Skip to main content
Log in

Direct, CMOS In-Line Process Flow Compatible, Sub 100 °C Cu–Cu Thermocompression Bonding Using Stress Engineering

  • Published:
Electronic Materials Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diffusion of atoms across the boundary between two bonding layers is the key for achieving excellent thermocompression Wafer on Wafer bonding. In this paper, we demonstrate a novel mechanism to increase the diffusion across the bonding interface and also shows the CMOS in-line process flow compatible Sub 100 °C Cu–Cu bonding which is devoid of Cu surface treatment prior to bonding. The stress in sputtered Cu thin films was engineered by adjusting the Argon in-let pressure in such a way that one film had a compressive stress while the other film had tensile stress. Due to this stress gradient, a nominal pressure (2 kN) and temperature (75 °C) was enough to achieve a good quality thermocompression bonding having a bond strength of 149 MPa and very low specific contact resistance of 1.5 × 10−8 Ω-cm2. These excellent mechanical and electrical properties are resultant of a high quality Cu–Cu bonding having grain growth between the Cu films across the boundary and extended throughout the bonded region as revealed by Cross-sectional Transmission Electron Microscopy. In addition, reliability assessment of Cu–Cu bonding with stress engineering was demonstrated using multiple current stressing and temperature cycling test, suggests excellent reliable bonding without electrical performance degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Im, S., Banerjee, K.: Full chip thermal analysis of planar (2-D) and vertically integrated (3-D) high performance ICs. In: Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 727–730. IEEE (2000)

  2. Xie, Y.: Processor architecture design using 3D integration technology. In: 23rd International Conference on VLSI Design, pp. 446–451. IEEE (2010)

  3. Xu, Z., Lu, J.Q.: High-speed design and broadband modeling of through-strata-vias (TSVs) in 3D integration. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 1(2), 154–162 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ko, C.T., Chen, K.N.: Wafer-level bonding/stacking technology for 3D integration. Microelectron. Reliab. 50(4), 481–488 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Save, D., Braud, F., Torres, J., Binder, F., Muller, C., Weidner, J.O., Hasse, W.: Electromigration resistance of copper interconnects. Microelectron. Eng. 33(1), 75–84 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takagi, H., Kikuchi, K., Maeda, R., Chung, T.R., Suga, T.: Surface activated bonding of silicon wafers at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68(16), 2222–2224 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan, C.S., Lim, D.F., Singh, S.G., Goulet, S.K., Bergkvist, M.: Cu–Cu diffusion bonding enhancement at low temperature by surface passivation using self-assembled monolayer of alkane-thiol. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(19), 192108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosh, T., Krushnamurthy, K., Panigrahi, A.K., Dutta, A., Subrahmanyam, C., Vanjari, S.R.K., Singh, S.G.: Facile non thermal plasma based desorption of self assembled monolayers for achieving low temperature and low pressure Cu–Cu thermo-compression bonding. RSC Adv. 5(125), 103643–103648 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, Y.P., Chien, Y.S., Tzeng, R.N., Shy, M.S., Lin, T.H., Chen, K.H., Chiu, C.T., Chiou, J.C., Chuang, C.T., Hwang, W., Tong, H.M., Chen, K.N.: Novel Cu-to-Cu bonding with Ti passivation at 180 °C in 3-D integration. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34(12), 1551–1553 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Panigrahi, A.K., Bonam, S., Ghosh, T., Singh, S.G., Vanjari, S.R.K.: Ultra-thin Ti passivation mediated breakthrough in high quality Cu-Cu bonding at low temperature and pressure. Mater. Lett. 169, 269–272 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, Y.P., Chien, Y.S., Tzeng, R.N., Chen, K.N.: Demonstration and electrical performance of Cu–Cu bonding at 150 °C with Pd passivation. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 62(8), 2587–2592 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Panigrahi, A.K., Bonam, S., Ghosh, T., Vanjari, S.R.K., Singh, S.G.: High quality fine-pitch Cu–Cu wafer-on-wafer bonding with optimized Ti passivation at 160 °C. In: IEEE 66th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 1791–1796 (2016)

  13. Panigrahi, A.K., Ghosh, T., Vanjari, S.R.K., Singh, S.G.: Oxidation resistive, CMOS compatible copper based alloy ultrathin films as a superior passivation mechanism for achieving 150 °C Cu–Cu wafer on wafer thermocompression bonding. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 64, 1239–1245 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Panigrahi, A.K., Ghosh, T., Vanjari, S.R.K., Singh, S.G.: Demonstration of Sub 150 °C Cu–Cu thermocompression bonding for 3D IC applications, utilizing an ultra-thin layer of Manganin alloy as an effective surface passivation layer. Mater. Lett. 194, 86–89 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chua, C.L., Fork, D.K., Van Schuylenbergh, K., Lu, J.P.: Out-of-plane high-Q inductors on low-resistance silicon. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 12(6), 989–995 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perry, J.L.: Effects of sputter deposition parameters on stress in tantalum films with applications to chemical mechanical planarization of copper (2014)

  17. Agrawal, P.M., Rice, B.M., Thompson, D.L.: Predicting trends in rate parameters for self-diffusion on FCC metal surfaces. Surf. Sci. 515(1), 21–35 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng, L., Li, H.Y., Lim, D.F., Gao, S., Tan, C.S.: Thermal reliability of fine pitch Cu–Cu bonding with self assembled monolayer (SAM) passivation for Wafer-on-Wafer 3D-Stacking. In: IEEE 61st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 22–26 (2011)

  19. Enquist, P., Fountain, G., Petteway, C., Hollingsworth, A., Grady, H.: Low cost of ownership scalable copper direct bond interconnect 3D IC technology for three dimensional integrated circuit applications. In: IEEE International 3D Systems Integration Conference, pp. 1–6 (2009)

  20. Beilliard, Y., Coudrain, P., Di Cioccio, L., Moreau, S., Sanchez, L., Montmayeul, B., Signamarcheix, T., Estevez, R., Parry, G.: Chip to wafer copper direct bonding electrical characterization and thermal cycling. In: IEEE 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC), pp. 1–7 (2013)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful for funding support from the Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DietY), Govt. of India and also characterization facilities through Indian Nano electronics User Program (INUP) program from Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiv Govind Singh.

Additional information

Asisa Kumar Panigrahi and Tamal Ghosh have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panigrahi, A.K., Ghosh, T., Kumar, C.H. et al. Direct, CMOS In-Line Process Flow Compatible, Sub 100 °C Cu–Cu Thermocompression Bonding Using Stress Engineering. Electron. Mater. Lett. 14, 328–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-018-0037-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-018-0037-y

Keywords

Navigation