Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Micromonospora sp. KSC08 on nitrogen conservation throughout composting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Composting includes a series of reactions resulting in alterations on organic content and nitrogen amount. NH3 volatilization via ammonification and N2 and N2O losses through nitrification are the major sources of nitrogen loss during composting. Amendment with microorganism inoculation was among recently adopted approaches to compensate for nitrogen losses and improve compost quality. Compost amendment via Micromonospora sp. KSC08, an asymbiotic free-living-(N2)-fixing microorganism, was conducted in the present study in order to investigate microorganism’s potential for nitrogen regulation. Twenty windrow systems with varying olive pomace%, microorganism amount, and addition time were prepared for statistical determination of the changes in total C, total nitrogen, and nitrate-nitrogen amounts. Analyses were evaluated in accordance with pH, humidity, and temperature measurements obtained during composting. Final part of the study included maturity evaluation and PCA modeling of FT-IR data. Micromonospora sp. KSC08 was shown to improve microbial activity and regulate nitrogen content by providing exogenous nitrogen to compost mixture. PCA models revealed entirely different structures between untreated and Micromonospora sp. KSC08-treated compost samples at the end of 120 days. The variant molecular structure of samples inoculated with Micromonospora sp. KSC08 was attributed to reactions between carboxyclic acid units and nitrogenous compounds leading to a significant increase in amide content compared to untreated mixtures. Higher amide content was due to higher nitrogen content of Micromonospora sp. KSC08-treated compost, and based on the findings, it was concluded that Micromonospora sp. KSC08 had been effective in nitrogen regulation and proposed as a possible component of microbial consortium for use in conventional composting systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Statistical analyses were conducted via Minitab software. OPUS 5.5 (Bruker, USA) software was utilized in the analysis of spectral data. Principal component analysis (PCA) was done by Camo Software, NO.

References

  1. Kucbel M, Raclavska H, Ruzickova J, Svedova B, Sassmanova V, Drozdova J, Raclavsky K, Juchelkova D (2019) Properties of composts from household waste produced in automatic composters. J Enviromon Manage 236:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lleó T, Albacete E, Barrena R, Font X, Artola A, Sánchez A (2013) Home and vermicomposting as sustainable options for biowaste management. J Clean Produc 47:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vázquez MA, Soto M (2017) The efficiency of home composting programmes and compost quality. Waste Manag 64:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Y, Li W, Liu B, Wang K, Su C, Wu C (2013) Ammonia emissions and biodegradation of organic carbon during sewage sludge composting with different extra carbon sources. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 85:624–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang F, Li GX, Yang QY, Luo WH (2013) Effect of bulking agents on maturity and gaseous emissions during kitchen waste composting. Chemosphere 93(7):1393–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan J, Chadwick D, Zhang D, Li G, Luo W, Du L, He S (2016) Effects of aeration rate on maturity and gaseous emissions during sewage sludge composting. Waste Manag 56:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manu MK, Kumar R, Garg A (2017) Performance assessment of improved composting system for food waste with varying aeration and use of microbial inoculum. Bioresour Tecnol 234:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng Y, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Lu Q, Li M, Wang X, Wei Y, Xie X, Wei Z (2016) A regulating method for reducing nitrogen loss based on enriched ammonia-oxidizing bacteria during composting. Bioresour Technol 221:276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Agyarko-Mintah E, Cowie A, Zwieten LV, Sing BP, Smillie R, Harden S, Fornasier F (2017) Biochar lowers ammonia emission and improves nitrogen retention in poultry litter composting. Waste Manage 61:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meng L, Li W, Zhang S, Wua C, Jiang W, Sha C (2016) Effect of different extra carbon sources on nitrogen loss control and the change of bacterial populations in sewage sludge composting. Ecol Eng 94:238–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan JT, Cai HZ, Zhang ZQ, Liu HB, Li RH, Mao H, Awasthi MK, Wang Q, Zhai LM (2018) Comparative evaluation of the use of acidic additives on sewage sludge composting quality improvement, nitrogen conservation, and greenhouse gas reduction. Bioresour Technol 270:467–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Awasthi MK, Wang M, Chen H, Wang Q, Zhao J, Ren X (2017) Heterogeneity of biochar amendment to improve the carbon and nitrogen sequestration through reduce the greenhouse gases emissions during sewage sludge composting. Bioresour Technol 224:428–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ren X, Wang Q, Awasthi MK, Zhao J, Wang J, Liu T, Li R, Zhang Z (2019) Improvement of cleaner composting production by adding Diatomite: from the nitrogen conservation and greenhouse gas emission. Bioresour Technol 286:121377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang J, Liu X, Huang Y, Huang H (2015) Inoculation with nitrogen turnover bacterial agent appropriately increasing nitrogen and promoting maturity in pig manure composting. Waste Manage 39:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pepe O, Ventorino V, Blaiotta G (2013) Dynamic of functional microbial groups during mesophilic composting of agro-industrial wastes and free-living(N2)-fixing bacteria application. Waste Manage 33(7):1616–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carro L, Pujic P, Trujillo ME, Normand P (2013) Micromonospora is a normal occupant of actinorhizal nodules. J Biosci 38:685–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veyisoglu A, Carro L, Cetin D, Jose MI, Klenk HP, Sahin N (2020) Micromonospora orduensis sp. nov., isolated from deep marine sediment. Anton Leeuw Int J G 113(3):397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Trujillo ME, Riesco R, Benito P, Carro L (2015) Endophytic actinobacteria and the interaction of Micromonospora and nitrogen fixing plants. Front Microbiol 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Muscolo A, Papalia T, Settineri G, Mallamaci C, Jeske-Kaczanowska A (2018) Are raw materials or composting conditions and time that most influence the maturity and/or quality of composts? Comparison of obtained composts on soil properties. J Clean Produc 195:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sembiring L (2000) Selective isolation and characterisation of Streptomyces associated with the rhizosphere of the tropical legume Paraserianthes falcataria (L) Nielsen Ph. D.Thesis. Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne 78:353–366

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hayakawa M, Sadakata T, Kajiura T, Nonomura H (1991) New methods for the highly selective isolation of Micromonospora and Microbispora from soil. J Ferment Bioeng 72:320–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Trujillo ME, Alonso-Vega P, Rodríguez R, Carro L, Cerda E, Alonso P (2010) The genus Micromonospora is widespread in legume root nodules: the example of Lupinus angustifolius. ISME J 4:1265–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cowan ST, Steel KJ (1974) Cowan and Steel’s manual for the identification of medical bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Wei Y, Xu J, Xu N, He Y (2018) Quantitative visualization of lignocellulose components in transverse sections of moso bamboo based on FTIR macro- and micro-spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia DO, Timenetsky J, Martinez MB, Fransisco W, Sinto SI, Yanaguita RM (2002) Proteases (caseinase and elastase), hemolysins, adhesion and susceptibility to antimicrobials of Stenotrophomonasmaltophilia isolates obtained from clinical specimens. Braz J Microbiol 33:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematic. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-Joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bremner JM, Tabatabai MA (1971) Use of automated combustion techniques for Total carbon, Total nitrogen, and total sulfur analysis of soils. In: Walsh LM (ed) Instrumental methods for analysis of soils and plant tissue, 1st edn. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., America, pp 1–15

  31. Jagadabhi PS, Wani SP, Kaushal M, Patil M, Vemula AK, Rathore A (2019) Physico-chemical, microbial and phytotoxicity evaluation of composts from sorghum, finger millet and soybean straws. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 8(3):279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gurbanov R, Tunçer S, Mingu S (2019) Methylation, sugar puckering and Z-form status of DNA from a heavy metal-acclimated freshwater Gordonia sp. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 198:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Martinez-Hidalgo P, Olivares J, Delgado A, Bedmar E, Martinez-Molina E (2014) Endophytic Micromonospora from Medicago sativa are apparently not able to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Soil Biol, Biochem 74:201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martinez-Hidalgo P, Flores-Felix JD, Velazquez E, Brau L, Trujilo ME, Martinez-Molina E (2020) High taxonomic diversity of Micromonospora strains isolated from Medicago sativa nodules in Western Spain and Australia. Syst Appl Microbiol 43:126043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Misra RV, Roy RN, Hiraoka H (2003) On-farm composting methods. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  36. Diaz LF, Bertoldi DM, Bidlingmaier W, Stentiford E (2007) Compost science and technology, 1st ed. Elsevier Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fernandes L, Sartaj M (1997) Comparitive study of static pile composting using natural, forced and passive aeation methods. Compost Sci Util 5(4):65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen M, Huang Y, Liu H, Xie S, Abbas F (2019) Impact of different nitrogen source on compost quality and greenhouse gas emissions during composting of garden waste. Process Saf Environ 124:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Raspolli Galletti AM, D’Alessio A, Licursi D, Antonetti C, Valentini G, Galia A, Di Nasso NN (2015) Midinfrared FT-IR as a tool for monitoring herbaceous biomass composition and its conversion to furfural. J Spectrosc: 719042

  40. Beć KB, Grabska J, Huck CW (2020) Biomolecular and bioanalytical applications of infrared spectroscopy-a review. Anal Chim Acta 9:150–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Grube M, Lin JG, Lee PH, Kokorevicha S (2006) Evaluation of sewage sludge-based compost by FT-IR spectroscopy. Geoderma 130(3–4):324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Calderón FJ, McCarty GW, Reeves JB (2006) Pyrolisis-MS and FT-IR analysis of fresh and decomposed dairy manure. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 76(1–2):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carballo T, Gil MV, Gómez X, Gonzalez-Andres F, Moran A (2008) Characterization of different compost extracts using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermal analysis. Biodegradation 19:815–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tandy S, Healey JR, Nason MA, Williamson JC, Jones DL, Thain SC (2010) FT-IR as an alternative method for measuring chemical properties during composting. Bioresour Technol 101(14):5431–5436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tuomela M, Vikman M, Hatakka A, Itävaara M (2000) Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment: a review. Bioresour Technol 72(2):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Béguin P, Aubert JP (1994) The biological degradation of cellulose. FEMS Microbiol Rev 13(1):25–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lotfi S, Boffito DC, Patience GS (2016) Gas-solid conversion of lignin to carboxylic acids. React Chem Eng 1:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kang J, Irmak S, Wilkins M (2019) Conversion of lignin into renewable carboxylic acid compounds by advanced oxidation processes. Renew Energy 135:951–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Janusz G, Pawlik A, Sulej J, Swiderska-Burek U, Jarozs-Wilkolazksa A, Pasczynski A (2017) Lignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41(6):941–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Horwart W (2007) Carbon cycling and formation of soil organic matter. In: Paul EA (ed) Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry (Third Edition), Third Edit. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jaita S, Phakhodee W, Chairungsi N, Pattarawarapan M (2018) Mechanochemical synthesis of primary amides from carboxylic acids using TCT/NH4SCN. Tetrahedron Lett 59(39):3571–3573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lopez-Gonzalez JA, Lopez MJ, Vargas-Garcia MC, Suarez-Estrella F, Jurado M, Moreno J (2013) Tracking organic matter and microbiota dynamics during the stages of lignocellulosic waste composting. Bioresour Technol 146:574–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Paradelo R, Moldes AB, Barral MT (2013) Evolution of organic matter during the mesophilic composting of lignocellulosic winery wastes. J Environ Manage 116(15):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Cáceres R, Malińska K, Marfà O (2018) Nitrification within composting: a review. Waste Manage 72:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zeng Y, De Guardia A, Ziebal C, De Macedo FJ, Dabert P (2013) Impact of biodegradation of organic matters on ammonia oxidation in compost. Bioresour Technol 136:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cuong TX, Ullah H, Datta A, Hanh TC (2017) Effects of silicon-based fertilizer on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of rice in tropical zone of Vietnam. Rice Sci 24(5):283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Song Z, Wang H, Strong PJ, Shan S (2014) Increase of available soil silicon by Si-rich manure for sustainable rice production. Agron Sustain Dev 34:813–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Laird DA, Martens DA, Kingery WL (2001) Nature of clay-humic complexes in an agricultural soil: I. Chemical, biochemical, and spectroscopic analyses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(5):1413–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Martínez Salgado M, Blu R, Janssens M, Fincheira P (2019) Grape pomace compost 759 as a source of organic matter: evolution of quality parameters to evaluate maturity and 760 stability. J Clean Prod 216:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Pampuro N, Bisaglia C, Romano E, Brambilla M, FoppaPedretti E, Cavallo E (2017) Phytotoxicity and chemical characterization of compost derived from pig slurry solid fraction for organic pellet production. Agriculture 7(11):94 (1-10)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK 217O238) and Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Research Fund (2018–02. BŞEÜ.25–02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levent Degirmenci.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors agreed with the content of the work.

Consent for publication

The present work was submitted based on considerations given in authorship principles of the journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 350 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumas, A., Ertekin, S.G., Gurbanov, R. et al. Effect of Micromonospora sp. KSC08 on nitrogen conservation throughout composting. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 2375–2390 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01662-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01662-z

Keywords

Navigation