Abstract
Background
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the chronic administration of aerosolized iloprost for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
Methods
All the relevant studies were obtained from three databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, from the inception of each database to June 1, 2018. In our study, chronic treatment was defined as a period lasting at least 3 months. The rate of each event was analyzed by SPSS as a percentage with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For the meta-analysis, a randomized effect model or a fixed effect model was applied according to the results of the heterogeneity test.
Results
Ten studies were included in this study, with a total of 370 patients treated with inhaled iloprost, including 214 in five randomized controlled trials and 156 in five prospective clinical trials. Among the patients who received inhaled iloprost, there was a significant improvement in the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in the short-medium and prolonged treatment groups. Notably, the functionality improved by at least 1 class in 48.7% of the treated patients. In all the pooled studies, the estimated 3-month, 6-month, 1-year and 2-year event-free survival rates were 96.6%, 92.3%, 62.6% and 39.6%, respectively. In addition, there were eight adverse drug responses.
Conclusion
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, inhaled iloprost has been shown to be a safe and well-tolerated agent for PAH in the first 3 months after diagnosis. If used for a prolonged period, aerosol iloprost monotherapy could contribute to an unsatisfactory improvement in vascular remodeling and even a decreased event-free survival rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kang BJ, Lee SD, Oh YM, et al. Improved survival of Korean patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension after the introduction of targeted therapies. Heart Lung. 2014;43(6):561–8.
Galie N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(6):1219–63.
Galie N, Rubin L. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: epidemiology, pathobiology, assessment and therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:S1–90.
Benza RL, Miller DP, Barst RJ, et al. An evaluation of long-term survival from time of diagnosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension from the REVEAL Registry. Chest. 2012;142(2):448–56.
Galie N, Palazzini M, Manes A. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: from the kingdom of the near-dead to multiple clinical trial meta-analyses. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(17):2080–6.
Alehan D, Yıldırım I, Sahin M, et al. Long-term inhaled iloprost use in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cardiol Young. 2012;22(4):396–403.
Galia N, Manes A, Negro L, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(4):394–403.
Baker SE. Inhaled iloprost in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(7):1265–74.
Machherndl S, Kneussl M, Baumgartner H, et al. Long-term treatment of pulmonary hypertension with aerosolized iloprost. Eur Respir J. 2001;17(1):8–13.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Epidemiol Biostat Pub Health. 2009;6(4):e1–34 [J Clin Epidemiol. 2009,62(10): e1–34].
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol. 5. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. p. S38.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/ oxford.asp. Accessed Jan 2014.
Hoeper MM, Leuchte H, Halank M, et al. Combining inhaled iloprost with bosentan in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(4):691–4.
Olschewski H, Simonneau G, Galiè N, et al. Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension. New Engl J Med. 2002;11(6):19–23.
Mclaughlin VV, Oudiz RJ, Frost A, et al. Randomized study of adding inhaled iloprost to existing bosentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care. 2006;174(11):1257–63.
Frost A, Mclaughlin VV, Oudiz RJ, et al. STEP-OPEN LABEL EXTENSION: long-term benefits of inhaled iloprost addition to bosentan for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237111142. Accessed 14 Apr 2015
Olschewski H, Hoeper MM, Behr J, et al. Long-term therapy with inhaled iloprost in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Respir Med. 2010;104(5):731–40.
Hoeper MM, Schwarze M, Ehlerding S, et al. Long-term treatment of primary pulmonary hypertension with aerosolized iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1866–70.
Opitz CF, Wensel R, Winkler J, et al. Clinical efficacy and survival with first-line inhaled iloprost therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(18):1895–902.
Chon MK, Cho KI, Cha KS, et al. Effects of long-term iloprost treatment on right ventricular function in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. J Cardiol. 2017;69(5):741–6.
Saji T, Myoishi M, Sugimura K, et al. Efficacy and safety of inhaled iloprost in Japanese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension-Insights from the IBUKI and AIR studies. Circ J. 2016;80(4):835–42.
Cha KS, Cho KI, Seo JS, et al. Effects of inhaled iloprost on exercise capacity, quality of life, and cardiac function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to congenital heart disease (the Eisenmenger syndrome) (from the EIGER Study). Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(11):1834–9.
Widmar B. When cure is care: diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2005;17(3):104–12.
Zhang H, Li X, Huang J, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of prostacyclin analogs for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(4):e2575.
Frumkin LR. The pharmacological treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pharmacol Rev. 2012;64(3):583–620.
Tissot C, Beghetti M. Review of inhaled iloprost for the control of pulmonary artery hypertension in children. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5(1):325–31.
Galie N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, et al. Effects of beraprost sodium, an oral prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(9):1496–502.
Ryerson CJ, Nayar S, Swiston JR, et al. Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2010;11(1):1–10.
Coeytaux RR, Schmit KM, Kraft BD, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of drug therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2014;145(5):1055–63.
Liu HL, Chen XY, Li JR, et al. Efficacy and safety of PAH-specific therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Chest. 2016;150(2):353–66.
Zhang C, Huang Y, Huang T, et al. Effects of iloprost combined with low dose tadalafil in adult congenital heart disease patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension: a single-center, open-label controlled study. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014;42(6):474–80.
Han X, Zhang Y, Dong L, et al. Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension using initial combination therapy of bosentan and iloprost. Respir Care. 2017;62(4):489–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author contributions were as follows: HK and QL: study design, literature search, systematic review and data collection, statistical analysis, interpretation of results, and preparation of the manuscript; QY: a contribution to critical review of the manuscript; TL: principal investigator, study design, statistical analysis and an assessment of all results. The typographical and grammatical errors were checked and corrected by the authors above. The corresponding author confirmed all contributing authors gave permission to be named. TL takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Hongyu Kuang, Qiang Li, Qijian Yi and Tiewei Lu declare they have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuang, H., Li, Q., Yi, Q. et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Aerosolized Iloprost in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 19, 393–401 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-018-00324-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-018-00324-2