Abstract
Size reduction is an unavoidable operation for preparing biomass for biofuels and bioproduct conversion. Yet, there is considerable uncertainty in power input requirement and the uniformity of ground biomass. Considerable gains are possible if the required power input for a size reduction ratio is estimated accurately. In this research, three well-known mechanistic equations attributed to Rittinger, Kick, and Bond available for predicting energy input for grinding pine wood chips by hammer mill were tested against experimental grinding data. Prior to testing, samples of pine wood chips were conditioned to 11.7 % wb, moisture content. The wood chips were successively ground in a hammer mill using screen sizes of 25.4, 10, 6.4, and 3.2 mm. The input power and the flow of material into the hammer mill were recorded continuously. The recorded power input vs. mean particle size showed that the Rittinger equation had the best fit to the experimental data. The ground particle sizes were four to seven times smaller than the size of the installed screen. Geometric mean size of particles were calculated using two methods: (1) Tyler sieves and using particle size analysis and (2) Sauter mean diameter calculated from the ratio of volume to surface that were estimated from measured length and width. The two mean diameters agreed well, pointing to the fact that either mechanical sieving or particle imaging can be used to characterize particle size. Specific energy input to the hammer mill increased from 1.4 kWh t−1 (5.2 J g−1) for large 25.1-mm screen to 25 kWh t−1 (90.4 J g−1) for small 3.2-mm screen.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PWC:
-
Pine Wood Chips
- wb:
-
Wet basis
- o.d:
-
Oven dry
- C :
-
Intercepts
- d :
-
Particle size, mm
- E :
-
Specific energy, kWh t−1 (J g−1)
- k :
-
Constant
- K :
-
Constant
- L :
-
Characteristic particle size equal to d gw, mm
- P :
-
Power consumption, W
- S :
-
Surface area, mm2
- V :
-
Volume, mm3
- 0 :
-
Empty
- 32 :
-
Sauter mean, 3 represent volume, 2 represent surface area
- B :
-
Bond
- F :
-
Feed particles
- gw :
-
Geometric mean by mass
- i :
-
Sieve number
- K :
-
Kick
- P :
-
Product particles
- R :
-
Rittinger
References
Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S (2004) Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 27:339–352. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.03.007
Bitra VSP, Womac AR, Chevanan N, Miu PI, Igathinathane C, Sokhansanj S, Smith DR (2009) Direct mechanical energy measures of hammer mill comminution of switchgrass, wheat straw, and corn stover and analysis of their particle size distributions. Powder Technol 193(1):32–45. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.02.010
Adapa P, Tabil L, Schoenau G (2011) Grinding performance and physical properties of non-treated and steam exploded barley, canola, oat and wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy 35(1):549–561. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.10.004
Miao Z, Grift TE, Hansen AC, Ting KC (2011) Energy requirement for comminution of biomass in relation to particle physical properties. Ind Crop Prod 33(2):504–513. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.016
Naimi LJ, Sokhansanj S, Bi X, Lim CJ, Womac AR, Lau AK, Melin S (2013) Development of size reduction equations for calculating energy input for grinding lignocellulosic particles. Appl Eng Agric 29(1):93–100
Naimi LJ, Oveisi E, Sokhansanj S, Sowlati T, Lau AK, Bi X, Lim CJ, Melin S, Igathinathane C, Skea D, Day K, MacDonald J, Sauder T, Womac A (2009) The performance (quality) of size reduction of woody biomass. In: ASAE Paper No. 097957.Vol 0300. St. Joseph, Mich: ASABE
Groover MC (2011) A comparison of chipper productivity, chip characteristics, and nutrient removals from two woody biomass harvesting treatments. Blacksburg, VA
Esteban LS, Carrasco JE (2006) Evaluation of different strategies for pulverization of forest biomasses. Powder Technol 166(3):139–151. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2006.05.018
Phanphanich M, Mani S (2011) Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour Technol 102(2):1246–1253. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.028
Gil M, González A, Gil A (2008) Evaluation of milling energy requirements of biomass residues in a semi-industrial pilot plant for co-firing. 17th Eur Biomass Conf Exhib. http://teide.cps.unizar.es:8080/pub/publicir.nsf/codigospub/0497/$FILE/cp0497a.pdf
Gravelsins RJ (1998) Studies of grinding of wood and bark-wood mixtures with the szego mill. Thesis (Ph.D.), University of Toronto
Walker DR, Shaw MC (1954) A physical explanation of the empirical laws of comminution. AIME Trans 313-320
Earle R, Earle M (1966) Unit operations in food processing
Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO (1997) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook http://knovel.com/web/portal/browse/display?_EXT_KNOVEL_DISPLAY_bookid=48&VerticalID=0
Carpinteri A, Pugno N (2005) Are scaling laws on strength of solids related to mechanics or to geometry? Nat Mater 4(6):421–423. doi:10.1038/nmat1408
Bond FC (1952) The third theory of comminution. Trans AIME Min Eng 193:484–494. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2006.01.007
Bond FC (1961) Crushing and grinding calculations part I. Br Chamical Eng 6(6):378–385
Stamboliadis ET (2002) A contribution to the relationship of energy and particle size in the comminution of brittle particulate materials. Miner Eng 15(10):707–713. doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(02)00185-1
Carpinteri A, Pugno N (2003) A multifractal comminution approach for drilling scaling laws. Powder Technol 131(1):93–98. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(02)00335-2
Gongbo LI, Xiaohe XU (1993) Experimental investigation of the energy-size reduction relationship in comminution using fractal theory 6(2):163–172
Hukki RT (1962) Proposal for a solomonic settlement between the theories of von Rittinger, Kick and Bond. AIME Trans 223:403–408
Carpinteri A, Pugno N (2002) One, two, and three-dimensional universal laws for fragmentation due to impact and explosion. J Appl Mech 69(6):854. doi:10.1115/1.1488937
ANSI/ASAE S358.3 (2012) Moisture measurement—forages. ASAE Stand
Pasikatan MC, Milliken GA, Steele JL, Spillman CK, Haque E (2001) Modeling the size properties of first-break ground wheat. Trans ASAE 44(6):1727–1735
Ramakrishnan KN (2000) Modified Rosin Rammler equation for describing particle size distribution of milled powders. J Mater Sci Lett 19(21):1903–1906. doi:10.1023/A:1006742928764
ANSI/ASAE S319.3 (2003) Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by sieving. ASAE Stand
Rasband W (2012) ImageJ. U S Natl Institutes Heal Bethesda, Maryland, USA: http://Imagej.nih.gov/ij/
Eskin DI, Dorokhov IN, Vasil’kov OI, Voropaev SN (2001) Modeling and optimization of jet milling. Theor Found Chem Eng 35(2):188–195. doi:10.1023/A:1010389825366
Tannous K, Lam PS, Sokhansanj S, Grace JR (2013) Physical properties for flow characterization of ground biomass from Douglas-fir wood. Part Sci Technol 31:291–300. doi:10.1080/02726351.2012.732676
Agblevor FA, Besler S (1996) Inorganic compounds in biomass feedstocks. 1. Effect on the quality of fast pyrolysis oils. Energy Fuel 10(2):293–298. doi:10.1021/ef950202u
Jia D, Cathary O, Peng J, Bi X, Lim CJ, Sokhansanj S, Liu Y, Wang R, Tsutsumi A (2015) Fluidization and drying of biomass particles in a vibrating fluidized bed with pulsed gas flow. Fuel Process Technol 138:471–482. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.06.023
Temmerman M, Jensen PD, Hébert J (2013) Von Rittinger theory adapted to wood chip and pellet milling, in a laboratory scale hammermill. Biomass Bioenergy 56:70–81. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.04.020
Naimi LJ (2015) Biomass size reduction for making dense pellets. Thesis (Ph.D.) University of British Columbia
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to Fibreco Export Inc. North Vancouver, BC, for providing pine wood chips. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant provided the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naimi, L.J., Collard, F., Bi, X. et al. Development of size reduction equations for calculating power input for grinding pine wood chips using hammer mill. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 6, 397–405 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0195-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0195-1