Abstract
The concept of education has been evolving to include social concerns in the teaching and learning process (Kärkkäinen, OECD Education working paper, 2012), bringing about more attention to distinct contexts and realities in which schooling occurs. This has led to an expansion of the concept of curricular contextualization in educational, political, and curricular discourses (Smith, Clearing 118:6–43, 2005; Dowden, Aust Educ Research, 34:51–71, 2007), nevertheless, this concept needs some clarification. This article does so through a literature review process, while contributing to knowledge production through the identification of theoretical perspectives concerning curricular contextualization. The literature review process enabled the definition and mapping of this concept, and the identification of five approaches through which curricular contextualization can be developed. These approaches are: curricular contextualization focused on the place, on the student, on the pedagogical practice, on the attention to diversity, and on disciplinary contents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ault, C. (2008). Achieving “querencia”: Integrating a sense of place with disciplined thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(5), 605–637. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2008.00438.x.
Beane, J. (2003). Integração curricular: A essência de uma escola democrática. Currículo Sem Fronteiras, 3(2), 91–110.
Bergamaschi, M. (2007). Educação escolar indígena: Um modo próprio de recriar a escola nas aldeias Guarani. Cadernos Cedes, 27(72), 197–213.
Bernhardt, P. (2009). Opening up classroom space: Student voice, autobiography, & the curriculum. The High School Journal, 92(3), 61–97.
Bernstein, B. (1998). Pedagogía, control simbólico e identidad: Teoría, investigación y crítica. Coruña: Fundación Paideia.
Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Validity and worth in the science curriculum: Learning school science outside the laboratory. Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 213–228. doi:10.1080/09585170600909662.
Buendía, E., Gitlin, A., & Doubia, F. (2003). Working the pedagogical borderlands: An African critical pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 33(3), 291–320. doi:10.1111/1467-873X.00264.
Bustos-Orosa, A. (2008). Inquiring into filipino teachers’ conceptions of good teaching: A qualitative research study. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 17(2), 173–189.
Choppin, J. (2009). Curriculum-context knowledge: Teacher learning from successive enactments of a standards-based mathematics curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(2), 287–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2009.00444.x.
Chung, J., & Chow, S. (2004). Promoting student learning through a student-centred problem-based learning subject curriculum. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 157–168. doi:10.1080/1470329042000208684.
Connell, R. (1993). Escuelas y justicia social. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x.
Crick, R. (2009). Inquiry-based learning: Reconciling the personal with the public in a democratic and archaeological pedagogy. Curriculum Journal, 20(1), 73–92. doi:10.1080/09585170902764021.
Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”? Educational Theory, 50(4), 427–448.
Davies, T. (2006). Creative teaching and learning in Europe: Promoting a new paradigm. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 37–57. doi:10.1080/09585170600682574.
Dowden, T. (2007). Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspectives from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 51–71.
Doyle, W. (2009). Situated practice: A reflection on person-centered classroom management. Theory into Pratice, 48(2), 156–159. doi:10.1080/00405840902776525.
Felício, H. (2010). Currículo e emancipação: Redimensionamento de uma escola instituída em um contexto advindo do processo de desfavelização. Currículo Sem Fronteiras, 10(2), 244–258.
Field, S., Kuczera, M., & Pont, B. (2007). Education and training policy: No more failures, ten steps to equity in education. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/50/45179151.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2011.
Fleuri, R. (2005). Intercultura e educação. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 23, 91–124.
Flutter, J. (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 343–354. doi:10.1080/09585170701589983.
Formosinho, J., & Machado, J. (2008). Currículo e organização: As equipas educativas como modelo de prática pedagógica. Currículo Sem Fronteiras, 8(1), 5–16.
Gillespie, M. (2002). EFF research principle: A contextualized approach to curriculum and instruction. EFF Research to Practice Note, 3, 2–8. Retrieved from http://www.edpubs.gov/document/ed001934w.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2011.
Goodson, I., & Crick, R. (2009). Curriculum as narration: Tales from the children of the colonized. Curriculum Journal, 20(3), 225–236. doi:10.1080/09585170903195852.
Grainger, T., Barnes, J., & Schoffham, S. (2004). A creative cocktail: Creative teaching in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 30(3), 243–253. doi:10.1080/0260747042000309475.
Gravoso, R. S., Pasa, A. E., Laba, J. B., & Mori, T. (2008). Design and use of instructional materials for student-centered learning: A case in learning ecological concepts. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 157–171.
Hancock, R., & Mansfield, M. (2002). The literacy hour: A case for listening to children. Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 183–200. doi:10.1080/09585170210136840.
Hartnell-Young, E., & Vetere, F. (2008). A means of personalizing learning: Incorporating old and new literacies in the curriculum with mobile phones. Curriculum Journal, 19(4), 283–292. doi:10.1080/09585170802509872.
Im, S., & Pak, S. (2012). Locality-based science education in sociocultural approach: “Scientific Exploration in Culture” in the context of Korea. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 63–70.
Kalbach, L., & Forester, L. (2006). The world and the world: A lesson in critical literacy and its impact on student achievement and self esteem. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 8(1–2), 69–82.
Kalchick, S., & Oertle, K. (2010). The theory and application of contextualized teaching and learning in relation to programs of study and career pathways. Transition Highlights, 2, 1–6.
Kärkkäinen, K. (2012). Bringing about curriculum innovations: Implicit approaches in the OECD area. OECD Education Working Papers, 82. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5k95qw8xzl8s.pdf?expires=1353945114&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=59BDC2846AED5D76CCC2B2700F2976B3. Accessed 05 July 2012.
Kemp, A. (2006). Engaging the environment: A case for a place-based curriculum. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 8(1/2), 125–142.
King, D., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2007). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 365–384. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9070-9.
Kitchens, J. (2009). Situated pedagogy and the situationist international: Countering a pedagogy of Placelessness. Educational Studies, 45, 240–261. doi:10.1080/00131940902910958.
Krippendorf, K. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Kumar, M., & Natarajan, U. (2007). A problem-based learning model: Showcasing an educational paradigm shift. Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 89–102. doi:10.1080/09585170701292216.
L’Écuyer, R. (1990). Méthodologie de l’analyse développementale de contenu. Canadá: Presses de l’Úniversité.
Leite, C. (2005b). A territorialização das políticas e das práticas educativas. In C. Leite (Org.), Mudanças curiculares em Portugal: Transição para o século XXI (pp. 15–32). Porto: Porto Editora.
Leite, C. (2012). A articulação curricular como sentido orientador dos projetos curriculares. Educação Unisinos, 16(nº 1), 87–92.
Leite, C., & Fernandes, P. (2008). Desafios de um currículo comprometido com a inclusão. In E. Macedo & A. Lopes (Orgs.), Políticas de currículo no Brasil e em Portugal (pp. 117–132). Porto: Profedições.
Leite, C., & Fernandes, P. (2010). Desafios aos professores na construção de mudanças educacionais e curriculares: que possibilidades e que constrangimentos? Educação, 33(3), 198–204.
Lawrence, M. (2007). Students as scientists: Synthesizing standards-based and student-appropriate instruction. Middle School Journal, 38(4), 30–37.
Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (1975). The delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Mazzeo, C. (2008). Supporting student success at California community colleges: A white paper. Prepared for the Bay Area Workforce Funding Collaborative Career by the Career Ladders Project for California Community Colleges.
Mfum-Mensah, O. (2009). An exploratory study of the curriculum development process of a complementary education program for marginalized communities in Northern Ghana. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(2), 343–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2009.00446.x.
Moch, P. (2004). Demonstrating knowledge of mathematics: Necessary but not sufficient. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 6(2), 125–130.
Morais, A., & Neves, I. (2009). Textos e contextos educativos que promovem aprendizagem: Optimização de um modelo de prática pedagógica. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 22(1), 5–28.
Moreira, A. (2007). A importância do conhecimento escolar em propostas curriculares alternativas. Educação em Revista, 45, 265–290.
Moreira, A., & Candau, V. (2003). Educação escolar e cultura(s): Construindo caminhos. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 23, 156–168.
Murphy, P., Lunn, S., & Jones, H. (2006). The impact of authentic learning on students’ engagement with physics. Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 229–246. doi:10.1080/09585170600909688.
Nascimento, A. (2010). Currículo, diferenças e identidades: Tendências da escola indígena Guarani e Kaiowá. Currículo Sem Fronteiras, 10(1), 113–132.
Nieveen, N., & Kuiper, W. (2012). Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in the Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 357–368. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357. Accessed 30 Oct 2012.
Paliwal, R., & Subramaniam, C. (2006). Contextualising the curriculum. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 4(1), 25–51.
Peck, C., Sears, A., & Donaldson, S. (2008). Unreached and unreasonable: Curriculum standards and children’s understanding of ethnic diversity in Canada. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(1), 63–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00398.x.
Queensland Studies Authority (2004). Chemistry: Extended trial pilot syllabus. Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland Studies Authority.
Sahasewiyon, K. (2004). Working locally as a true professional: Case studies in the development of a local curriculum. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 493–514. doi:10.1080/09650790400200265.
Sealey, P., & Noyes, A. (2010). On the relevance of the mathematics curriculum to young people. Curriculum Journal, 21(3), 239–253. doi:10(1080/09585176),2010,504573.
Shriner, M., Schlee, B., & Libler, R. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and beliefs regarding curriculum integration. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(1), 51–62. doi:10.1007/BF03216913.
Sleeter, C., & Stillman, J. (2005). Standardizing knowledge in a multicultural society. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2005.00314.x.
Smith, G. (2005). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Clearing, 118, 6–43.
Souto-Manning, M. (2008). Linking the words and the worlds through curriculum integration. Journal of Thought: A Journal of Critical Reflection on Educational Issues, 43(1–2), 95–103. Retrieved from http://www.freireproject.org/files/17souto.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2011.
Stemn, B. (2010). Teaching mathematics with “cultural eyes”. Race, Gender & Class, 17(1–2), 154–162.
Timperley, H., & Parr, J. (2009). What is this lesson about ? Instructional processes and student understandings in writing classrooms. Curriculum Journal, 20(1), 43–60. doi:10.1080/09585170902763999.
Wei, B. (2009). In search of meaningful integration: The experiences of developing integrated science curricula in junior secondary schools in China. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 259–277. doi:10.1080/09500690701687430.
Wu, H. (2010). Join the discussion: The construction of literacy learning during read-alouds in the bilingual classroom. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 12(1–2), 101–115.
Yamauchi, L. (2003). Making school relevant for at-risk students: The Wai’anae High School Hawaiian Studies Program. Journal of Education for Students Placed At-risk, 8(4), 379–390. doi:10.1207/S15327671ESPR0804_1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandes, P., Leite, C., Mouraz, A. et al. Curricular Contextualization: Tracking the Meanings of a Concept. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 22, 417–425 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0041-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0041-1