Abstract
The present study investigated the synergistic effect of co-digesting food and green waste from institute campus for enhanced biogas production in different ratios in batch tests (37 ± 1 °C, 90 rpm, 45 days). The results showed that blending improved the biogas production significantly, with highest biogas yield (660 ± 24 mL g−1 volatile solids) that was achieved at 75:25 of food and green waste ratio on volatile solids basis. The yield was 1.7- and 1.9-fold higher than the mono-digestion of food and green waste (370 ± 34; 342 ± 36 mL g−1 volatile solids), respectively. The increase in biogas production may be attributed to optimum carbon to nitrogen ratio resulting in higher yield. The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles showed virtually no effect on biogas production. Characterization was carried out to gain an insight of feedstocks. Modified Gompertz and logistics models were applied for kinetic study of biogas production where modified Gompertz model showed goodness of fit (R 2 = 0.9978) with the experimental results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelsalam E, Samer M, Attia YA, Abdel-Hadi MA, Hassan HE, Badr Y (2016) Comparison of nanoparticles effects on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of cattle dung slurry. Renew Energy 87:592–598
Agdag ON (2009) Comparison of old and new municipal solid waste management systems in Denizli, Turkey. Waste Manag 29:456–464
APHA (1989) Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington
Appels L, Lauwers J, Degreve J, Helsen L, Lievens B, Willems K, Impe JV, Dewil R (2011) Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production—potential and research challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:4295–4301
Browne JD, Murphy JD (2013) Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste. Appl Energy 104:170–177
Budiyono B, Syaichurrozi I, Sumardiono S (2014) Effect of total solid content to biogas production rate from vinasse. Int J Eng 27:177–184
Calderón FJ, McCarty GW, Reeves JB (2006) Pyrolisis-MS and FT-IR analysis of fresh and decomposed dairy manure. J Anal Appl Pyrol 76:14–23
Callaghan FJ, Wase DAJ, Thayanithy K, Forster CF (2002) Continuous codigestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenerg 22:71–77
Cheong DY, Hansen CL (2006) Bacterial stress enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production in cattle manure sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:635–643
Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanianb V, Jayaraj S (2014) biogas generation through anaerobic digestion process-an overview. Res J Chem Environ 18(5):80–93
Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanianb V, Jayaraja S (2015) Kinetic study on the effect of temperature on biogas production using a lab scale batch reactor. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 121:100–104
Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanianb V, Jayaraj S (2017) Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic digestion of food waste co-digested with poultry manure. Desalin Water Treat 59:72–76
Demirel B, Scherer P (2011) Trace element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane. Biomass Bioenerg 35:992–998
Fakharedine N, El Hajjouji H, Ait Baddi G, Revel JC, Hafidi M (2006) Chemical and spectroscopic analysis of organic matter transformation during aerobic digestion of olive-mill waste-waters. Process Biochem 41:398–404
FAO (2011) Towards the future, we want: End hunger and make the transition to sustainable agricultural and food systems. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome
FAO (2012) Towards the future, we want: End hunger and make the transition to sustainable agricultural and food systems. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome
Feng XM, Karlsson A, Svensson BH, Bertilsson S (2010) Impact of trace element addition on biogas production from food industrial waste-linking process to microflora. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:226–240
Gadhe A, Sonawane SS, Varma MN (2014) Ultrasonic pretreatment for an enhancement of biohydrogen production from complex food waste. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:7721–7729
Jackson-Moss CA, Duncan JR (1990) The effect of iron on anaerobic digestion. Biotech Lett 12:149–154
Kafle GK, Kim SH, Sung KI (2012) Batch anaerobic co-digestion of Kimchi factory waste silage and swine manure under mesophilic conditions. Biores Technol 124:489–494
Kafle GK, Sujala B, Kim SH, Chen L (2014) Anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste silage with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous study. Environ Technol 35:2708–2717
Katami T, Yasuhara A, Shibamoto T (2004) Formation of dioxins from incineration of foods found in domestic garbage. Environ Sci Technol 38:1062–1065
Koch K, Drewes JE (2014) Alternative approach to estimate the hydrolysis rate constant of particulate material from batch data. Appl Energy 120:11–15
Koch K, Plabst M, Schmidt A, Helmreich B, Drewes JE (2016) Co-digestion of food waste in a municipal wastewater treatment plant: comparison of batch tests and full-scale experiences. Waste Manag 47:28–33
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275
Manios VI, Siminis HI (1988) Town refuse compost of Heraklio. Biocycle 29:44–47
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitro salicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–432
Momoh OLY, Nwaogazie IL (2011) The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth. Biomass Bioenerg 35:1345–1351
Nopharatana A, Pullammanappallil PC, Clarke WP (2006) Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. Waste Manag 27:595–603
Paritosh K, Kushwaha S, Yadav M, Pareek N, Chawade A, Vivekanand V (2017) Food waste to energy: an overview on sustainable approach for food waste management and nutrient recycling, BioMed Res Intl 2017:1–19
Pham TPT, Kaushik R, Parshetti GK, Mahmood R, Balasubramanian R (2015) Food-waste-to-energy conversion technologies: current status and future directions. Waste Manag 38:399–408
Pick D, Dieterich M, Heintschel S (2012) Biogas production potential from economically usable green waste. Int J Sustain Dev 4:682–702
Provenzano MR, Malerba AD, Pezzolla D, Gigliotti G (2014) Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of organic matter during the anaerobic digestion and successive composting of pig slurry. Waste Manag 34:653–660
Rodríguez Á, Gómez X, Blanco D, Cuetos MJ, Fernández B, Flotats X (2013) Study of thermal pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste by TGA-MS and FTIR spectroscopy. Waste Manag Res 3:1195–1202
Smidt E, Lechner P, Schwanninger M, Haberhauer G, Gerzabek MH (2002) Characterization of the waste organic matter by FT-IR spectroscopy: application in waste science. Appl Spectrosc 56:1170–1175
Thauer RK, Kaster AK, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R (2001) Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:579–591
Vandermeersch T, Alvarenga RAF, Ragaert P, Dewulf J (2014) Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options. Resour Conserv Recycl 87:57–64
Vivekanand V, Olsen EF, Eijsink VGH, Horn JS (2013) Effect of different steam explosion conditions on methane potential and enzymatic saccharification of birch. Biores Technol 127:343–349
Wang Q, Jiang JG, Zhang YJ, Li KM (2015) Effect of initial total solids concentration on volatile fatty acid production from food waste during anaerobic acidification. Environ Technol 36:1884–1891
Yadvika S, Sreekrishnan TR, Kohli S, Rana V (2001) Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques: a review. Biores Technol 95:1–10
Zamanzadeh M, Hagen LH, Svensson K, Linjordet R, Horn SJ (2016) Anaerobic digestion of food waste: effect of recirculation and temperature on performance and microbiology. Water Res 96:246–254
Zirkler D, Peters A, Kaupenjohann M (2014) Elemental composition of biogas residues: variability and alteration during anaerobic digestio. Biomass Bioenerg 67:89–98
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Department of Biotechnology (Government of India) to support this work financially (No. BT/RLF/Re-entry/04/2013). We also thank Material Research Centre at MNIT Jaipur, SIC-IIT Indore and Mr. Ishwar at Rajasthan Gosewa Sangh, Durgapura, Jaipur, for their help in the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Binbin Huang.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paritosh, K., Mathur, S., Pareek, N. et al. Feasibility study of waste (d) potential: co-digestion of organic wastes, synergistic effect and kinetics of biogas production. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 1009–1018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1453-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1453-5