Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A historical review of the theory of gravity-assists in the pre-spaceflight era

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gravity-assist manoeuvre is a technique in which a spacecraft changes its orbital energy and angular momentum by a close-approach with a celestial body. The result is a great reduction in the use of fuel and flight time. Several interplanetary missions have applied it for this reason, like the famous Voyagers, Mariner, or Galileo. The astronomers knew the mechanics behind such concept for at least two centuries by noting the change in the orbits of the comets after passing close to Jupiter. The introduction of this phenomenon to spaceflight was a very successful story and motivated many claims that the proposal of the gravity-assist manoeuvres occurred in the early 60s. However, the idea of using such mechanism for interplanetary spaceflight can be traced back to the 20s. The dispute of being the first to have this idea contributed to throw shadow on these early pioneers. In that sense, the present paper has the goal of discussing some aspects related to the history of this manoeuvre in the pre-spaceflight era, trying to show some of the major steps made in its early history. It covers from the first studies found on this topic and goes up to the beginning of the space age, with the launching of the Sputnik satellite. This time period is chosen to bring light to these early works in which the astronomical phenomenon is introduced in the astronautics. Their importance is highlighted by putting these works under their historical context, as it shows how some of them were far ahead of their time. Among these, the work of Tsander, made in mid-20s, is outstanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is worth to mention that such study would surely benefit from the work of Merton [62].

References

  1. Anselmi A, Scoon GE (2001) Bepicolombo, ESA’s mercury cornerstone mission. Planet Space Sci 49(14–15):1409–1420

    Google Scholar 

  2. Battin RH (1959) The determination of round-trip planetary reconnaissance trajectories. J Aerosp Sci 26(9):545–567

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Battin RH (1996) On algebraic compilers and planetary fly-by orbits. Acta Astronaut 38(12):895–902

    Google Scholar 

  4. Battin RH, Laning JH Jr (1961) A navigation theory for round-trip reconnaissance missions to venus and mars. Planet Space Sci 7:40–56

    Google Scholar 

  5. Besser B (2001) Contributions of Austrian pioneers to early European rocketry. In: 39th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, p 174

  6. Breakwell JV (1961) Researches in interplanetary transfer. ARS J 31(2):201–208

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broucke RA (2002) On the history of the slingshot effect and cometary orbits. Adv Astronaut Sci 109:1927–1939

  8. Broucke RA, Prado A (1993) Jupiter swing-by trajectories passing near the earth. Adv Astronaut Sci 82(2):1159–1176

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campagnola S, Jehn R, Corral C (2004) Design of lunar gravity assist for the BepiColombo mission to mercury. In: Paper AAS, pp 4–130

  10. Campagnola S, Russell RP (2010) Endgame problem part 2: multibody technique and the tisserand–poincare graph. J Guid Control Dyn 33(2):476–486

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carlson R, Judge D (1974) Pioneer 10 ultraviolet photometer observations at jupiter encounter. J Geophys Res 79(25):3623–3633

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crocco GA (1956) One-year exploration-trip earth–mars–venus–earth. In: Proceedings of the VIIth international astronautical Congress, Rome, pp 227–252

  13. Cutting E (1965) Trajectory analysis of a 1970 mission to mercury via a close encounter with venus. In: 2nd Aerospace sciences meeting, p 90

  14. DeVorkin D (1987) Organizing for space research: the V-2 rocket panel. Hist Stud Phys Biol Sci 18(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diehl R, Nock K (1979) Galileo jupiter encounter and satellite tour trajectory design. In: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics conference

  16. Dowling RL, Kosmann WJ, Minovitch MA, Ridenoure RW (1990) The origin of gravity-propelled interplanetary space travel. In: Proceedings of the 41st international astronautical federation

  17. Dowling RL, Kosmann WJ, Minovitch MA, Ridenoure RW (1999) The effect of gravity-propelled interplanetary space travel on the exploration of the solar system—historical survey, 1961–2000. In: IAF, International Astronautical Congress, 50th, Amsterdam

  18. Dunne JA, Burgess E (1978) The voyage of Mariner 10. National Aeronautics and Space Administration SP 424

  19. Egorov VA (1958) Certain problems of moon flight dynamics. The Russian Literature of Satellites 107–174 (English translation of O nekotorykh zadachakh dinamiki poleta k Lune)

  20. Ehricke KA (1954) A new supply system for satellite orbits—part 1. J Jet Propuls 24(5):302–309

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ehricke KA (1957) Instrumented comets—astronautics of solar and planetary probes. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Astronautical Congress, Barcelona, vol 493-57. American Rocket Society, pp 74–126

  22. Ehricke KA (1963) Orbital operations. In: Advances in space science and technology, vol 5. Academic Press Inc, Cambridge, pp 231–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4831-9963-4.50012-9

  23. Ehricke KA, Merrill G, Street R (1960) Space flight. Phys Today 13:62

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fimmel RO (1977) Pioneer odyssey. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N 77

  25. Fimmel RO, Van Allen J, Burgess E (1980) Pioneer: first to jupiter, saturn, and beyond. NASA Special Publication 446

  26. Flandro G (1966) Fast reconnaissance missions to the outer solar system utilizing energy derived from the gravitational field of jupiter. Earth 108:6-1

    Google Scholar 

  27. Flandro G (2001) From instrumented comets to grand tours—on the history of gravity assist. In: 39th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, p 176

  28. Fox N, Velli M, Bale S, Decker R, Driesman A, Howard R, Kasper JC, Kinnison J, Kusterer M, Lario D et al (2016) The solar probe plus mission: humanity’s first visit to our star. Space Sci Rev 204(1–4):7–48

    Google Scholar 

  29. Freeman M (2003) The contributions of Fridrikh Tsander: a memoir. Acta Astronaut 52(8):591–599

    Google Scholar 

  30. Freeman M, Ehricke K, Schmitt H (2009) Krafft Ehricke’s Extraterrestrial imperative. Apogee Books, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gallentine J (2009) Ambassadors from earth: pioneering explorations with unmanned spacecraft. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gedeon G (1962) Round-trip trajectories to mars and venus. AAS Prepresent 62:30

    Google Scholar 

  33. Geppert AC (2008) Space personae: cosmopolitan networks of peripheral knowledge, 1927–1957. J Mod Eur Hist 6(2):262–286

    Google Scholar 

  34. Glassmeier KH, Boehnhardt H, Koschny D, Kührt E, Richter I (2007) The Rosetta mission: flying towards the origin of the solar system. Space Sci Rev 128(1–4):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gobetz FW (1963) Optimum transfers between hyperbolic asymptotes. AIAA J 1(9):2034–2041

    Google Scholar 

  36. Greenberg R, Carusi A, Valsecchi G (1988) Outcomes of planetary close encounters: a systematic comparison of methodologies. Icarus 75(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  37. Guardabassi GO (2007) The dawn of control science in italy from intuitive engineering to modern control theory and automation technology. Eur J Control 13(1):36–48

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Guo Y, Farquhar RW (2008) New horizons mission design. Space Sci Rev 140(1–4):49–74

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hacker BC (1974) The idea of rendezvous: from space station to orbital operations in space-travel thought, 1895–1951. Technol Cult 15(3):373–388

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hansen CJ, Bolton SJ, Matson DL, Spilker LJ, Lebreton JP (2004) The Cassini–Huygens flyby of jupiter. Icarus 172(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hechler M (1997) Rosetta mission design. Adv Space Res 19(1):127–136

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hollister W, Prussing J (1965) Optimum transfer to mars via venus. In: Thermophysics specialist conference, p 700

  43. Hunter M II, London H (1965) Propulsion for unmanned exploration of the solar system. Unmanned Spacecr Meet 1965:1408

    Google Scholar 

  44. James GS (2015) A background of memories of working with Dr. Wernher von Braun, Krafft Ehricke and members of the Peenemunde Group. Acta Astronaut 113:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kohlhase C, Penzo P (1977) Voyager mission description. Space Sci Rev 21(2):77–101

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kondratyuk YV (1965) Pioneers of rocket technology. In: Conquest of interplanetary space. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. English translation of Pionery raketnoy tekhniki—Kibal’chich, Tsiolkovskiy, Tsander, Kondratyuk—Izbrannyye trudy

  47. Kondratyuk YV (1965) Pioneers of rocket technology. In: To whomsoever will read in order to build. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. English translation of Pionery raketnoy tekhniki—Kibal’chich, Tsiolkovskiy, Tsander, Kondratyuk—Izbrannyye trudy

  48. Korsmo FL (2004) Shaping up planet earth: the international geophysical year (1957–1958) and communicating science through print and film media. Sci Commun 26(2):162–187

    Google Scholar 

  49. Krull AR (1956) A history of the artificial satellite. J Jet Propuls 26(5):369–383

    Google Scholar 

  50. Launius RD (2010) An unintended consequence of the IGY: Eisenhower, Sputnik, the founding of NASA. Acta Astronaut 67(1–2):254–263

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lawden D (1954) Perturbation maneuvers. J Br Interplanet Soc 13(5):329–334

  52. Lawden DF (1955) Dynamic problems of interplanetary flight. Aeronaut Q 6(3):165–180

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lawden DF (1963) Optimal trajectories for space navigation, vol 3. Butterworths, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Ley W (1935) Rocket propulsion: a résumé of theory with an account of the practical experiments made to date. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 7(9):227–231

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ley W (1944) Rockets: the future of travel beyond the stratosphere. Viking Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  56. Maksimov A (2007) FA Zander and Yu. V. Kondratyuk, pioneers of rocket engineering. Thermophys Aeromech 14(4):469–492

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mark H (1987) The space station: a personal journey. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  58. Matousek S (2007) The Juno new frontiers mission. Acta Astronaut 61(10):932–939

    Google Scholar 

  59. McNutt RL Jr, Solomon SC, Gold RE, Leary JC, Team M et al (2006) The messenger mission to mercury: development history and early mission status. Adv Space Res 38(4):564–571

    Google Scholar 

  60. McNutt RL Jr, Solomon SC, Grard R, Novara M, Mukai T (2004) An international program for mercury exploration: synergy of messenger and bepicolombo. Adv Space Res 33(12):2126–2132

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mel’kumov T (1965) Pioneers of rocket technology: selected works, vol 9285. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  62. Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. Am Sociol Rev 22(6):635–659

    Google Scholar 

  63. Minovitch M (1961) A method for determining interplanetary free-fall reconnaissance trajectories. JPL Tech Memo 312:130

    Google Scholar 

  64. Minovitch M (1965) Utilizing large planetary pertubations for the design of deep-space, solar-probe, and out-of-ecliptic trajectories. NASA technical report no 32-849

  65. Minovitch MA (1963) The determination and potentialities of advanced free-fall iinterplanetary trajectories. In: Proceedings of the first graduate academy of the University of California, Spring Recess

  66. Minovitch MA (2010) The invention that opened the solar system to exploration. Planet Space Sci 58(6):885–892

    Google Scholar 

  67. Negri RB, Prado AFBA, Sukhanov A (2017) Studying the errors in the estimation of the variation of energy by the “patched-conics” model in the three-dimensional swing-by. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 129(3):269–284

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  68. Negri RB, Sukhanov A, Prado AFBA (2019) Lunar gravity assists using patched-conics approximation, three and four body problems. Adv Space Res 64(1):42–63

    Google Scholar 

  69. Neufeld MJ (1990) Weimar culture and futuristic technology: the rocketry and spaceflight fad in Germany, 1923–1933. Technol Cult 31(4):725–752

    Google Scholar 

  70. Neufeld MJ (1995) The rocket and the Reich: Peenemünde and the coming of the ballistic missile era. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  71. Neufeld MJ (2012) The three heroes of spaceflight: The rise of the Tsiolkovsky–Goddard–Oberth interpretation and its current validity. Quest: The History of Spaceflight Quarterly

  72. Neufeld MJ (2018) Spaceflight: a concise history. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  73. Newton HA (1878) Art. xv.—on the origin of comets. Am J Sci Arts (1820–1879) 16(93):165

    Google Scholar 

  74. Niehoff J (1965) An analysis of gravity assisted trajectories in the ecliptic plane. IIT Research Institute. Report no T-12

  75. Perozzi E (1986) Cassini mission: dynamics of the titan close encounter. ESA Spec Publ 242:283

    Google Scholar 

  76. Prado AFBA (2007) A comparison of the “patched-conics approach” and the restricted problem for swing-bys. Adv Space Res 40(1):113–117

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rauschenbakh V, Ovchinnikov MY, McKenna-Lawlor SM (2006) Essential spaceflight dynamics and magnetospherics, vol 15. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  78. Reichhardt T (1994) Gravity’s overdrive. Air Space 8:72–78

    Google Scholar 

  79. Richmond Y (2010) Cultural exchange and the cold war: raising the iron curtain. Penn State Press, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ross S et al (1962) A study of interplanetary transportation systems. Final Rep 3:17–62

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ross SD, Scheeres DJ (2007) Multiple gravity assists, capture, and escape in the restricted three-body problem. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 6(3):576–596

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Ruppe HO (1961) Interplanetary flight. In: Koelle H-H (ed) Handbook of astronautical engineering. McGraw-Hill, pp 9–32

  83. Rynin NA (1970) Interplanetary flight and communication—rockets, vol 2. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  84. Rynin NA (1970) Interplanetary flight and communication—theory of space flight, vol 3. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  85. Schwehm G, Schulz R (1999) Rosetta goes to comet Wirtanen. In: Altwegg K, Ehrenfreund P, Geiss J, Huebner WF (eds) Composition and origin of cometary materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 313–319

  86. Shepherd L (1994) Prelude and first decade, 1951–1961. Acta Astronaut 32(7–8):475–499

    Google Scholar 

  87. Siddiqi AA (2000) Challenge to Apollo: the Soviet Union and the space race, 1945–1974. The NASA history series. NASA SP: 2000-4408

  88. Siddiqi AA (2010) The Red Rockets’ Glare: Spaceflight and the Russian Imagination, 1857–1957. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sohn RL (1964) Venus swingby mode for manned mars missions. J Spacecr Rockets 1(5):565–567

    Google Scholar 

  90. Strange NJ, Longuski JM (2002) Graphical method for gravity-assist trajectory design. J Spacecr Rockets 39(1):9–16

    Google Scholar 

  91. Sweetser TH (1993) Jacobi’s integral and deltaV-earth-gravity-assist trajectories. In: 1993 AAS/AIAA astrodynamics conference

  92. Sykora F (1977) Guido von Pirquet: Austrian pioneer of astronautics. NASA, Washington essays on the history of rocketry and astronautics, vol 1, pp 140–155

  93. Tsander FA (1964) Problems of flight by jet propulsion. In: Flights to other planets (The theory of interplanetary travel), 2nd edn. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem. English translation of Problema poleta pri pomoshehi reaktivnykh apparatov

  94. von Pirquet G (1928) Die Rakete. In: Die Jupiterreise, vol 2, pp 183–190

  95. von Pirquet G (1929) Die Rakete. In: Die Jupiterreise, vol 3, pp 9–13

  96. von Pirquet G (1950) Meteors and space-travel. J Br Interplanet Soc 9(4):153–154

    Google Scholar 

  97. Wenzel K, Marsden R, Page D, Smith E (1992) The ULYSSES mission. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 92:207

    Google Scholar 

  98. Winter FH (1983) Prelude to the space age: the rocket societies, 1924–1940. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  99. Yegorov VA (1957) Some problems relating to the dynamics of the flight to the moon. In: Proceedings of the 8th international astronautical Congress, Barcelona. Springer, Berlin, p 480

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their appreciation for the support provided by Grants \(\#\) 406841/2016-0 and 301338/2016-7 from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq); Grants \(\#\) 2017/20794-2, 2015/19880-6 and 2016/24561-0 from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) and the financial support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). The authors also wish to express the appreciation for the copies of Guidon von Pirquet works provided by Linda Hall Library through Dr. Benjamin Gross. The contact came to be after reading the article about von Pirquet by Dr. William B. Ashworth, Jr. in the library’s website. We also thank the personnel working at the INPE’s (National Institute for Space Research) library for finding several papers used in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Space Research, São José dos Campos, Brazil

    Rodolfo Batista Negri & Antônio Fernando Bertachini de Almeida Prado

Authors
  1. Rodolfo Batista Negri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antônio Fernando Bertachini de Almeida Prado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodolfo Batista Negri.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Jader Barbosa Jr., PhD.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negri, R.B., Prado, A.F.B.A. A historical review of the theory of gravity-assists in the pre-spaceflight era. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02489-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02489-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation