Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Selective deoxygenation of waste chicken fat over sulfided and reduced Co-Mo-La/γAl2O3 as catalysts for the sustainable production of renewable fuel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sulfided and reduced Co-Mo-La/γAl2O3 were prepared and examined as catalysts in the selective deoxygenation of waste chicken fat (WCF) to produce gas oil–like hydrocarbons. The effect of reaction conditions was investigated in terms of reaction temperature, reaction pressure, and liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV). The results revealed that the hydrodeoxygenation reaction is favored over the sulfided Co-Mo-La/γAl2O3, while the decarbonylation and decarboxylation reactions are favored over the reduced Co-Mo-La/γAl2O3. It was found that the use of lower LHSV and higher pressure suppresses the decarbonylation and decarboxylation reactions, and consequently the generation of CO and CO2 is minimized. The results also showed that the reduced Co-Mo-La/γAl2O3 catalyst consumes higher amounts of hydrogen, which can be attributed to the methanation reaction, and thus, the composition of the product is heavily dependent on the initial H2 pressure, temperature, and LHSV as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taromi AA, Kaliaguine S (2018) Green diesel production via continuous hydrotreatment of triglycerides over mesostructured γ-alumina supported NiMo/CoMo catalysts. Fuel Process Technol 171:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Furimsky E (2013) Hydroprocessing challenges in biofuels production. Catal Today 217:13–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De S, Luque R (2014) Upgrading of waste oils into transportation fuels using hydrotreating technologies. Biofuel Res J 1(4):107–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ejikeme P, Anyaogu I, Egbuonu C, Eze V (2013) Pig-fat (lard) derivatives as alternative diesel fuel in compression ignition engines. J Pet Technol Altern Fuel 4(1):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdoli MA, Mohamadi F, Ghobadian B, Fayyazi E (2014) Effective parameters on biodiesel production from feather fat oil as a cost-effective feedstock. Int J Environ Res 8(1):139–148

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hemmat Y, Ghobadian B, Loghavi M, Kamgar S, Fayyazi E (2013) Biodiesel fuel production from resdual animal fat as an inedible and inexpensive feedstock. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 5(1):84–91

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koike N, Hosokai S, Takagaki A, Nishimura S, Kikuchi R, Ebitani K, Suzuki Y, Oyama ST (2016) Upgrading of pyrolysis bio-oil using nickel phosphide catalysts. J Catal 333:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang M, Luo J, Fang Z, Li H (2016) Biodiesel production catalyzed by highly acidic carbonaceous catalysts synthesized via carbonizing lignin in sub-and super-critical ethanol. Appl Catal B Environ 190:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang W-C, Tao L (2016) Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53:801–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel M, Kumar A (2016) Production of renewable diesel through the hydroprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass-derived bio-oil: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:1293–1307

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Rathore V, Newalkar BL, Badoni R (2016) Processing of vegetable oil for biofuel production through conventional and non-conventional routes. Energy Sustain Dev 31:24–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu J, Jiang J, Zhao J (2016) Thermochemical conversion of triglycerides for production of drop-in liquid fuels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi D, Arroyo-Ramírez L, Vohs JM (2016) The use of bimetallics to control the selectivity for the upgrading of lignin-derived oxygenates: reaction of anisole on Pt and PtZn catalysts. J Catal 340:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weber GM, Windisch W (2017) Producing sufficient animal-source protein for the growing world population. Sustainable nutrition in a changing world. Springer, pp 321–334

  15. Hanafi SA, Elmelawy MS, Shalaby NH, El-Syed HA, Eshaq G, Mostafa MS (2016) Hydrocracking of waste chicken fat as a cost effective feedstock for renewable fuel production: a kinetic study. Egypt J Pet 25(4):531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nuhu S, Kovo A (2015) Production and characterization of biodiesel from chicken fat. Scholarly J Agric Sci 5(1):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kirubakaran M (2018) Eggshell as heterogeneous catalyst for synthesis of biodiesel from high free fatty acid chicken fat and its working characteristics on a CI engine. J Environ Chem Eng

  18. Sander A, Košćak MA, Kosir D, Milosavljević N, Vuković JP, Magić L (2018) The influence of animal fat type and purification conditions on biodiesel quality. Renew Energy 118:752–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Purandaradas A, Silambarasan T, Murugan K, Babujanarthanam R, Gandhi AD, Dhandapani KV, Anbumani D, Kavitha P (2018) Development and quantification of biodiesel production from chicken feather meal as a cost-effective feedstock by using green technology. Biochem Biophys Rep 14:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  20. USDA F. Livestock and poultry: world markets and trade. March; 2006

  21. Van Gerpen JH, Peterson CL, Goering CE (2007) Biodiesel: an alternative fuel for compression ignition engines. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers

  22. Maity SK (2015) Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: part I. Renew Sust Energ Rev 43:1427–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Olkiewicz M, Plechkova NV, Earle MJ, Fabregat A, Stüber F, Fortuny A, Font J, Bengoa C (2016) Biodiesel production from sewage sludge lipids catalysed by Brønsted acidic ionic liquids. Appl Catal B Environ 181:738–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanafi S, Arief M, Al-Amrousi E (2014) Optimizing the biofuel production by hydrotreating jojoba oil. Int J Acad Res 6(3)

  25. El Khatib S, Hanafi S, Arief M, Al-Amrousi E (2015) Hydrocracking of jojoba oil for green fuel production. J Pet Sci Technol 5(2):59–69

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anand M, Farooqui SA, Kumar R, Joshi R, Kumar R, Sibi MG, Singh H, Sinha AK (2016) Kinetics, thermodynamics and mechanisms for hydroprocessing of renewable oils. Appl Catal A Gen 516:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tóth C, Sági D, Hancsók J (2016) Straight run gas oil as sulphur compound to preserve the sulphide state of the hydroprocessing catalyst of triglycerides. J Clean Prod 111:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grosso-Giordano NA, Eaton TR, Bo Z, Yacob S, Yang C-C, Notestein JM (2016) Silica support modifications to enhance Pd-catalyzed deoxygenation of stearic acid. Appl Catal B Environ 192:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao X, Wei L, Cheng S, Kadis E, Cao Y, Boakye E, Gu Z, Julson J (2016) Hydroprocessing of carinata oil for hydrocarbon biofuel over Mo-Zn/Al2O3. Appl Catal B Environ 196:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hanafi S, Elmelawy M, El-Syed H, Shalaby NH (2015) Hydrocracking of waste cooking oil as renewable fuel on NiW/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. J Adv Catal Sci Techno 2:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Arun N, Sharma RV, Dalai AK (2015) Green diesel synthesis by hydrodeoxygenation of bio-based feedstocks: strategies for catalyst design and development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 48:240–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Knothe G, Razon LF (2017) Biodiesel fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci 58:36–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kordulis C, Bourikas K, Gousi M, Kordouli E, Lycourghiotis A (2016) Development of nickel based catalysts for the transformation of natural triglycerides and related compounds into green diesel: a critical review. Appl Catal B Environ 181:156–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xin H, Guo K, Li D, Yang H, Hu C (2016) Production of high-grade diesel from palmitic acid over activated carbon-supported nickel phosphide catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 187:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Samia A, Mohammed M, Faramawy S, Ahmed S, Ahmed H (2015) Influence of Pt nanoparticles modified by La and Ce oxides on catalytic dehydrocyclization of n-alkanes. Egypt J Pet 24(2):163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Charisiou N, Siakavelas G, Papageridis K, Baklavaridis A, Tzounis L, Avraam D et al (2016) Syngas production via the biogas dry reforming reaction over nickel supported on modified with CeO2 and/or La2O3 alumina catalysts. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 31:164–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dan M, Mihet M, Tasnadi-Asztalos Z, Imre-Lucaci A, Katona G, Lazar MD (2015) Hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming on nickel catalysts: effect of support modification by CeO2 and La2O3. Fuel 147:260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Laurent E, Delmon B (1994) Study of the hydrodeoxygenation of carbonyl, car☐ ylic and guaiacyl groups over sulfided CoMo/γ-Al2O3 and NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalysts: I. catalytic reaction schemes. Appl Catal A Gen 109(1):77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed E. ElMetwally.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanafi, S.A., Elmelawy, M.S., Eshaq, G. et al. Selective deoxygenation of waste chicken fat over sulfided and reduced Co-Mo-La/γAl2O3 as catalysts for the sustainable production of renewable fuel. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 9, 625–632 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00467-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00467-5

Keywords

Navigation