children with autism spectrum disorder: the core components of effective programs, child-focused interventions and comprehensive treatment models. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(2):158–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trembath D, Vivanti G. Problematic but predictive: individual differences in children with autism spectrum disorders. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(1):57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McConachie H et al. Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(41):1–506. The most comprehensive review of assessment tools for individuals with ASD currently available.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Matson JL, Rieske RD. Are outcome measures for early intensive treatment of autism improving? Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2014;8(3):178–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Condouris K, Meyer E, Tager-Flusberg H. The relationship between standardized measures of language and measures of spontaneous speech in children with autism. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2003;12(3):349–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matson JL. Determining treatment outcome in early intervention programs for autism spectrum disorders: a critical analysis of measurement issues in learning based interventions. Res Dev Disabil. 2007;28(2):207–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales—2nd edition (Vineland—II). Livonia: Pearson Assessments; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neisworth JT, Bagnato SJ. The mismeasure of young children—the authentic assessment alternative. Infants Young Child. 2004;17(3):198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fenson L, Dale PS, Reznick JS et al. Technical manual for the MacArthur communicative development inventories. San Diego: San Diego State University; 1991.

  18. Green J et al. Parent-mediated communication-focused treatment in children with autism (PACT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9732):2152–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. McConachie H et al. A controlled trial of a training course for parents of children with suspected autism spectrum disorder. J Pediatr. 2005;147(3):335–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Filipek PA et al. The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999;29(6):439–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Raising Children Network. Parent guide to therapies. 25/05/15]; Available from: http://raisingchildren.net.au/parents_guide_to_therapies/parents_guide_to_therapies.html

  22. NIASA, N.I.f.A.S.a.A. National Autism Plan for Children (NAPC): plan for the identification, assessment, diagnosis and access to early interventions for pre-school and primary school aged children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). London: The National Autistic Society; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kasari C et al. Assessing the minimally verbal school-aged child with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 2013;6(6):479–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Heilmann JJ, Miller JF, Nockerts A. Using language sample databases. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010;41(1):84–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tager-Flusberg H, Cooper J. Present and future possibilities for defining a phenotype for specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;42(5):1275–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunn M et al. The use of spontaneous language measures as criteria for identifying children with specific language impairment: an attempt to reconcile clinical and research incongruence. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39(3):643–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller JF. Progress in assessing, describing, and defining child language disorder. In: Cole CN, Dale PS, Thal DJ, editors. Assessment of communication and language. Baltimore: Paul Brookers Publishing Co.; 1996. p. 309–324.

  28. Pickering CM, Byrne J. The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early career researchers. High Educ Res Dev. 2014;33:534–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lovaas OI. Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rogers SJ, Vismara LA. Evidence-based comprehensive treatments for early autism. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008;37(1):8–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Birnbrauer JS, Leach DJ. The Murdoch early intervention project after 2 years. Behav Chang. 1993;10(2):63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith T, Groen AD, Wynn JW. Randomized trial of intensive early intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. Am J Ment Retard. 2000;105(4):269–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Eikeseth S et al. Intensive behavioral treatment at school for 4- to 7-year-old children with autism. A 1-year comparison controlled study. Behav Modif. 2002;26(1):49–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sallows GO, Graupner TD. Intensive behavioral treatment for children with autism: four-year outcome and predictors. Am J Ment Retard. 2005;110(6):417–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Howard JS et al. A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism. Res Dev Disabil. 2005;26:359–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen H, Amerine-Dickens M, Smith T. Early intensive behavioral treatment: replication of the UCLA model in a community setting. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006;27(2):S145–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eldevik S et al. Effects of low-intensity behavioral treatment for children with autism and mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36(2):211–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eikeseth S et al. Outcome for children with autism who began intensive behavioral treatment between ages 4 and 7: a comparison controlled study. Behav Modif. 2007;31(3):264–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zachor DA et al. Change in autism core symptoms with intervention. Res Autism Spectrum Disord. 2007;1(4):304–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reed P, Osborne LA, Corness M. Brief report: Relative effectiveness of different home-based behavioral approaches to early teaching intervention. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(9):1815–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Reed P, Osborne LA, Corness M. The real-world effectiveness of early teaching interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Except Child. 2007;73(4):417–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Magiati I, Charman T, Howlin P. A two-year prospective follow-up study of community-based early intensive behavioural intervention and specialist nursery provision for children with autism spectrum disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(8):803–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Remington B et al. Early intensive behavioral intervention: outcomes for children with autism and their parents after two years. Am J Ment Retard. 2007;112(6):418–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fava L et al. The effectiveness of a cross-setting complementary staff- and parent-mediated early intensive behavioral intervention for young children with ASD. Res Autism Spectrum Disord. 2011;5(4):1479–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hayward D et al. Assessing progress during treatment for young children with autism receiving intensive behavioural interventions. Autism. 2009;13(6):613–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Peters-Scheffer N et al. Low intensity behavioral treatment supplementing preschool services for young children with autism spectrum disorders and severe to mild intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(6):1678–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zachor DA, Itzchak EB. Treatment approach, autism severity and intervention outcomes in young children. Res Autism Spectrum Disord. 2010;4(3):425–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Eldevik S et al. Outcomes of behavioral intervention for children with autism in mainstream pre-school settings. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42(2):210–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Reed P, Osborne L. Impact of severity of autism and intervention time-input on child outcomes: comparison across several early interventions. Br J Spec Educ. 2012;39(3):130–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rogers SJ et al. Effects of a Brief Early Start Denver Model (ESDM)-based parent intervention on toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(10):1052–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Reitzel J et al. Pilot randomized controlled trial of a functional behavior skills training program for young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder who have significant early learning skill impairments and their families. Res Autism Spectrum Disord. 2013;7(11):1418–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mullen E. Mullen scales of early learning. Cicle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1985.

  54. Reynell J, Huntley M. Reynell developmental language scales—revised. 3rd ed. Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research Nelson; 1987.

  55. Kjellmer L et al. Language comprehension in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders without intellectual disability: use of the Reynell Developmental Language Scales. Res Autism Spectrum Disord. 2012;6(3):1119–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim SH, Junker D, Lord C. Observation of Spontaneous Expressive Language (OSEL): a new measure for spontaneous and expressive language of children with autism spectrum disorders and other communication disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(12):3230–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Chiang HM. Naturalistic observations of elicited expressive communication of children with autism: an analysis of teacher instructions. Autism. 2009;13(2):65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Westerveld M. Spontaneous language sampling and analysis in children: from research to practice. ACQuiring Knowledge Speech Lang Hearing. 2011;13(2):63–7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Miller JF, Andriacchi K, Nockerts A et al. Assessing language production using SALT software. A clinician’s guide to language sample analysis. New Zealand version. Middleton: SALT Software; 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Trembath.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

David Trembath reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1071881), during the conduct of the study.

Marleen Westerveld and Leanne Shellshear declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Autism Spectrum

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trembath, D., Westerveld, M. & Shellshear, L. Assessing Spoken Language Outcomes in Children with ASD: a Systematic Review. Curr Dev Disord Rep 3, 33–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0068-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0068-8

Keywords

Navigation