Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soil quality assessment for desertification based on multi-indicators with the best-worst method in a semi-arid ecosystem

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since there are some signs of land degradation and desertification showing how soil sustainability is threatened, it is crucial to create a soil quality index (SQI) model in the semi-arid Çorum Basin, situated between the Black Sea and Anatolia Region, Central Turkey. The primary aims of the study are: (1) to determine SQI values of the micro-basin in terms of land degradation and desertification. Moreover, the best-worst method (BWM) was used to determine the weighting score for each parameter; (2) to produce the soils’ spatial distribution by utilizing different geostatistical models and GIS (geographic information system) techniques; and (3) to validate the obtained SQI values with biomass reflectance values. Therefore, the relationship of RE-OSAVI (red-edge optimized soil-adjusted vegetation index) and NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) generated from Sentinel-2A satellite images at different time series with soil quality was examined. Results showed that SQI values were high in the areas that had almost a flat and slight slope. Moreover, the areas with high clay content and thick soil depth did not have salinity problems, and were generally distributed in the middle parts of the basin. However, the areas with a high slope, poor vegetation, high sand content, and low water holding capacity had low SQI values. Furthermore, a statistically high positive correlation of RE-OSAVI and NDVI indices with soil quality was found, and NDVI had the highest correlative value for June (R2=0.802) compared with RE-OSAVI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed G B, Shariff A R M, Balasundram S K, et al. 2016. Agriculture land suitability analysis evaluation based multi criteria and GIS approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 37: 012044, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/37/1/012044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbaş B, Akdeniz N, Aksay A, et al. 2011. 1:1250000 Scaled Geology Map of Turkey. Ankara: General Directorate of the Mineral Research and Exploration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Bakri J T, Suleiman A S. 2004. NDVI response to rainfall in different ecological zones in Jordan. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(19): 3897–3912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews S S, Karlen D L, Cambardella C A. 2004. The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Science Society of America, 68(6): 1945–1962.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri N, Ahmadi H, Alavipanah S, et al. 2012. Soil-line vegetation indices for corn nitrogen content prediction. International Agrophysics, 26(2): 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölük E. 2016. Climate of Turkey according to Erinç Climate Class. Ankara: Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, General Directorate of Meteorology, 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouyoucos G J. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal, 43(9): 434–438.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y D, Wang H Y, Zhou J M, et al. 2013. Minimum data set for assessing soil quality in farmland of Northeast China. Pedosphere, 23(5): 564–576.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corine. 2018. CORINE land use land cover map of Turkey. [2021-02-25]. https://corinecbs.tarimorman.gov.tr/.

  • Costantini E A C, Branquinho C, Nunes A, et al. 2016. Soil indicators to assess the effectiveness of restoration strategies in dryland ecosystems. Solid Earth, 7: 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Rocha Junior P P, Sturiao W P, Noueira O N, et al. 2020. Soil quality indicators to evaluate environmental services at different landscape positions and land uses in the Atlantic forest biome. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 7: 100047, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedeoğlu M, Dengiz O. 2019. Generating of land suitability index for wheat with hybrid system approach using AHP and GIS. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 167: 105062, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedeoğlu M, Başayiğit L, Yüksel M, et al. 2020. Assessment of the vegetation indices on Sentinel-2A images for predicting the soil productivity potential in Bursa, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192: 16, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7989-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirağ Turan İ, Dengiz O, Özkan B. 2019. Spatial assessment and mapping of soil quality index for desertification in the semi-arid terrestrial ecosystem using MCDM in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 164: 104933, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dengiz O, Özcan H, Erşahin S. 2017. Lixisols. In: Selim K, Erhan A, Hikmet G. The Soils of Turkey. Berlin: Springer, 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan-Babaei F, Nosrati K, Mirghaed F A, et al. 2021. The interrelation between landform, land-use, erosion and soil quality in the Kan catchment of the Tehran province, central Iran. CATENA, 204: 105412, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran J W, Coleman D C, Bezdicek D, et al. 1994. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran J W, Parkin T B. 1996. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: A minimum data set. In: Doran J W, Jones A J. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality, Special Publication No. 49. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elalfy Z, Elhadary R, Elashry A. 2010. Integrating GIS and MCDM to deal with landfill site selection. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 10(6): 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyüpoğlu F. 1999. The State of Productivity of the Territory of Turkey. Ankara: Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Publications, 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathizad H, Ardakani M A H, Heung B, et al. 2020. Spatio-temporal dynamic of soil quality in the central Iranian desert modeled with machine learning and digital soil assessment techniques. Ecological Indicators, 118: 106736, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106736.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald G, Rodriguez D, O’Leary G. 2010. Measuring and predicting canopy nitrogen nutrition in wheat using a spectral index–the canopy chlorophyll content index (CCCI). Field Crops Research, 116(3): 318–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganiyu S A. 2018. Evaluation of soil hydraulic properties under different non-agricultural land use patterns in a basement complex area using multivariate statistical analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(10): 595, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6959-x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gen S, Li W, Kang T, et al. 2021. An integrated index based on climatic constraints and soil quality to simulate vegetation productivity patterns. Ecological Indicators, 129: 108015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girmay G Singh B R, Mitiku H, et al. 2008. Carbon stocks in Ethiopian soils in relation to land use and soil management. Land Degradation & Development, 19(4): 351–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P. 1998. Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27: 315–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R K, Vijayan D, Prasad T S. 2003. Comparative analysis of red-edge hyperspectral indices. Advances in Space Research, 32(11): 2217–2222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield J L. 2014. Soil degradation, land use, and sustainability. In: David D S, Jerry L H, Dwight T T. Convergence of Food Security, Energy Security and Sustainable Agriculture. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M L. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Verlag: Prentice Hall Inc., 193–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Liu Y, Wu S, et al. 2021. Analyzing ecological environment change and associated driving factors in China based on NDVI time series data. Ecological Indicators, 129: 107933, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L L, Han G M, Lan Y, et al. 2017. Corn cob biochar increases soil culturable bacterial abundance without enhancing their capacities in utilizing carbon sources in biolog eco-plates. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(3): 713–724.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbasi R, Jahangiri M, Mosavi A, et al. 2021. Finding the best station in Belgium to use residential-scale solar heating, one-year dynamic simulation with considering all system losses: Economic analysis of using ETSW. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 45: 101097, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaca S, Dengiz O, Demirağ Turan İ, et al. 2021. An assessment of pasture soils quality based on multi-indicator weighting approaches in semiarid ecosystem. Ecological Indicators, 121: 107001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen D L, Mausbach M J, Doran J W, et al. 1997. Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1): 4–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya N S, Özkan B, Dengiz O, et al. 2022. Digital mapping and spatial variability of soil quality index for desertification in the Akarçay Basin under the semi-arid terrestrial ecosystem using neutrosophic fuzzy-AHP approach. Natural Hazards, 112(3): 2101–2132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Iivari T, Kimble J M. 2003. Soil Degradation in the United States: Extent, Severity, and Trends. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Liao X, Zhu H, et al. 2019. Soil physical and hydraulic properties under different land uses in the black soil region of Northeast China. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 99(4): 406–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig M A, Varvel G, Doran J. 2001. A simple performance-based index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Soil and Crop Management, 93(2): 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Miller J R, Haboudane D, et al. 2004. Exploring the relationship between red edge parameters and crop variables for precision agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Anchorage: IGARSS, 1276–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J, Rinner C. 2015. Multi-criteria decision analysis in geographic information science. In: Matthias E, José R F, Salvatore G. Trends in Multiple Criterial Decision Analysis. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamehpour N, Rezapour S, Ghaemian N. 2021. Quantitative assessment of soil quality indices for urban croplands in a calcareous. Geoderma, 382: 114781, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114781.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Sanz J P, de Santiago-Martín A, Valverde-Asenjo I, et al. 2022. Comparison of soil quality indexes calculated by network and principal component analysis for carbonated soils under different uses. Ecological Indicators, 143: 109374, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matton N, Canto G S, Waldner F, et al. 2015. An automated method for annual cropland mapping along the season for various globally-distributed agrosystems using high spatial and temporal resolution time series. Remote Sensing, 7(10): 13208–13232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mijangos I, Garbisu C. 2010. Consequences of soil sampling depth during the assessment of the effects of tillage and fertilization on soil quality: A common oversight. Soil & Tillage Research, 109(2): 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirghaed F A, Souri B. 2022. Spatial analysis of soil quality through landscape patterns in the Shoor River Basin, Southwestern Iran. CATENA, 211: 106028, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla D J, McBratney A B. 2000. Soil spatial variability. In: Sumner M R. Handbook of Soil Science. Boca Raton: CRS Press, 321–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabiollahi K, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R, Kerry R, et al. 2017. Assessment of soil quality indices for salt-affected agricultural land in Kurdistan Province, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 83: 482–494.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nosrati K, Collins A L. 2019. A soil quality index for evaluation of degradation under land use and soil erosion categories in a small mountainous catchment Iran. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(11): 2577–2590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin E, Eroglu I, Pektezel H. 2017. Soil Quality Index (SQI) analysis of Tekirdag Province using GIS (Thrace, Turkey). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(4): 3005–3014.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Vik J O, Mysterud A, et al. 2005. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9): 503–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qasim S, Gul S, Shah M H, et al. 2017. Influence of grazing exclosure on vegetation biomass and soil quality. International Soil and Water Conservation, 5(1): 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Darilek J L, Huang B, et al. 2009. Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma, 149(3–4): 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmanipour F, Marzaioli R, Bahrami H A, et al. 2014. Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 40: 19–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raiesi F. 2017. A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions. Ecological Indicators, 75: 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J. 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53: 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J. 2016. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64: 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondeaux G, Steven M, Baret F. 1996. Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 55(2): 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinas-Zavala C A, Douglas A V, Diaz H F. 2002. Interannual variability of NDVI in northwest Mexico. Associated climatic mechanisms and ecological implications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82(2–3): 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaei F, Emami H, Lakzian A. 2022. Assessing soil quality of pasture and agriculture land uses in Shandiz county, northwestern Iran. Ecological Indicators, 139: 108974, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Francés F, Martínez-Graña A, Ávila-Zarza C, et al. 2019. Comparison of methods for evaluating soil quality of semiarid ecosystem and evaluation of the effects of physico-chemical properties and factor soil erodibility (Northern Plateau, Spain). Geoderma, 354(6): 113872, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.07.030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper L A, Sparling G P. 2000. Performance of soil condition indicators across taxonomic groups and land uses. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(1): 300–311.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shulka M K, Lal R, Ebinger M. 2006. Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil & Tillage Research, 87(2): 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skakun S, Franch B, Vermote E, et al. 2018. Winter wheat yield assessment using Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Data. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Valencia: IGARSS, 5964–5967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1992. Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples and Methods of Analysis for Soil Survey. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook No: 18. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taghipour K, Heydari M, Kooch Y, et al. 2022. Assessing changes in soil quality between protected and degraded forests using digital soil mapping for semiarid oak forests, Iran. CATENA, 213: 106204, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauqeer H M, Turan V, Iqbal M. 2022a. Managing plant production under changing environment. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauqeer H M, Turan V, Iqbal M. 2022b. Production of Safer Vegetables from Heavy Metals Contaminated Soils: The Current Situation, Concerns Associated with Human Health and Novel Management Strategies. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian K, Zhang B, Zhang H, et al. 2020. Evaluation of soil quality in major grain-producing region of the North China Plain: Integrating minimum data set and established critical limits. Ecological Indicator, 117: 106613, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106613.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Türkeş M, Öztaş. T, Tercan E, et al. 2020. Desertification vulnerability and risk assessment for Turkey via an analytical hierarchy procesmodel. Land Degradation Development, 31: 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzuner Ç, Dengiz O. 2020. Desertification risk assessment in Turkey based on environmentally sensitive areas. Ecological Indicators, 114: 106295, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen H, Ni S, Wang J, et al. 2021. Changes of soil quality induced by different vegetation restoration in the collapsing gully erosion areas of southern China. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 9(2): 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wójtowicz M, Wójtowicz A, Piekarczyk J. 2016. Application of remote sensing methods in agriculture. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science, 11(1): 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Niu Z, Tang Q, et al. 2008. Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices: Modeling and validation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(8): 1230–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veum K S, Goyn K W, Kremer R J, et al. 2014. Biological indicators of soil quality and soil organic matter characteristics in an agricultural management continuum. Biogeochernistry, 117(1): 81–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Q, Dash J, Huang W, et al. 2018. Vegetation indices combining the red and red-edge spectral information for leaf area index retrieval. Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11(5): 1482–1493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yifru A, Taye B. 2011. Land use effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen in some soils of Bale, southeastern Ethiopia. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst, 14(1): 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zand F, Matinfar H R. 2012. Winter wheat yield estimation base upon spectral data and ground measurement. Annals of Biological Research, 3(11): 5169–5177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeraatpisheh M, Bakhshandeh E, Hosseini M, et al. 2020. Assessing the effects of deforestation and intensive agriculture on the soil quality through digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 363: 114139, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Xu X, Li Z, et al. 2021. Improvements in soil quality with vegetation succession in subtropical China Karst. Science of the Total Environment, 775: 145876, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145876.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang L, Jiang J, et al. 2022. Application of soil quality index to determine the effects of different vegetation types on soil quality in the Yellow River Delta wetland. Ecological Indicators, 141: 109116, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55139, Turkey

    Orhan Dengiz

  2. Department of Geography, Faculty of Economic, Administrative and Social Sciences, Samsun University, Samsun, 55030, Turkey

    İnci Demirağ Turan

Authors
  1. Orhan Dengiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. İnci Demirağ Turan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Orhan DENGİZ, İnci DEMİRAĞ TURAN; Methodology: Orhan DENGİZ, İnci DEMİRAĞ TURAN; Formal analysis: Orhan DENGİZ, İnci DEMİRAĞ TURAN; Writing - original draft preparation: Orhan DENGİZ, İnci DEMİRAĞ TURAN; Writing - review and editing: Orhan DENGİZ, İnci DEMİRAĞ TURAN.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orhan Dengiz.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dengiz, O., Demirağ Turan, İ. Soil quality assessment for desertification based on multi-indicators with the best-worst method in a semi-arid ecosystem. J. Arid Land 15, 779–796 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-023-0020-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-023-0020-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation