Skip to main content
Log in

Reflectance Based Models for Non-Destructive Prediction of Lycopene Content in Tomato Fruits

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lycopene is a pigment present in tomato fruits with multiple health benefits. Thereby, non-destructive and simple methods of lycopene estimation are needed. In the present investigation, hyperspectral technique was used towards the development of models for prediction of lycopene content in tomato fruits. Tomato fruits of four varieties at six different ripening stages were either harvested directly from the plants or obtained during the period of postharvest storage. Reflectance of individual tomato fruit was recorded at each wavelength in a spectrum of 350–2500 nm. Subsequently, actual estimation of lycopene content was done. Thereafter, reflectance values and actual lycopene content data were subjected to chemometric analysis. The best model was y [lycopene content, µg g−1 fresh weight (FW)] = 0.1713x−1.789 where x is reflectance at 546 nm (R546). This model can accurately predict the lycopene content for a difference of ≥ 5.04 with biasness of 0.10. The second-best model was y = 0.0726x2 + 0.3272x + 0.5482 where x is inverse of reflectance at 550 nm (1/R550). This model had predictability of ≥ 5.06 with biasness of 0.67. The developed models were valid across the varieties, ripening stages, and ripening conditions i.e., plant harvested (fresh fruits) and stored (aged fruits). The findings will prove useful in development of non-destructive, cost-effective, and simple tools for rapid monitoring, sorting, grading, and phenotyping of tomato fruits based on their lycopene content. This in turn will be of immense use for processing, value-addition, pharmaceutical, and marketing of tomato fruits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali MY, Sina AAI, Khandker SS, Neesa L, Tanvir EM, Kabir A, Khalil MI, Gan SH (2021) Nutritional composition and bioactive compounds in tomatoes and their impact on human health and disease: a review. Foods 10:45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen ML, Schwartz SJ (1999) Lycopene: chemical and biological properties. Food Technol 53:38–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Stefani E, Oreggia F, Boffetta P, Deneo-Pellegrini H, Ronco A, Mendilaharsu M (2000) Tomatoes, tomato-rich foods, lycopene and cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract: a case-control in Uruguay. Oral Oncol 36:47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma L, Ramesh KV, Paul V, Pandey R (2020) Ripening index: a better parameter for colour based assessment of ripening behavior of tomato fruits. Plant Physiol Rep 25:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar R, Paul V, Pandey R, Sahoo RN, Gupta VK (2022) Reflectance based non-destructive determination of colour and ripeness of tomato fruits. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 28:275–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosales MA, Cervilla LM, Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi MDM, Blasco B, Ríos JJ, Soriano T, Castilla N, Romero L, Ruiz JM (2010) The effect of environmental conditions on nutritional quality of cherry tomato fruits: evaluation of two experimental Mediterranean greenhouses. J Sci Food Agric 91:152–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Lucca GD, Grolier P (2002) Review of the influence of major environmental and agronomic factors on the lycopene content of tomato fruit. Acta Hortic 579:595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hussain A, Pu H, Sun DW (2018) Measurements of lycopene contents in fruit: a review of recent developments in conventional and novel techniques. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59:758–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao J, Kechasov D, Rewald B, Bodner G, Verheul M, Clarke N, Clarke JL (2020) Deep learning in hyperspectral image reconstruction from single RGB images-A case study on tomato quality parameters. Remote Sens 12:3258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alenazi MM, Shafiq M, Alsadon AA, Alhelal IM, Alhamdan AM, Solieman TH, Ibrahim AA, Shady MR, Saad MA (2020) Non-destructive assessment of flesh firmness and dietary antioxidants of greenhouse-grown tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at different fruit maturity stages. Saudi J Biol Sci 27:2839–2846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar R, Paul V, Pandey R, Sahoo RN, Gupta VK, Asrey R, Jha SK (2022) Reflectance based non-destructive assessment of tomato fruit firmness. Plant Physiol Rep (Under review)

  12. Campbell AD, Huysamer M, Stotz HU, Greve LC, Labavitch JM (1990) Comparison of ripening processes in intact tomato fruit and excised pericarp discs. Plant Physiol 94:1582–1589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lana MM, Tijskens LMM, Kooten OV (2006) Effect of storage temperature and stage of ripening on RGB colour aspects of fresh-cut tomato pericarp using video image analysis. J Food Eng 77:871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis A, Fish WW, Perkins-Veazi P (2003) A rapid spectrophotometric method for analyzing lycopene content in tomato and tomato products. Postharvest Biol Technol 28:425–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kusumiyati AT, Tanaka M, Kawasaki S (2008) On tree and after harvesting evaluation of firmness, color and lycopene content of tomato fruit using portable NIR spectroscopy. J Food Agric Environ 6:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kavitha P, Shivashankara KS, Rao VK, Sadashiva AT, Ravishankar KV, Sathish GJ (2013) Genotypic variability for antioxidant and quality parameters among tomato cultivars, hybrids, cherry tomato and wild species. J Sci Food Agric 94:993–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clement A, Bacon R, Sirois S, Dorais M (2015) Mature-ripe tomato spectral classification according to lycopene content and fruit type by visible, NIR reflectance and intrinsic fluorescence. Qual Assur Saf Crop Foods 7:747–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Szuvandzsiev P, Helyes L, Lugasi A, Szanto C, Baranowski P, Pek Z (2014) Estimation of antioxidant components of tomato using VIS-NIR reflectance data by handheld portable spectrometer. Int Agrophys 28:521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choudhary R, Bowser TJ, Weckler P, Maness NO, McGlynn W (2009) Rapid estimation of lycopene concentration in watermelon and tomato puree by fiber optic visible reflectance spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol Technol 52:103–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson GH, Mahoney NE, Goodman N, Pavlath AE (1995) Regulation of lycopene formation in cell suspension culture of VFNT tomato (Lycopersicon sculentum) by CPTA, growth regulators, sucrose, and temperature. J Exp Bot 46:667–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G, Grolier P (2003) Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric 83:369–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu Q, He C, Lu R, Mendoza F, Cen H (2015) Ripeness evaluation of ‘Sun Bright’ tomato using optical absorption and scattering properties. Postharvest Biol Technol 103:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li T, Zhong C, Lou W, Wei M, Hou J (2017) Optimization of characteristic wavelengths in prediction of lycopene in tomatoes using near-infrared spectroscopy. J Food Process Eng 40:e12266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheng R, Cheng W, Li H, Ali S, Agyekum AA, Chen Q (2019) Model development for soluble solids and lycopene contents of cherry tomato at different temperatures using near-infrared spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol Technol 156:110952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Akpolat H, Barineau M, Jackson KA, Akpolat MZ, Francis DM, Chen YJ, Rodriguez-Saona LE (2020) High-throughput phenotyping approach for screening major carotenoids of tomato by handheld Raman spectroscopy using chemometric methods. Sensors 20:3723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Berra WG (2012) Visible/near infrared spectroscopy method for the prediction of lycopene in tomato (Lycopearsicon esculentum Mill) fruits. J Sci Technol Arts 1:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pedro AM, Ferreira MM (2005) Non-destructive determination of solids and carotenoids in tomato products by near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration. Anal Chem 77:2505–2511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen L (2008) Non-destructive measurement of tomato quality using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. M. Sc. Thesis, McGill University, Canada

  29. Saad AG, Jaiswal P, Jha SN (2014) Non-destructive quality evaluation of intact tomato using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. Int J Adv Res 2:632–639

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deak K, Szigedi T, Pek Z, Baranowski P, Helyes L (2015) Carotenoid determination in tomato juice using near infrared spectroscopy. Int Agrophys 29:275–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The able technical assistance provided by Atar Singh (Division of Plant Physiology, IARI) is thankfully acknowledged.

Funding

Authors wish to convey sincere thanks to ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, India for financial support to the in-house project entitled ‘‘Integrated pre and postharvest management for loss reduction and quality retention in fruits and vegetable’’ (2014 -2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VP and RP designed the experiments and collected the samples. RK carried out the work. RNS and VKG recorded reflectance data. All the authors have contributed equally in analyzing the data, writing of the manuscript, gone through it and approved it for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay Paul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Significance Statement: Lycopene content in tomato fruit is a key trait. Simple reflectance-based models were developed for non-destructive assessment of lycopene content in tomato fruits. The models were valid across varieties and ripening stages and ripening conditions. In future, this will assist in automated screening and sorting of tomato fruits.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Paul, V., Pandey, R. et al. Reflectance Based Models for Non-Destructive Prediction of Lycopene Content in Tomato Fruits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci. 92, 759–769 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01372-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-022-01372-0

Keywords

Navigation