Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Plant Location Selection: An Integrated Delphi–AHP–PROMETHEE Methodology

  • Research Article - Systems Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection of the appropriate plant location requires joint consideration of multiple alternatives and evaluation criteria because of the system complexity in manufacturing companies. Assessment procedures involve several objectives, and it is often necessary to compromise among possibly conflicting tangible and intangible criteria. Thus, multi-criteria decision making has been found to be a powerful and suitable technique to solve this type of location problem. In this paper, an integrated decision-making methodology is designed that employs the three well-known decision-making techniques, namely Delphi, analytic hierarchical process (AHP), and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) in order to make the best use of information available, either implicitly or explicitly. In this respect, the aim of using the modified Delphi is to select the most influential criteria by a few professional experts or decision makers. The AHP is employed to analyze the structure of the plant location selection problem and to obtain weights of the selected criteria. Then, the PROMETHEE technique is taken into account to assess and rank the location alternatives. Finally, an application in a manufacturing company demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang, T.; Hung, C.C.: Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robotic Comput. Integr. Manuf. 23(1), 126–137 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yong, D.: Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 28, 839–844 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, T.C.: Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. 20, 859–864 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heragu, S.S.: Facility Design, PWS Publishing Company, Boston (1997)

  5. Yoon, K.; Hwang, C.L.: Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: single-plant strategy. Int. J. Prod. Res. 23, 345–359 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liang, G.S.; Wang, M.J.J.: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for facility site selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 29, 2313–2330 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heydar, M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Mousavi, S.M.; Mojtahedi, S.M.H.: Fuzzy multi criteria decision making method for temporary storage design in industrial plants. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM 2008), pp. 1154–1158, Singapore, December 8–11 (2008)

  8. Chou, S.Y.; Chang, Y.H.; Shen, C.Y.: A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189, 132–145 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ertugˇrul,  I.; Karakaşogˇlu, N.: Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 39 , 783–795 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ertugˇrul,  I.; Karakaşogˇlu, N.: Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 702–715 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farahani, R.Z.; Asgari, N.: Combination of MCDM and covering techniques in a hierarchical model for facility location: a case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176, 1839–1858 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Voigt, K.; Bruggemann, R.; Pudenz, S.: A multi-criteria evaluation of environmental databases using the Hasse diagram technique (ProRank) software. Environ. Model. Softw. 21, 1587–1597 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vahdani, B.; Mousavi, S.M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.: Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method. Appl. Math. Model. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.02.040 (2011)

  14. Amiri, M.; Zandieh, M.; Soltani, R.; Vahdani, B.: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 12314–12322 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brans, J.P.; Mareschall, B.: The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multi-criteria decision aid. Decis. Support Syst. 12, 297–310 (1994)

  16. Brans, J.P.; Mareschall, B.: Promethee Methods, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, Berlin (2004)

  17. Dias, L.C.; Costa J.P.; Clímaco, J.N.: A parallel implementation of the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 104, 521–531 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gumus, A.T.: Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 4067–4074 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buyukozkan, G.; Ruan, D.: Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Math. Comput. Simul. 77, 464–475 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Badri, M.A.: Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62, 237–248 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bevilacqua, M.; Braglia, M.: The analytical hierarchical process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 70, 71–83 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Macharis, C.; Springael, J.; Brucker K.D.; Verbeke, A.: PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153, 307–317 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, J.J.; Yang, D.L.: Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Comput. Oper. Res. 34, 3691–3700 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brans, J.P.; Vincke, P.H.: A preference ranking organization method. Manag. Sci. 31, 647–656 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brans, J.P.; Vincke, P.H.; Mareschall, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 14, 228–238 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Albadvi, A.; Chaharsooghi S.K.; Esfahanipour, A.: Decision making in stock trading: an application of PROMETHEE. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, 673–683 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dagdeviren, M.: Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J. Intell. Manuf. 19, 397–406 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tuzkaya, G.; Gülsün, B.; Kahraman, C.; Özgen, D.: An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 2853–2863 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goumas, M.; Lygerou, V.: An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 123, 606–613 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mousavi, S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Heydar, M. et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Plant Location Selection: An Integrated Delphi–AHP–PROMETHEE Methodology. Arab J Sci Eng 38, 1255–1268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0361-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0361-8

Keywords

Navigation