Abstract
Violence against women remains a serious and widespread problem in Australia with enormous impacts and social costs. Recently, there have been renewed government efforts to address gender-based violence in schools through a whole school approach. This approach has come to be known as Respectful Relationships Education (RRE) and supports schools to build cultures and practices of gender respect. Recognition of the need for RRE is well established in Australia with states and territories implementing a range of policy and programme initiatives. This paper presents data generated from a mixed methods evaluation of the implementation and impact of RRE in eighteen Australian primary schools. Our focus is on case study data gathered from two of these schools to illustrate the significance of context in shaping the capacity of schools to take up RRE in the ways it is intended. We identify and analyse the specific situated, professional, material and external factors at these schools that enabled and constrained the implementation of this reform. In light of the continued tendency within policy for schools to be dematerialised (i.e. not seen in relation to the complexities of context), the paper argues for greater attention to matters of context in understanding the differential impact of reforms such as RRE in schools. In particular, we draw attention to the urgency and imperative of differential support to schools in relation to such matters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It is important to qualify this statement. The relevant Department of Education has identified RRE as a priority and has revised policy to these ends.
References
Braun, A., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596.
Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560.
Clark, M. (1999). The great divide: The construction of gender in the primary school. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.
Collins, C., Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2000). Factors influencing the educational performance of males and females in school and their initial destinations after leaving school. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Davies, B. (1994). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Department of Employment Education and Training. (1995). No fear: A whole school approach, facilitators guide. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Flood, M. (2019). Engaging men and boys in violence prevention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Flood, M., Fergus, L., & Heenan, M. (2009). Respectful relationships education: Violence prevention and respectful relationships education in Victorian secondary schools. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
Gilbert, R., & Gilbert, P. (2017). Masculinity goes to school. London: Routledge.
Hill, J. (2019). See what you made me do. Power, control and domestic abuse. Carlton: Black Inc.
Kearney, S., Loksee, L., Ollis, D., Joyce, A., & Gleeson, C. (2016). Respectful Relationships Education in schools: The beginnings of change. Melbourne: Research Report.
Keddie, A. (2012). Educating for diversity and social justice. Routledge: New York.
Keddie, A. (2020). Engaging boys in gender activism: issues of discomfort and emotion. Gender and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1716956.
Keddie, A., & Ollis, D. (2019). Teaching for gender justice: Free to be me? Australian Educational Researcher, 46(3), 533–547.
Lingard, B., et al. (2009). Boys and schooling: Beyond structural reform. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martino, W., & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2003). So what’s a boy: Addressing issues of masculinity in schools. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Maxwell, C., & Aggleton, P. (2014). Preventing violence against women and girls: A ‘whole-school approach’. In J. Ellis & R. Thiara (Eds.), Working with children and young people to prevent violence against women and girls: Lessons for policy and practice (pp. 103–120). Bristol: Policy Press.
Maxwell, C., Chase, E., Warwick, I., Aggleton, P., & Wharf, H. (2010). Freedom to achieve. Preventing violence, promoting equality: A whole-school approach. London: Womenkind Worldwide.
Ollis, D., & Tomaszewski, I. (1993). Gender and violence position paper. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printer. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/45382.
OurWatch. (2015). Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS) and VicHealth, Change the story: A shared framework for the primary prevention of violence against women and their children in Australia. Melbourne: OurWatch.
Singh, P., Heimans, S., & Glasswell, K. (2014). Policy enactment, context and performativity: ontological politics and researching Australian National Partnership policies. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 826–844.
Sobe, N., & Kowalczyk, J. (2012). The problem of context in comparative education research. ECPS Journal, 6, 55–74.
Victorian Government. (2016). Ending family violence: Delivering change. Retrieved 2 February 2019, from https://rcfv.archive.royalcommission.vic.gov.au.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Disclaimer: The paper presents research and analysis conducted by the authors. As such, any comment, opinion and position presented are that of the researchers and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any persons associated with the programmes or organisations featured.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keddie, A., Ollis, D. Context matters: the take up of Respectful Relationships Education in two primary schools. Aust. Educ. Res. 48, 211–225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00398-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00398-5