Skip to main content
Log in

Minimal access surgery in children: A 5 year study

  • Research Brief
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over a period of 5 years, we analyzed our data on outcome, feasibility, and safety of Minimal Access Surgery (MAS) in 211 children. The outcome was compared objectively with age matched controls with similar diagnosis undergoing open surgery over the same period. There was no significant difference between mortality, morbidity, re-exploration rates and analgesic requirement between MAS and open surgery. There was a significant difference in the length of stay in hospital, in favour of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, nephrectomy, splenectomy, surgery for intra-abdominal testis compared to open surgery but not for children undergoing surgery for appendicular perforation and intestinal pathology. All parents preferred the cosmetic outcome of minimal access surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Udwadia TE. Laparoscopy in India-A personal perspective. J Minim Access Surg. 2005;1:51–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oak SN, Parlekar SV, Akhtar T. Minimal access surgery in children-5 years institutional experience. J Minim Access Surg. 2005;1:121–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saravanan K, Kumaran V, Rajamani G. Minimally invasive pediatric surgery: our experience. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2008;13:101–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee SL, Yaghoubian A, Kaji A. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparision based on age, sex and perforation status. Arch Surg. 2011;146:1118–1121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2010;6:CD001546.

    Google Scholar 

  6. De U. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: An Indian perspective. J Minim Access Surg. 2005;1:15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deepak J, Agarwal P, Bagdi RK. Paediatric cholelithiasis and Laparoscopic management: A review of twenty two cases. J Minim Access Surg. 2009;5:93–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark JM, Koontz CS, Smith LA. Video assisted transumblical Meckels diverticulectomy in children. Ann Surg. 2008;74:327–329.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schier F. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1081–1084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alzahem A. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniotomy in infants and children: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27:605–612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirsch AJ, Escala J, Duckett JW. Surgical management of nonpalpable testis: The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia experience. J Urol. 1998;159:1340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gundati MS, Patel Y, Duffy PG. An initial experience of 100 paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomise with transperitoneal or posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic approach. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23:795–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murawski M, Patkoswki D, Korlacki W. Laparoscopic splenectomy in children-a multicenter experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:951–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujit K. Chowdhary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chowdhary, S.K., Kandpal, D. Minimal access surgery in children: A 5 year study. Indian Pediatr 49, 971–974 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-012-0246-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-012-0246-7

Key words

Navigation