Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Food Policy Approaches to Obesity Prevention: An International Perspective

  • Obesity Prevention (A Must, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Obesity Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the recent obesity prevention–related food policies initiated in countries worldwide. We searched and reviewed relevant research papers and government documents, focusing on those related to dietary guidelines, food labeling, regulation of food marketing, and policies affecting food prices. We also commented on the effects and challenges of some of the related policy options. There are large variations regarding what, when, and how policies have been implemented across countries. Clearly, developed countries are leading the effort, and developing countries are starting to develop some related policies. The encouraging message is that many countries have been adopting policies that might help prevent obesity and that the support for more related initiatives is strong and continues to grow. Communicating information about these practices will help researchers, public health professionals, and policy makers around the world to take action to fight the growing epidemic of obesity and other nutrition-related diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html. Accessed November 26, 2013.

  2. Wang Y, Yang W, Wilson RF, et al. Childhood Obesity Prevention Programs: Comparative Effectiveness Review and Meta-Analysis. Comparative Effective Review No. 115. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2013. This study (an 835-page full report is available online at AHRQ’s Web site) provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of 124 childhood obesity prevention studies published in high-income countries, as well as recommendations for future research directions.

  3. World Health Organization. Controlling the global obesity epidemic. Available at http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/obesity/en/. Accessed December 26, 2013. The WHO provides recommendations, including policy options for obesity prevention and control.

  4. Farley TA, Van Wye G. Reversing the obesity epidemic: the importance of policy and policy research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3S2):S93–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dodson EA, Eyler AA, Chalifour S, Wintrode CG. A review of obesity-themed policy briefs. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3S2):S143–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council of the National Academies. Local government actions to prevent childhood obesity. Edited by Parker L, Burns AC, Sanchez E. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

  7. Ministry of Health. Food and Nutrition Guidelines for Healthy Children and Young People (aged 2-18): A background paper. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. US Department of Agriculture. Smart snacks in school. Available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/legislation/allfoods.htm. Accessed December 29, 2013.

  9. Mair JS, Pierce MW, Teret SP. The use of zoning to restrict fast food outlets: a potential strategy to combat obesity. Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Johns Hopkins and Georgetown Universities; 2005.

  10. US Food and Drug Administration. Menu and vending machines labeling requirements. 2010. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/ucm217762.htm. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  11. Harris JL, Graff SK. Protecting young people from junk food advertising: implications of psychological research for First Amendment law. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(2):214–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Popkin B, Monteiro C, Swinburn B. Bellagio conference on program and policy: options for preventing obesity in the low- and middle-income countries. Obes Rev. 2013;14(2):1–8. This paper discusses food policies adopted by selected countries to prevent obesity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkes C, Jewell J, Allen K. A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework. Obes Rev. 2013;14(2):159–68. This paper discusses the NOURISHING framework and the food policies adopted by selected countries to prevent obesity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkes C. Promoting healthy diets through nutrition education and change in the food environment: an international review of actions and their effectiveness. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ellison B, Lusk JL, Davis D. Looking at the label and beyond: the effects of calorie labels, health consciousness, and demographics on caloric intake in restaurants. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10. This study suggests that different types of calorie labels in restaurants might have different effects on a consumer’s calorie intake, depending on his or her health consciousness.

  16. Kim S, Douthitt RA. The role of dietary information in women’s whole milk and low-fat milk intakes. Int J Consum Stud. 2004;28(3):245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harnack LJ, French SA. Effect of point-of-purchase calorie labeling on restaurant and cafeteria food choices: a review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(51):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mhurchu CN, Gorton D. Nutrition labels and claims in New Zealand and Australia: a review of use and understanding. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(2):105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swartz JJ, Braxton D, Viera AJ. Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:135.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nordic Council of Ministers. About the keyhole. Available at http://www.norden.org/en/nordic-council-of-ministers/council-of-ministers/council-of-miministe-for-fisheries-and-aquaculture-agriculture-food-and-forestry-mr-fjls/keyhole-nutritinu-label. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  21. Feunekes G, Gortemaker I, Willems A, Lion R, den Kommer M. Front-of-pack nutrition labeling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labeling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite. 2008;50(1):57–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Food Standards Agency. Front-of-pack nutrition labeling. Available at http://food.gov.uk/scotland/scotnut/signposting/#.UpejmuLK-ne. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  23. International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA). Front-of-pack labeling around the world. Available at http://www.idfa.org/blogs/nutrition/2013/08/front-of-pack-labeling-around-the-world/. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  24. Australia Food News. Australian ministers approve front-of-pack labeling system but dairy products approach still to be finalized, June 17 2013. Available at http://www.ausfoodnews.com.au/2013/06/17/australian-ministers-approve-front-of-pack-labelling-system-but-dairy-products-approach-still-to-be-finalised.html. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  25. Sirikeratikul S. Thai FDA’s new guideline daily amounts (GDA) labeling. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) Report. No. TH1077. Available at http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Thai%20FDA%E2%80%99s%20New%20Guideline%20Daily%20Amounts%20%28GDA%29%20Labeling%20_Bangkok_Thailand_6-13-2011.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  26. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: letter regarding point of purchase food labeling. 2009. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm187208.htm. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  27. Food and Drug Administration. Letter of enforcement discretion to GMA/FMI re “Facts Up Front.” 2011. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeli%5B%5Dng/LabelingNutrition/ucm302720.htm. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  28. China Product Identification, Authentication and Tracking Systems (CPIAT). Food labeling regulation. Available at http://www.95001111.com/websiteserv/web/goverment/policy_content.jsp?id=578. Accessed December 8, 2013.

  29. Tao Y, Li J, Lo YM, Tang Q, Wang Y. Food nutrition labeling practice in China. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(3):542–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin B, Guthrie J. Nutritional quality of food prepared at home and away from home, 1977-2008. Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-105). 2012. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib105.aspx#.UoKPED_VYSQ. Accessed January 4, 2014.

  31. Burton S, Creyer EH, Kees J, Huggins K. Attacking the obesity epidemic: the potential health benefits of providing nutrition information in restaurants. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(9):1669–75.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Food and Drug Administration. Overview of FDA proposed labeling requirements for restaurants, similar retail food establishments and vending machines. 2013. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/ucm248732.htm. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  33. Elbel B, Gyamfi J, Kersh R. Child and adolescent fast-food choice and the influence of calorie labeling: a natural experiment. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(4):493–500. This natural experiment found that mandatory calorie labeling did not influence fast food choices of children and adolescents in low-income communities.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Elbel B. Mandatory calorie postings at fast-food chains often ignored or unseen, does not influence food choice.2013. Available at http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-11/nlmc-mcp111213.php. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  35. Utter J, Scragg R, Schaaf D. Associations between television viewing and consumption of commonly advertised foods among New Zealand children and young adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(5):606–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Federal Trade Commission. A review of food marketing to children and adolescents: follow up report. 2012. Available at http://ftc.gov/os/2012/12/121221foodmarketingreport.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  37. Harrison K, Marske AL. Nutritional content of foods advertised during the television programs children watch most. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(9):1568–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chapman K, Nicholas P, Supramaniam R. How much food advertising is there on Australian television? Health Promot Int. 2006;21(3):172–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Scully M, Dixon H, Wakefield M. Association between commercial television exposure and fast-food consumption among adults. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(1):105–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Oommen VG, Anderson PJ. Policies on restriction of food advertising during children’s television viewing times: an international perspective. In: Proceedings Australian College of Health Service Executives 2008 Conference, Going for Gold in Health—Motivation, Effort, Performance. Gold Coast, Australia; 2008.

  41. European Public Health Alliance. Junk food: evolution of the legislation in European countries.2007. Available at http://www.epha.org/spip.php?article2554. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  42. EU Pledge. About the EU pledge. 2013. Available at http://www.eu-pledge.eu/content/about-eu-pledge. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  43. EU Pledge. Nutrition criteria: White paper. 2012. Available at http://www.eu-pledge.eu/sites/eu-pledge.eu/files/releases/EU_Pledge_Nutrition_White_Paper_Nov_2012.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  44. Broadcast Authority of Ireland. BAI signals new rules to govern advertising of food and drink in children’s advertising. 2013. Available at http://www.bai.ie/?p=2792. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  45. Strait Times. Ban on ads that drive kids to unhealthy food. October 28, 2012. Available at http://www.facebook.com/notes/reachsingapore/ban-on-ads-that-drive-kids-to-unhealthy-food/10151132709078795. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  46. Walt Disney. The Walt Disney Company sets new standards for food advertising to kids. June 4, 2012. Available at http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/disney-news/press-releases/2012/06/walt-disney-company-sets-new-standards-food-advertising-kids. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  47. World Health Organization (WHO). 2008-2013 action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Friedman RR, Brownell KD. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: an updated policy brief. Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity: New Haven, CT; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  49. National Heart Forum. What is the role of health-related food duties? 2012. Available at http://www.iaso.org/site_media/uploads/UKHF_duties.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  50. Holt E. Romania mulls over fast food tax. Lancet. 2010;375:1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mytton OT, Clarke D, Rayner M. Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health. BMJ. 2012;344:e2931. This paper systematically reviews existing evidence on the effectiveness of health-related food taxes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Villanueva T. European nations launch tax attack on unhealthy foods. CMAJ. 2011;183(17):E1229–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Center for Science in the Public Interest. Existing soft drink taxes. 2011. Available at http://cspinet.org/liquidcandy/existingtaxes.html. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  54. Lin H, Smith TA, Lee JY, Hall KD. Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Econ Hum Biol. 2011;9(4):329–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet. 2011;378:826–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Brownell KD, Frieden TR. Ounces of prevention—the public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(18):1805–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Brownell KD, Farley T, Willett WC, et al. The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1599–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rolls BJ, Ello-Martin JA, Tohill BC. What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management? Nutr Rev. 2004;62(1):1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fisher JO, Liu Y, Birch LL, Rolls BJ. Effects of portion size and energy density on young children’s intake at a meal. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(1):174–9.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Let’s Move. September is fruits & veggies—more matters month. Available at http://www.letsmove.gov/blog/2013/09/16/september-fruits-veggies-%E2%80%94-more-matters-month. Accessed December 29, 2013.

  61. Juster FT, Ono H, Stafford FP. Changing time of American youth: 1981-2003. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 2004. Available at http://www.ns.umich.edu/Releases/2004/Nov04/teen_time_report.pdf . Accessed September 22, 2013.

  62. Chriqui JF, Schneider L, Ide K, Pugach O, Chaloupka FJ. Local wellness policies: Assessing school district strategies for improving children’s health — school years 2006-07 and 2007-08. Bridging the Gap Program, Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2009.

  63. Briefel RR, Crepinsek MK, Cabili C, Wilson A, Gleason PM. School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors of US public school children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109 Suppl 2:S91–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fox MK, Dodd AH, Wilson A, Gleason PM. Association between school food environment and practices and body mass index of US public school children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109 Suppl 2:S108–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fox MK, Gordon A, Nogales R, Wilson A. Availability and consumption of competitive foods in US public schools. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109 Suppl 2:S57–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. US Department of Agriculture. Healthy, Hunger-free Kids Act of 2010. Available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/legislation/PL111-296_Summary.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2013.

  67. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Competitive foods and beverages in U.S. schools: A state policy analysis. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012. This study pointed out that although many states had set standards for competitive foods sold in schools, few of them had met half of the IOM standard of competitive foods.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bertin M, Lafay L, Calamassi-Tran G, Volatier JL, Dubuisson C. School meals in French secondary state schools: do national recommendations lead to healthier nutrition on offer? Br J Nutr. 2012;107(3):416–27. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of school dietary guidelines in offering nutrition-balanced school meals. It also points out that school dietary guidelines themselves cannot lead to healthier school meals.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Swinburn B, Wood A. Progress on obesity prevention over 20 years in Australia and New Zealand. Obesity Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Khan SH, Talukder SH. Nutrition transition in Bangladesh: is the country ready for this double burden? Obesity Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:126–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Jaime PC, da Silva ACF, Gentil PC, Claro RM, Monteiro CA. Brazilian obesity prevention and control initiatives. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hawkes C. Regulating food marketing to young people worldwide: trends and policy drivers. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(11):1962–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Health Canada. Amendments to the Food and Drugs Act (Bill C-38). 2012. Available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/legislation/acts-lois/c-38-eng.php. Accessed January 2, 2014.

  74. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Guide to food labeling and advertising. 2013. Available at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/food/labelling/guide-to-food-labelling-and-advertising/eng/1300118951990/1300118996556. Accessed January 2, 2014.

  75. Corvalán C, Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Uauy R. Structural responses to the obesity and non-communicable diseases epidemic: the Chilean law of food labeling and advertising. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:79–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wang H, Zhai F. Programme and policy options for preventing obesity in China. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Madden D. The poverty effects of a ‘fat-tax’ in Ireland. Health Econ. 2013. doi:10.1002/hec.3006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Khandelwal S, Reddy KS. Eliciting a policy response for the rising epidemic of overweight-obesity in India. Obesity Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:114–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Barquera S, Campos I, Rivera JA. Mexico attempts to tackle obesity: the process, results, push backs and future challenges. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:69–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hawkes C, Lobstein T. Regulating the commercial promotion of food to children: a survey of actions worldwide. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(2):83–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. van Ansem WJ, Schrijvers CT, Rodenburg G, Schuit AJ, van de Mheen D. School food policy at Dutch primary schools: room for improvement? Cross-sectional findings from the INPACT study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:339.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Snowdon W, Thow AM. Trade policy and obesity prevention: challenges and innovation in the Pacific Islands. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:150–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Foo LL, Vijaya K, Sloan RA, Ling A. Obesity prevention and management: Singapore’s experience. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:106–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Lambert EV, Kolbe-Alexander TL. Innovative strategies targeting obesity and non-communicable diseases in South Africa: what can we learn from the private healthcare sector? Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:141–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kwak NS, Kim E, Kim HR. Current status and improvements of obesity related legislation. Koren J Nutr. 2010;43(4):413–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Food labeling standards. 2011. Available at http://www.mfds.go.kr/eng/index.do?nMenuCode=27. Accessed January 2, 2014.

  87. International Confederation of Dietetic Associations. Clinical dietary certificate as national qualification in Korea. 2010. Available at http://www.internationaldietetics.org/Newsletter/Vol20Issue2/NDA-Report---Korea.aspx . Accessed January 2, 2014.

  88. Chavasit V, Kasemsup V, Tontisirin K. Thailand conquered under-nutrition very successfully but has not slowed obesity. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:96–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Jebb SA, Aveyard PN, Hawkes C. The evolution of policy and actions to tackle obesity in England. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:42–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Rudd Center. Industry Self-Regulation. 2013. Available at http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/what_we_do.aspx?id=25. Accessed January 2, 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported in part by research grants from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [research grants 1R01HD064685-01A1 and U54HD070725 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)]. The U54 project is cofunded by the NICHD and the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research of the NIH. Dr. Shiyong Liu’s effort was supported in part by a research grant from the Chinese National Social Science Foundation (12CGL103). The content of the paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders. We also thank Dr. HyunJung Lim for her assistance in collecting some related information.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

ᅟ

Conflict of Interest

Qi Zhang has received a consulting fee or honorarium from Johns Hopkins University.

Shiyong Liu, Ruicui Liu, Hong Xue, and Youfa Wang declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA

    Qi Zhang & Ruicui Liu

  2. Department of Epidemology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8001, USA

    Shiyong Liu, Hong Xue & Youfa Wang

  3. Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, #55 Guanghuacun Street, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610074

    Shiyong Liu

Authors
  1. Qi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiyong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruicui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hong Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Youfa Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youfa Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Liu, S., Liu, R. et al. Food Policy Approaches to Obesity Prevention: An International Perspective. Curr Obes Rep 3, 171–182 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-014-0099-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-014-0099-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation