Abstract
Slug (Lehmannia valentiana) is known as a particularly troublesome pest in greenhouse, and commonly controlled by chemical bait molluscicides containing either metaldehyde or carbamate. These chemicals often caused undesirable side effects such as significant toxicity in non-target organisms or contamination in food and environment. We conducted several laboratory trials with natural products such as caffeine and tobacco extract or their mixtures combined with ethyl alcohol to assess their molluscicidal efficiency on slug. Slug mortality was evaluated after the three chemicals were sprayed in various concentrations on the slugs in pots. Ethyl alcohol of 10% provided above 90% mortality rate, whereas 3–7% resulted in below 30% mortality rate. Ethyl alcohol (5–7%) mixed with 0.5% caffeine or tobacco extract increased the slug mortality from 50% to 80%. In no-choice feeding test to investigate the behavioral response of the slug to the food, Chinese cabbage leaves were dipped in a mixture of caffeine (0.5%) and alcohol (5 or 7%). The caffeine mixture appeared to act as a repellent compared with the untreated, but tobacco extract/alcohol mixture (0.5/7%) provided a pattern attracting slugs. When two mixtures of caffeine/ethyl alcohol (0.5/5%) and tobacco extract/ethyl alcohol (0.5/7%) were sprayed on marigold seedlings, slug damage decreased by more than 65% compared with the control. Phytotoxic effect such as leaf burn on marigold seedlings was shown by caffeine/alcohol mixture but not by tobacco extract/alcohol mixture. In conclusion, the mixture of 0.5% tobacco extract and 7% ethyl alcohol could be a proper control method for slug in green house without causing any negative impact to environment or plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Acamovic, T., C.S. Stewart, and T.W. Pennycott. 2004. Poisonous plants and related toxins. CABI Publishing, Wallingford p. 142–143.
Fletcher, M.R., K. Hunter, and E.A. Barnet. 1994. Pesticide poisoning of animals 1993. MAFF Publications, London p. 52.
Fletcher, M.R., K. Hunter, M.P. Quick, H.M. Thompson, and P.W. Greig-Smith. 1991. Pesticide poisoning of animals 1990. MAFF Publications, London p. 30.
Frischknecht, P.M., J. Ulmer-Dufek, and T.W. Baumann. 1986. Purine alkaloid formation in buds and developing leaflets of Coffea arabica: Expression of an optimal defence strategy. Phytochemistry 25:613–616.
Garthwaite, D.G. and M.R. Thomas. 1996. The usage of molluscicides in agriculture and horticulture in Great Britain over the last 30 years. BCPC Symp. Proc. 66:39–46.
Glen, D.M. and M.J. Wilson. 1997. Slug-parasitic nematodes as biocontrol agents for slugs. Agro. Food Ind. Hi-Tech. 8:23–27.
Hata, T.Y., H.H. Arnold, and B.K.S. Hu. 1997. Molluscicides and mechanical barriers against slugs, Vaginula plebeian Fischer and Veronicella cubensis (Pfeiffer) (Stylommatophora: Veronicellidae). Crop Protect. 16:501–506.
Hollingsworth, R.G., J.W. Armstrong, and E. Campbell. 2002. Caffeine as a repellent for slugs and snails. Nature 417:915–916.
Lee, S.G., J.D. Park, S.E. Lee, C. Song, K.Y. Cho, S.G. Lee, M.K. Kim, and H.S. Lee. 2001a. Insecticidal activity of various vegetable extracts against five agricultural insect pests and four stored-product insect pests. Kor. J. Pestic. Sci. 5:18–25.
Lee, S.G., B.S. Park, S.E. Lee, J.G. Son, C. Song, and H.S. Lee. 2001b. Toxicity of various fruit tree extracts to five agricultural and four stored-product anthropod pests. Kor. J. Pestic. Sci. 5:27–32.
Martin, T.J. 1993. The ecobiological effects of arable cropping including the non-target effects of pesticides with special reference to methiocarb pellets (Draza, Mesurol) used for slug control. Pflanzenshutz-Nachr. Bayer. 46:49–102.
Nathanson, J.A. 1984. Caffeine and related methylxanthines: Possible naturally occurring pesticides. Science 226:184–187.
National Organic Program (NOP). 2000. USDA national organic program regulations, 205.601(h) (http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/).
Park, I.K., J.D. Park, C.S. Kim, S.C. Shin, Y.J. Ahn, S.C. Park, and S.G. Lee. 2002. Insecticidal and acaricidal activity of domestic plant extract against five major arthropod pests. Kor. J. Pestic. Sci. 6:271–278.
Pottorff, L.P. 2010. Some Pesticides permitted in organic gardening. Colorado State University cooperative extension (http://www.colostate.edu/Dept/CoopExt/4DMG/VegFruit/organic.htm).
Rae, R.G., J.F. Robertson, and M.J. Wilson. 2009. Optimization of biological (Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita) and chemical (iron phosphate and metaldehyde) slug control. Crop Prot. 28:765–773.
Sahley, C.L., K.A. Martin, and A. Gelperin. 1992. Odors can induce feeding motor responses in the terrestrial mollusc. Behav Neurosci. 106:563–568.
Sanco, D.G. 2008. EU pesticide database. Reg. (EC) No. 396/2005 (http://ec.europa.eu/sanco_pesticides/public/index.cfm).
Soloway, S.B. 1976. Naturally occurring insecticides. Environmental Health Perspectives 14:109–117.
Speiser, B. and M. Hochstrasser. 1998. Slug damage in relation to watering regime. Agric. Ecosystem Environ. 70:273–275.
Speiser, B. and C. Kistler. 2002. Field tests with a molluscicide containing iron phosphate. Crop Prot. 21:389–394.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 2003. U.S. office of the federal register. p. 462.
Wilson, M.J., D.M. Glen, and S.K. George. 1993. The rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita as a potential biological control agent for slugs. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 3:503–511.
Ujváry, I. 1999. Nicotine and other insecticidal alkaloids, p. 29–69. In: Yamamoto, I. and J.E. Casida (eds.). Nicotinoid insecticides and the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoon, J.C., J.H. Park, C.K. Shim, K.Y. Ryu, and H.J. Jee. 2007. Control of slug by using beer and cigarette mixture. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 46:325–330.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, K.J., Lee, S.W., Hong, J.K. et al. Effective control of slug damage through tobacco extract and caffeine solution in combination with alcohol. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 53, 123–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-012-0100-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-012-0100-9