Abstract
The species-area theory (SAT) is an important research platform for ecology and biodiversity conservation. Traditionally, the SAT is described using the algebra method, without considering taxonomic characteristic differences between species. Here, we use the branch of mathematics known as set theory to reformulate the SAT, including the species-area relationship, endemic-area relationship, overlap-area relationship, and alpha, beta, and gamma diversity. Then fundamental equations are derived by this method: (1) the number of species in one area can be divided into two parts: species (endemic species) in only this area, and species (overlapping species) in both the focal and neighboring area. The total number of species in these two areas is equal to the sum of the number of species in one of the two areas and the number of species existing only in the other area. (2) A new definition of beta diversity is proposed to describe the overlapping species distribution among the local alpha diversity in the whole gamma diversity. Therefore, gamma diversity is the union of all alpha diversity or the union of all beta diversity.
References
Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9:95–99
He F, Hubbell SP (2011) Species-area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature 473:368–371
Fattorini S, Borges PAV (2012) Species-area relationships underestimate extinction rates. Acta Oecol 40:27–30
Pan XB (2013) Fundamental equations for species-area theory. Sci Rep 3:1334
Turner WR, Tjørve E (2005) Scale-dependence in species-area relationships. Ecography 28:721–730
Harte J, Kinzig AP (1997) On the implications of species-area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food web patterns. Oikos 80:417–427
Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol 11:37–50
Tuomisto H (2010) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33:2–22
Sørensen TA (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content, and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Biol Skr 5:1–34
Tjørve E, Tjørve KMC (2008) The species-area relationship, self-similarity, and the true meaning of the z-value. Ecology 89:353–3528
Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2008) Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Reply. Ecology 89:3244–3256
Tuomisto H (2010) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena. Ecography 33:23–45
Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Eco Biogeogr 19:134–143
Pyke CR, Condit R, Aguilar S, Lao S (2001) Floristic composition across a climatic gradient in a neotropical lowland forest. J Veg Sci 12:553–566
Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Nunez P, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP (2002) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669
Acknowledgments
I warmly thank Xuejun Dong, Bob Patton, and Fengqiao Liu for the helpful suggestions for the manuscript revision. The work is supported by the Basic Scientific Research Foundation of Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine (No. 2014JK014 and 2014JK015) and Public Welfare Project for Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (No. 201310091 and 201410080). Pan X. also thanks for personal financial support from Scientific Research Foundations for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Ministry of Labour and Social Security and Ministry of Education, the People's Republic of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, X. Reconstruct Species-Area Theory Using Set Theory. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 38, 173–177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-014-0319-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-014-0319-3