Skip to main content
Log in

Nanocomposite bioactive polymeric scaffold promotes adhesion, proliferation and osteogenesis of rat bone marrow stromal cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Synthetic degradable polymer scaffolds have often shown poor cell affinity and bone bioactivity. Bioactive inorganic nanoadditives with the composition of calcium silicate in amorphous phase (CSN) were incorporated within poly (lactic acid) (PLA) to develop nanocomposite bone scaffolds. Nanocomposite solutions containing PLA with 10% CSN were porous-structured by a salt-impregnation / leaching method. The nanocomposite scaffold showed higher dynamical mechanical modulus values than the pure PLA equivalent, indicating a proper usage for hard tissue scaffolds. Rat bone marrow stromal cells (rBMSCs) were cultured on the scaffolds and the cell adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation at gene and protein levels were addressed. Cells adhered better on the nanocomposite scaffold with respect to PLA equivalent, and then proliferated more during the culture periods of up to 7 days. The expression of osteogenic genes, including collagen type I, osteopontin, osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase, were significantly stimulated on the nanocomposite scaffold, as confirmed by a real time polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, Western blot analysis indicated higher expression of osteopontin protein of cells by the nanocomposite scaffold. Results demonstrated the bioactive nanocomposite scaffolds provided appropriate matrix conditions for rBMSCs to populate on and to undergo osteogenic processes in vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PK Yarlagadda, M Chandrasekharan, JY Shyan, Recent advances and current developments in tissue scaffolding, Biomed Mater Eng, 15, 159 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. RA Perez, HW Kim, MP Ginebra, Polymeric additives to enhance the functional properties of calcium phosphate cements, J Tissue Eng, 3, 2041731412439555 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. KA Athanasiou, C Zhu, DR Lanctot, et al., Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone, Tissue Eng, 6, 361 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. NG Sahoo, YZ Pan, L Li, et al., Nanocomposites for bone tissue regeneration, Nanomedicine (Lond), 8, 639 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C Du, FZ Cui, XD Zhu, et al., Three-dimensional nano-HAp/collagen matrix loading with osteogenic cells in organ culture, J Biomed Mater Res, 44, 407 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. RZ Wang, FZ Cui, HB Lu, et al., Synthesis of nanophase hydroxyapatite-collagen composite, J Mater Sci Lett, 14, 490 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. JH Song, HE Kim, HW Kim, Collagen-apatite nanocomposite membranes for guided bone regeneration, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 83, 248 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. HW Kim, HJ Gu, HH Lee, Microspheres of collagen-apatite nanocomposites with osteogenic potential for tissue engineering, Tissue Eng, 13, 965 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JH Song, HE Kim, HW Kim, Electrospun fibrous web of collagen-apatite precipitated nanocomposite for bone regeneration, J Mater Sci Mater Med, 19, 2925 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shin SH, Purevdorj O, Oscar C, Planell JA, Kim HW. A short review: recent advances in electrospinning for bone tissue regeneration, J Tissue Eng, 3, 2041731412443530 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. HW Kim, Biomedical nanocomposites of hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone obtained by surfactant mediation, J Biomed Mater Res A, 83, 169 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. SH Jegal, JH Park, JH Kim, et al., Functional composite nanofibers of poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) containing gelatinapatite bone mimetic precipitate for bone regeneration, Acta Biomater, 7, 1609 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. JE Won, A El-Fiqi, SH Jegal, et al., Gelatin-apatite bone mimetic co-precipitates incorporated within biopolymer matrix to improve mechanical and biological properties useful for hard tissue repair, J Biomater Appl, 28, 1213 (2014).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. HW Kim, HH Lee, JC Knowles, Electrospinning biomedical nanocomposite fibers of hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic acid) for bone regeneration, J Biomed Mater Res A, 79, 643 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. RK Singh, KD Patel, JH Lee, et al., Potential of magnetic nanofiber scaffolds with mechanical and biological properties applicable for bone regeneration, PLoS One, 9, e91584 (2014).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. JH Jo, EJ Lee, DS Shin, et al., In vitro/in vivo biocompatibility and mechanical properties of bioactive glass nanofiber and poly (epsilon-caprolactone) composite materials, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 91, 213 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. HH Lee, HS Yu, JH Jang JH, et al., Bioactivity improvement of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) membrane with the addition of nanofibrous bioactive glass, Acta Biomater, 4, 622 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. HW Kim, JH Song, HE Kim, Bioactive glass nanofibercollagen nanocomposite as a novel bone regeneration matrix, J Biomed Mater Res A, 79, 698 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. A El-Fiqi, JH Lee, EJ Lee, et al., Collagen hydrogels incorporated with surface-aminated mesoporous nanobioactive glass: Improvement of physicochemical stability and mechanical properties is effective for hard tissue engineering, Acta Biomater, 9, 9508 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A El-Fiqi, TH Kim, M Kim, et al., Capacity of mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles to deliver therapeutic molecules, Nanoscale, 4, 7475 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. TA Owen, M Aronow, V Shalhoub, et al., Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix, J Cell Physiol, 143, 420 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. A Oldberg, A Franzen, D Heinegard, Cloning and sequence analysis of rat bone sialoprotein (osteopontin) cDNA reveals an Arg-Gly-Asp cell-binding sequence, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 83, 8819 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. JB Lian, GS Stein, Concepts of osteoblast growth and differentiation: Basis for modulation of bone cell development and tissue formation, Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 3, 269 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae-Won Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, GZ., Kim, HW. Nanocomposite bioactive polymeric scaffold promotes adhesion, proliferation and osteogenesis of rat bone marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med 11, 284–290 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-014-0033-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-014-0033-8

Key words

Navigation