Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of different extraction solvents and sonication times for characterization of antioxidant activity and polyphenol composition in mulberry (Morus alba L.)

  • Article
  • Published:
Applied Biological Chemistry Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various extraction solvents and sonication treatment times were compared to determine antioxidant activity and polyphenol composition in mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruits of the Gwasang No. 2 variety. Mulberry fruits were extracted with ethanol, methanol, acidic methanol (0.1% HCl), or acidic ethanol (0.1% HCl) with 0–60-min sonication to measure total phenolic content and antioxidant activity (DPPH radical scavenging activity). Moreover, a high-performance liquid chromatography method to analyze polyphenol compositions in mulberry extracts was developed and levels of common polyphenolic compounds in the different extracts were determined. The effects of different methanol ratios in acidic aqueous methanol (0–100%) on individual polyphenol contents in the extracts after 30 min of sonication were investigated. The total phenolic contents of the extracts using acidic methanol and sonicated for 60 min were significantly higher than phenolic contents upon extraction with other solvents and sonication times (p < 0.001). Interestingly, antioxidant activity of the extracts using acidic ethanol sonicated for 60 min was significantly higher than that of other extracts (p < 0.001). Cyanidin-3-glucoside and 3-rutinoside were the major polyphenol compounds in all mulberry extracts. Cyanidin-3-glucoside and 3-rutinoside concentrations were highest in the acidic methanol extract sonicated for 30 min (15,664 and 19,630 μg/g DW) (p < 0.001). The acidic methanol extract sonicated for 30 min contained significantly higher polyphenolic compound content than that of other extracts (p < 0.001). A decreased methanol ratio (0–80%) in acidic aqueous methanol resulted in chlorogenic acid overestimation in mulberry extracts. Thus, acidic 100% methanol with 30-min sonication is recommended for polyphenol analysis in mulberry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eom SH, Park HJ, Jin CW, Park SM, Kim MJ, Yu CY, Cho DH (2007) Changes of antioxidant activity in Juglans mandshurica Maxim. leaves by far infrared ray irradiation. Korean J Med Crop Sci 15(4):266–270

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hong H, Niu KM, Lee JH, Cho S, Han SG, Kim SK (2016) Characteristics of Chinese chives (Allium tuberosum) fermented by Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Appl Biol Chem 59(3):349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bermundez-Soto MJ, Larrosa M, Garcia-Cantalejo JM, Espín JC, Tomás-Barberan FA, García-Conesa MT (2007) Up-regulation of tumor suppressor carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 in human colon cancer Caco-2 cells following repetitive exposure to dietary levels of a polyphenol-rich chokeberry juice. J Nutr Biochem 18(4):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Larrosa M, González-Sarrías A, Yáñez-Gascón MJ, Selma MV, Azorín-Ortuño M, Toti S, Tomás-Barberán F, Dolara P, Espín JC (2010) Anti-inflammatory properties of a pomegranate extract and its metabolite urolithin-A in a colitis rat model and the effect of colon inflammation on phenolic metabolism. J Nutr Biochem 21(8):717–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bae SH, Suh HJ (2007) Antioxidant activities of five different mulberry cultivars in Korea. LWT Food Sci Technol 40(6):955–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dugo P, Mondello L, Errante G, Zappia G, Dugo G (2001) Identification of anthocyanins in berries by narrow-bore high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization detection. J Agric Food Chem 49(8):3987–3992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Narita Y, Inouye K (2013) Degradation kinetics of chlorogenic acid at various pH values and effects of ascorbic acid and epigallocatechin gallate on its stability under alkaline conditions. J Agric Food Chem 61(4):966–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ercisli S, Orhan E (2007) Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food Chem 103(4):1380–1384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aramwit P, Bang N, Srichana T (2010) The properties and stability of anthocyanins in mulberry fruits. Food Res Int 43(4):1093–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Du Q, Zheng J, Xu Y (2008) Composition of anthocyanins in mulberry and their antioxidant activity. J Food Compos Anal 21(5):390–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bao T, Xu Y, Gowd V, Zhao J, Xie J, Liang W, Chen W (2016) Systematic study on phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of some new and common mulberry cultivars in China. J Funct Foods 25:537–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Natic MM, Dabic DC, Papetti A, Fotiric Akšic MM, Ognjanov V, Ljubojevic M, Tešic ZL (2015) Analysis and characterisation of phytochemicals in mulberry (Morus alba L.) fruits grown in Vojvodina, North Serbia. Food Chem 171:128–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceymann M, Arrigoni E, Scharer H, Nising AB, Hurrell RF (2012) Identification of apples rich in health-promoting flavan-3-ols and phenolic acids by measuring the polyphenol profile. J Food Compos Anal 26(1–2):128–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vieira FGK, Borges GDSC, Copetti C, Pietro PFD, Nunes EDC, Fett R (2011) Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of the apple flesh and peel of eleven cultivars grown in Brazil. Sci Hortic 128(3):261–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wanyo P, Kaewseejan N, Meeso N, Siriamornpun S (2016) Bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties of different solvent extracts derived from Thai rice by-products. Appl Biol Chem 59(3):373–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ludwig IA, Mena P, Calani L, Borges G, Pereira-Caro G, Bresciani L, Rio DD, Lean MEJ, Crozier A (2015) New insights into the bioavailability of red raspberry anthocyanins and ellagitannins. Free Radic Biol Med 89:758–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Falleh H, Ksouri R, Lucchessi ME, Abdelly C, Magné C (2012) Ultrasound-assisted extraction: effect of extraction time and solvent power on the levels of polyphenols and antioxidant activity of Mesembryanthemum edule L. Aizoaceae shoots. Trop J Pharm Res 11(2):243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ardestani SB, Sahari MA, Barzegar M (2016) Effect of extraction and processing conditions on anthocyanins of barberry. J Food Process Preserv 40(6):1407–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aadil RM, Zeng XA, Han Z, Sun DW (2013) Effects of ultrasound treatments on quality of grapefruit juice. Food Chem 141(3):3201–3206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinela A, Rawat N, Mertz C, Achir N, Fulcrand H, Dornier M (2017) Anthocyanins degradation during storage of Hibiscus sabdariffa extract and evolution of its degradation products. Food Chem 214:234–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozela EF, Stringheta PC, Chauca MC (2007) Stability of anthocyanin in spinach vine (Basella rubra) fruits. Cienc Invest Agrar 34(2):115–120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. 2016R1C1B1014851). This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jihyun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, I., Lee, J. Comparison of different extraction solvents and sonication times for characterization of antioxidant activity and polyphenol composition in mulberry (Morus alba L.). Appl Biol Chem 60, 509–517 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-017-0303-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-017-0303-y

Keywords

Navigation