Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Airborne LiDAR Technology: A Review of Data Collection and Processing Systems

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has now become industry standard tool for collecting accurate and dense topographic data at very high speed. These data have found use in many applications and several new applications are being discovered regularly. This paper presents a review of the current state-of-the-art of this technology. The paper covers both data capture and data processing issues of the technology. The paper first discusses various types of LiDAR sensors and their working. This is followed by information on data format and data quality assessment procedures. The paper reviews the existing data classification techniques and also looks into the new approaches like convolutional neural networks and visual analytics for data processing. Finally, the paper outlines future scope of the technology and the research challenges, which should be addressed in coming years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ritchie JD (1996) Airborne laser altimeters, remote sensing applications to hydrology. Hydrol Sci J 41(4):625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rempel RC, Parker AK (1964) An information note on an airborne laser terrain pprofile for micro-relief studies. In: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on remote sensing of environment, University of Michigan Institute of Science and Technology

  3. Hickman GD, Hogg JE (1969) Application of an airborne pulsed laser for near shore bathymetric measurements. Remote Sens Environ 1:47–58

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoge FE (1988) Airborne oceanographic LiDAR (AOL) flight mission participation. In: Laboratory for oceans. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, pp 95–97

  5. Krabill WB, Collins JG, Link LE, Swift RN, Butler ML (1984) Airborne laser topographic mapping results. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 50:685–694

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schreier H, Lougheed J, Tucker C, Leckie D (1983) Automated measurements of terrain reflection and height variations using and Airborne infrared laser system. Int J Remote Sens 6(1):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoge FE (1974) Integrated laser/radar satellite ranging and tracking system. Appl Opt 13(10):2352–2358

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arp H, Griesba JC, Burns JP (1982) Mapping in tropical forests: a new approach using the laser APR. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 48(1):91–100

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofton MA et al (2000) An airborne laser altimetry survey of Long Valley California. Int J Remote Sens 21(12):2413–2437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner W, Ullrich A, Ducic V, Melzer T, Studnicka N (2006) Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitizing airborne laser scanner. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 60(2):100–112

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Doneus M, Briese C, Fera M, Janner M (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. J Archaeol Sci 35(4):882–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiaoliang Z, Guihua Z, Jonathan L, Yuanxi Y, Yong F (2016) 3D land cover classification based on multispectral LiDAR point clouds. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 41(B1):741–747

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stoker JM, Abdullah QA, Nayegandhi A, Winehouse J (2016) Evaluation of single photon and geiger mode lidar for the 3D elevation program. Remote Sens 8(9):767

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dashora A (2013) Optimization system for flight planning for airborne LiDAR data aquisition. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dashora A, Lohani B (2013) LiDAR technology and a new method of flight planning for airborne LiDAR data acquisition. In: ISRS–ISG conference, Vishakhapattanam

  16. Dashora A, Lohani B, Deb K (2014) Method of flight planning for airborne LiDAR using genetic algorithms. SPIE J Appl Remote Sens 8(1):1–19

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Dashora A, Lohani B, Deb K (2014) LiDAR flight planning—a new system for flight planning with minimal user intervention. GIM Int Mag. https://www.gim-international.com/content/article/lidar-flight-planning

  18. Dashora A, Lohani B, Deb K (2013) Turning mechanisms for airborne LiDAR and photographic data acquisition. SPIE J Appl Remote Sens 7(1):1–19

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dashora A, Lohani B, Deb K (2013) Two-step procedure of optimization for solving the flight planning problem for airborne LiDAR data acquisition. Int J Math Model Numer Optim 4(4):323–350

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Dashora A, Lohani B, Deb K (2012) Flight planning system for airborne data acquisition

  21. ASPRS (2011) ASPRS LAS format standard 1.4

  22. Heidemann HK (2014) Lidar base specification (ver. 1.2, November 2014) (USGS)

  23. Casella V, Spalla A (2000) Estimation of horizontal accuracy of laser scanning data. Proposal of a method exploiting ramps. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens 33(B3):157–163

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vosselman G (2008) Analysis of planimetric accuracy of airborne laser scanning surveys. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVII(B3a):99–104

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kreylos O, Bawden GW, Kellogg LH (2008) Immersive visualization and analysis of LiDAR data. In: Bebis G et al (eds) Advances in visual computing. ISVC 2008. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5358. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  26. Richter R, Döllner J (2010) Out-of-core real-time visualization of massive 3D point clouds. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa. ACM, Franschhoek, pp 121–128

  27. Stoker JM (2004) Voxels as a representation of multiple-return lidar data. In: Proceedings of ASPRS annual conference, Denver

  28. Stoker JM (2009) Volumetric visualization of multiple-return LIDAR data: using voxels. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 75(2):109–112

    Google Scholar 

  29. Isenburg M, Liu Y, Shewchuk J, Snoeyink J, Thirion T (2006) Generating raster DEM from mass points via TIN streaming. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on geographic information science

  30. Ghosh S, Lohani B (2015) Development and comparison of aerial photograph aided visualization pipelines for LiDAR datasets. Int J Digital Earth 8(8):656–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghosh S, Lohani B (2013) Mining LiDAR data with spatial clustering algorithms. Int J Remote Sens 34(14):5119–5135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander Jo, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD-96). AAAI Press, pp 226–231

  33. Ankrest M, Breunig M, Kriegel HP, Sander J (1999) OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. In Proceedings of ACM, SIGMOD’99

  34. Ghosh S, Lohani B, Misra N (2014) A study-based ranking of LiDAR data visualization schemes aided by georectified aerial images. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 41(2):138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sithole G, Vosselman G (2004) Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 59:85–101

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kobler A et al (2007) Repetitive interpolation: a robust algorithm for DTM generation from Aerial laser scanner data in forested terrain. Remote Sens Environ 108:9–23

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pfeifer N, Mandlburger G (2008) LiDAR data filtering and DTM generation. In: Topographic laser ranging and scanning: principles and processing, pp 308–333

  38. Meng X, Currit N, Zhao K (2010) Ground filtering algorithms for airborne LiDAR data: a review of critical issues. Remote Sens 2(3):833–860

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sithole G, Vosselman G (2003) Automatic structure detection in a point-cloud of an urban landscape. In 2nd GRSS/ISPRS joint workshop on remote sensing and data fusion over urban areas, pp 67–71

  40. Błaszczak-Bąk W, Janowski A, Kamiński W, Rapinski J (2011) Optimization algorithm and filtration using the adaptive TIN model at the stage of initial processing of the ALS point cloud. Can J Remote Sens 37(6):583–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Roggero M (2001) Airborne laser scanning: clustering in raw data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens 3/W4 34:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sithole G (2001) Filtering of laser altimetry data using a slope adaptive filter. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXIV(3/4):203–210

    Google Scholar 

  43. Filin S, Pfeifer N (2006) Segmentation of airborne laser scanning data using a slope adaptive neighbourhood. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 60:71–80

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Meng X, Wang L, Silván-Cárdenas JL, Currit N (2009) A multi-directional ground filtering algorithm for airborne LIDAR. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64(1):117–124

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Elmqvist M (2002) Ground surface estimation from airborne laser scanner data using active shape models. In: Photogrammetric computer vision, ISPRS commission III symposium, Graz

  46. Elmqvist M (2001) Ground estimation of laser radar data using active shape models. In: OOPE workshop on airborne laser scanning and interferometric SAR for detailed digital elevation models

  47. Axelsson P (2000) DEM Generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. In IAPRS, XXXIII, B4/1, Amsterdam

  48. Axelsson P (1999) Processing of laser scanner data—algorithms and applications. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 54(2–3):138–147

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sohn G, Dowman I (2002) Terrain surface reconstruction by the use of tetrahedron model with the MDL Criterion. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXIV(Pt. 3A):336–344

    Google Scholar 

  50. Brovelli MA, Cannata M, Longoni UM (2004) LIDAR data filtering and DTM interpolation within GRASS. Trans GIS 8(2):155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Brovelli MA, Cannata M, Longoni UM (2002) Managing and processing LIDAR data within GRASS. In: Proceedings of GRASS users conference, Trento, Italy, 11–13 Sept, p 29

  52. Kraus K, Pfeifer N (1997) A new method for surface reconstruction from laser scanner data. In: IAPRS, XXXII, 3/2W3, Haifa, Israel

  53. Lohmann P, Koch A, Schäffer M (2000) Approaches to the filtering of laser scanner data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens XXXIII(B3/1):534–541

    Google Scholar 

  54. Overby J, Bodum L, Kjems E, Iisoe PM (2004) Automatic 3D building reconstruction from airborne laser scanning and cadastral data using Hough transform. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens XXXV(B3):296–301

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tarsha-Kurdi F, Landes T, Grussenmeyer P (2007) Hough-transform and extended RANSAC Algorithms for automatic detection of 3D building roof planes from LiDAR data. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Espoo

  56. Nardinocchi C, Scaioni M, Forlani G (2001) Building extraction from LIDAR data. In: Remote sensing and data fusion over urban areas, IEEE/ISPRS joint workshop 2001, pp 79–84

  57. Bretar F (2008) Feature extraction from LiDAR data in urban areas. In: Topographic laser ranging and scanning: principles and processing, pp 403–419

  58. Tseng Y-H, Wang M (2005) Automatic plane extraction from LIDAR data based on octree splitting and merging segmentation. In Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2005. IGARSS ‘05. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International, pp 3281–3284

  59. Hofmann AD, Maas H-G, Streilein A (2003) Derivation of roof types by cluster analysis in parameter spaces of airborne laserscanner point clouds. In ISPRS commission III WG3, workshop, 3-D reconstruction from airborne laserscanner and InSAR data, IAPRS international archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol 34, part 3/W13, pp 112–117

  60. Morgan M, Habib A (2002) Interpolation of LiDAR data and automatic building extraction. In: ACSM-ASPRS 2002 annual conference proceedings

  61. Tse R, Gold C, Kidner D (2007) Using the delaunay triangulation/voronoi diagram to extract building information from raw LIDAR data. In 4th International symposium on voronoi diagrams in science and engineering, 2007. ISVD ‘07, pp 222–229

  62. Oude Elberink S, Vosselman G (2009) Building reconstruction by target based graph matching on incomplete laser data: analysis and limitations. Sensors 9(8):6101–6118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Cho W, Jwa Y-S, Chang H-J, Lee S-H (2004) Pseudo-grid based building extraction using airborne LIDAR data. In International archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing, pp 378–381

  64. Maas HG, Vosselman G (1999) Two algorithms for extracting building models from raw laser altimetry data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 54:153–163

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Hough PVC (1962) Methods and means for recognizing complex patterns

  66. Lohani B, Singh R (2008) Effect of data density, scan angle, and flying height on the accuracy of building extraction using LiDAR data. Geocarto Int 23(2):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Fischler MA, Bolles RC (1981) Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM 24(6):381–395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  68. Forlani G, Nardinocchi C, Scaioni M, Zingaretti P (2006) Complete classification of raw LIDAR data and 3D reconstruction of buildings. Pattern Anal Appl 8:357–374

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. Forlani G, Nardinocchi C, Scaioni M, Zingaretti P (2003) Building reconstruction and visualization from LiDAR data. In: The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Ancona

  70. Auer S, Hinz S (2007) Automatic extraction of salient geometric entities from LIDAR point clouds. In Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2007. IGARSS 2007. IEEE International, pp 2507–2510

  71. Donald M (1980) Octree encoding: a new technique for the representation, manipulation and display of arbitrary 3-D objects by computer. Rensselaer Polytecnic Institute, Troy

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ming-Kuei H (1962) Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 8(2):179–187

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Maas H-G (1999) Closed solutions for the determination of parametric building models from invariant moments of airborne laserscanner data. In ISPRS conference ‘Automatic extraction of GIS objects from digital imagery’, Munich, September 6–10, pp 193–199

  74. Maas HG (1999) Fast determination of parametric house models from dense airborne laserscanner data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens XXXII(2W1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rottensteiner F, Jansa J (2002) Automatic extraction of buildings from lidar data and aerial images. In ISPRS commission IV, symposium, Ottawa

  76. Brenner C, Haala N, Fritsch D (2001) Towards fully automated 3D city model generation. In: Ascona01, pp 47–57

  77. Laycock RG, Day AM (2003) Rapid generation of urban models. Comput Gr 27(3):423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Huber M, Schickler W, Hinz S, Baumgartner A (2003) Fusion of LiDAR data and aerial imagery for automatic reconstruction of building surfaces. In: 2nd GRSS/ISPRS workshop on “Data fusion and remote sensing over urban areas”, pp 82–86

  79. Sampath A, Shan J (2010) Segmentation and reconstruction of polyhedral building roofs from aerial lidar point clouds. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(3):1554–1567

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. Teo TA, Rau JY, Chen LC, Liu JK, Hsu WC (2006) Reconstruction of complex buildings using LIDAR and 2D maps. In: Abdul-Rahman A, Zlatanova S, Coors V (eds) Innovations in 3D geo information systems. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  81. Zaharia T, Prêteux F (2002) Shape based retrieval of 3D mesh models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo, 2002. ICME’02, pp 437–440

  82. Chen L-C, Teo T-A, Kuo C-Y, Rau J-Y (2008) Shaping polyhedral buildings by the fusion of vector maps and lidar point clouds. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 74(9):1147–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Hyyppä J et al. (2008) Forest inventory using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. In: Topographic laser ranging and scanning: principles and processing, pp 335–370

  84. Fujisaki I et al (2008) Stand assessment through LiDAR-based forest visualization using a stereoscopic display. For Sci 54(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  85. Morsdorf F, Meier E, Allgöwer B, Nüesch D (2003) Clustering in airborne laser scanning raw data for segmentation of single trees. In: International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

  86. Morsdorf F et al (2004) LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management. Remote Sens Environ 92:353–362

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. Hyyppä J, Inkinen M (1999) Detecting and estimating attributes for single trees using laser scanner. Photogramm J Finl 16:27–42

    Google Scholar 

  88. Friedlaender H, Koch B (2006) First experience in the application of laser scanner data for the assessment of vertical and horizontal forest structures. In: International archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing, vol XXXIII, B7. ISPRS Congress, Amsterdam

  89. Brandtberg T, Warner T, Landenberger R, McGraw J (2003) Detection and analysis of individual tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density LiDAR data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America. Remote Sens Environ 85:290–303

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. Tiede D, Hoffman C (2006) Process oriented object-based algorithms for single tree detection using laser scanning. In International workshop 3D remote sensing in forestry proceedings, Vienna, 14–15 Feb 2006

  91. Oehlke C, Richter R, Döllner J (2015) Automatic detection and large-scale visualization of trees for digital landscapes and city models based on 3D point clouds. In: 16th Conference on digital landscape architecture (DLA 2015), pp 151–160

  92. Shamayleh H, Khattak A (2003) Utilization of LiDAR technology for highway inventory. In Proceedings of the 2003 mid-continent transportation research symposium, Ames

  93. Harvey WA, McKeown Jr. DM (2008) Automatic compilation of 3D road features using LIDAR and multi-spectral source data. In: ASPRS 2008

  94. Tiwari P, Pande H, Pandey A (2009) Automatic urban road extraction using airborne laser scanning/altimetry and high resolution satellite data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Vosselman G (2003) 3D reconstruction of roads and trees for city modelling. In: 3-D reconstruction from airborne laserscanner and InSAR data, Dresden

  96. Oude Elberink S, Vosselman G (2006) 3D modelling of topographic objects by fusing 2D maps and lidar data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVI(4):27–30

    Google Scholar 

  97. Clode S, Rottensteiner F, Kootsookos PJ (2005) Improving city model determination by using road detection from LiDAR data. In: Joint workshop of ISPRS and the German Association for Pattern Recognition (DAGM), ‘Object extraction for 3D city models, road databases and traffic monitoring—concepts, algorithms, and evaluation’ (CMRT05), Vienna

  98. Zhu P, Lu Z, Chen X, Honda K, Eiumnoh A (2004) Extraction of city roads through shadow path reconstruction using laser data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70(12):1433–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Choi Y-W, Jang Y-W, Lee H-J, Cho G-S (2008) Three-dimensional LiDAR data classifying to extract road point in urban area. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 5(4):725–729

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. Samadzadegan F, Hahn M, Bigdeli B (2009) Automatic road extraction from LIDAR data based on classifier fusion. In: Urban remote sensing event, 2009 joint, pp 1–6

  101. Zhao J, You S, Huang J (2011) Rapid extraction and updating of road network from airborne LiDAR data. In: Applied imagery pattern recognition workshop (AIPR). IEEE, pp 1–7

  102. Clode S, Rottensteiner F (2005) Classification of trees and powerlines from medium resolution airborne laserscanner data in urban environments. In: WDIC, pp 191–196

  103. Sithole G, Vosselman G (2005) Filtering of airborne laser scanner data based on segmented point clouds. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVI(3/W19):66–71

    Google Scholar 

  104. Shan J, Sampath A (2005) Urban DEM generation from raw lidar data: a labelling algorithm and its performance. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 71(2):217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Chehata N, David N, Bretar F (2008) LIDAR Data Classification using Hierarchical k-means clustering. In: International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Beijing, pp 325–330

  106. Samadzadegan F, Bigdeli B, Ramzi P (2010) A multiple classifier system for classification of LIDAR remote sensing data using multi-class SVM. In: El Gayar N, Kittler J, Roli F (eds) Multiple classifier systems. MCS 2010. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5997. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  107. Brattberg O, Tolt G (2008) Terrain classification using airborne lidar data and aerial imagery. In: The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Beijing, pp 261–266

  108. Kumari B, Ashe A, Sreevalsan Nair J (2014) Remote interactive visualization of parallel implementation of structural feature extraction of three-dimensional lidar point cloud. In: Third international conference big data analytics, BDA 2014. New Delhi, India, 2–23 December 2014. Springer, pp 129–132

  109. NVIDIA (2008) NVIDIA CUDA programming guide 2.0, NVIDIA Corporation

  110. Keller P et al (2011) Extracting and visualizing structural features in environmental point cloud LiDaR data sets. In: Topological methods in data analysis and visualization: theory, algorithms, and applications, Springer, pp 179–192

  111. Kumari B, Sreevalsan-Nair J (2015) An interactive visual analytic tool for semantic classification of 3D urban LiDAR point cloud. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, ACM, Seattle, pp 71–73

  112. Kumari B (2016) Visualization techniques in classification of 3D urban LiDAR point cloud. Master of Science by Research, IIIT Bangalore

  113. Sreevalsan Nair J, Kumari B (2017) Local geometric descriptors for multi-scale probabilistic point classification of airborne LiDAR point clouds. Mathematics and Visualization 1–26 (preprint)

  114. Sreevalsan-Nair J, Jindal A (2017) Using gradients and tensor voting in 3D local geometric descriptors for feature detection in airborne LiDAR point clouds in urban regions. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2017 (to appear)

  115. Felsberg M, Köthe U (2005) GET: the connection between monogenic scale-space and Gaussian derivatives. In: Scale space and PDE methods in computer vision, Springer, Berlin, pp 192–203

  116. Kumar B, Lohani B, Pandey G (2017) Development of deep learning architecture for automatic classification of mobile LiDAR data. Int J Phtogramm Remote Sens (communicated)

  117. Biswas S, Lohani B (2008) Development of high resolution 3D sound propagation model using LiDAR data and aerial photo. In: The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Beijing

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India

    Bharat Lohani

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, MGM’s Jawaharlal Nehru Engineering College, Aurangabad, India

    Suddhasheel Ghosh

Authors
  1. Bharat Lohani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suddhasheel Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharat Lohani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lohani, B., Ghosh, S. Airborne LiDAR Technology: A Review of Data Collection and Processing Systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 87, 567–579 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-017-0435-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-017-0435-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation