Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility study of waste (d) potential: co-digestion of organic wastes, synergistic effect and kinetics of biogas production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the synergistic effect of co-digesting food and green waste from institute campus for enhanced biogas production in different ratios in batch tests (37 ± 1 °C, 90 rpm, 45 days). The results showed that blending improved the biogas production significantly, with highest biogas yield (660 ± 24 mL g−1 volatile solids) that was achieved at 75:25 of food and green waste ratio on volatile solids basis. The yield was 1.7- and 1.9-fold higher than the mono-digestion of food and green waste (370 ± 34; 342 ± 36 mL g−1 volatile solids), respectively. The increase in biogas production may be attributed to optimum carbon to nitrogen ratio resulting in higher yield. The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles showed virtually no effect on biogas production. Characterization was carried out to gain an insight of feedstocks. Modified Gompertz and logistics models were applied for kinetic study of biogas production where modified Gompertz model showed goodness of fit (R 2 = 0.9978) with the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelsalam E, Samer M, Attia YA, Abdel-Hadi MA, Hassan HE, Badr Y (2016) Comparison of nanoparticles effects on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of cattle dung slurry. Renew Energy 87:592–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agdag ON (2009) Comparison of old and new municipal solid waste management systems in Denizli, Turkey. Waste Manag 29:456–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1989) Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Appels L, Lauwers J, Degreve J, Helsen L, Lievens B, Willems K, Impe JV, Dewil R (2011) Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production—potential and research challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:4295–4301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browne JD, Murphy JD (2013) Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste. Appl Energy 104:170–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Budiyono B, Syaichurrozi I, Sumardiono S (2014) Effect of total solid content to biogas production rate from vinasse. Int J Eng 27:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderón FJ, McCarty GW, Reeves JB (2006) Pyrolisis-MS and FT-IR analysis of fresh and decomposed dairy manure. J Anal Appl Pyrol 76:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan FJ, Wase DAJ, Thayanithy K, Forster CF (2002) Continuous codigestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenerg 22:71–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong DY, Hansen CL (2006) Bacterial stress enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production in cattle manure sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:635–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanianb V, Jayaraj S (2014) biogas generation through anaerobic digestion process-an overview. Res J Chem Environ 18(5):80–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanianb V, Jayaraja S (2015) Kinetic study on the effect of temperature on biogas production using a lab scale batch reactor. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 121:100–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanianb V, Jayaraj S (2017) Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic digestion of food waste co-digested with poultry manure. Desalin Water Treat 59:72–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel B, Scherer P (2011) Trace element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane. Biomass Bioenerg 35:992–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fakharedine N, El Hajjouji H, Ait Baddi G, Revel JC, Hafidi M (2006) Chemical and spectroscopic analysis of organic matter transformation during aerobic digestion of olive-mill waste-waters. Process Biochem 41:398–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011) Towards the future, we want: End hunger and make the transition to sustainable agricultural and food systems. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • FAO (2012) Towards the future, we want: End hunger and make the transition to sustainable agricultural and food systems. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Feng XM, Karlsson A, Svensson BH, Bertilsson S (2010) Impact of trace element addition on biogas production from food industrial waste-linking process to microflora. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:226–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gadhe A, Sonawane SS, Varma MN (2014) Ultrasonic pretreatment for an enhancement of biohydrogen production from complex food waste. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:7721–7729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson-Moss CA, Duncan JR (1990) The effect of iron on anaerobic digestion. Biotech Lett 12:149–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kafle GK, Kim SH, Sung KI (2012) Batch anaerobic co-digestion of Kimchi factory waste silage and swine manure under mesophilic conditions. Biores Technol 124:489–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kafle GK, Sujala B, Kim SH, Chen L (2014) Anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste silage with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous study. Environ Technol 35:2708–2717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katami T, Yasuhara A, Shibamoto T (2004) Formation of dioxins from incineration of foods found in domestic garbage. Environ Sci Technol 38:1062–1065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K, Drewes JE (2014) Alternative approach to estimate the hydrolysis rate constant of particulate material from batch data. Appl Energy 120:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K, Plabst M, Schmidt A, Helmreich B, Drewes JE (2016) Co-digestion of food waste in a municipal wastewater treatment plant: comparison of batch tests and full-scale experiences. Waste Manag 47:28–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manios VI, Siminis HI (1988) Town refuse compost of Heraklio. Biocycle 29:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitro salicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Momoh OLY, Nwaogazie IL (2011) The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth. Biomass Bioenerg 35:1345–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nopharatana A, Pullammanappallil PC, Clarke WP (2006) Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. Waste Manag 27:595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paritosh K, Kushwaha S, Yadav M, Pareek N, Chawade A, Vivekanand V (2017) Food waste to energy: an overview on sustainable approach for food waste management and nutrient recycling, BioMed Res Intl 2017:1–19

  • Pham TPT, Kaushik R, Parshetti GK, Mahmood R, Balasubramanian R (2015) Food-waste-to-energy conversion technologies: current status and future directions. Waste Manag 38:399–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pick D, Dieterich M, Heintschel S (2012) Biogas production potential from economically usable green waste. Int J Sustain Dev 4:682–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Provenzano MR, Malerba AD, Pezzolla D, Gigliotti G (2014) Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of organic matter during the anaerobic digestion and successive composting of pig slurry. Waste Manag 34:653–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Á, Gómez X, Blanco D, Cuetos MJ, Fernández B, Flotats X (2013) Study of thermal pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste by TGA-MS and FTIR spectroscopy. Waste Manag Res 3:1195–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smidt E, Lechner P, Schwanninger M, Haberhauer G, Gerzabek MH (2002) Characterization of the waste organic matter by FT-IR spectroscopy: application in waste science. Appl Spectrosc 56:1170–1175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thauer RK, Kaster AK, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R (2001) Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:579–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeersch T, Alvarenga RAF, Ragaert P, Dewulf J (2014) Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options. Resour Conserv Recycl 87:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivekanand V, Olsen EF, Eijsink VGH, Horn JS (2013) Effect of different steam explosion conditions on methane potential and enzymatic saccharification of birch. Biores Technol 127:343–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Jiang JG, Zhang YJ, Li KM (2015) Effect of initial total solids concentration on volatile fatty acid production from food waste during anaerobic acidification. Environ Technol 36:1884–1891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadvika S, Sreekrishnan TR, Kohli S, Rana V (2001) Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques: a review. Biores Technol 95:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamanzadeh M, Hagen LH, Svensson K, Linjordet R, Horn SJ (2016) Anaerobic digestion of food waste: effect of recirculation and temperature on performance and microbiology. Water Res 96:246–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zirkler D, Peters A, Kaupenjohann M (2014) Elemental composition of biogas residues: variability and alteration during anaerobic digestio. Biomass Bioenerg 67:89–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Department of Biotechnology (Government of India) to support this work financially (No. BT/RLF/Re-entry/04/2013). We also thank Material Research Centre at MNIT Jaipur, SIC-IIT Indore and Mr. Ishwar at Rajasthan Gosewa Sangh, Durgapura, Jaipur, for their help in the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Vivekanand.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Binbin Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paritosh, K., Mathur, S., Pareek, N. et al. Feasibility study of waste (d) potential: co-digestion of organic wastes, synergistic effect and kinetics of biogas production. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 1009–1018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1453-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1453-5

Keywords

Navigation