Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of poison to eliminate predators is causing African vulture populations to collapse. To understand the prevalence and motivations of this practice we conducted an extensive survey with South African commercial farmers. Using a specialised questioning technique and ad hoc quantitative methods we found that an estimated 22% and 31% of farmers used poison over a 1-year and 5-year period, respectively. Poison use hotspots generally coincided with small stock farming areas. The strongest predictor of poison use was whether farmers believed the practice to be common amongst their peers. Our results suggest that farmers’ attitudes to vultures are primarily positive, and farmers are less likely to use poisons if they frequently encounter vultures on their farm. Overall, our findings provide an understanding on poison use that provides leverage points to change farmers’ behaviour and help avert the African vulture crisis and possible cascading ecosystem impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all respondents for their participation and the following individuals for their kind hospitality to a lonely researcher on the road: Vivienne and Mike van Breda, Kabous Louw, Sonja and Jutta Moxham and Rory Evans. Furthermore, Ben J. Dilley, for his carpentry skills and assistance in kitting out our research vehicle. This study was funded by the NRF-DST Centre of Excellence funding to the FitzPatrick Institute of Ornithology. AS was funded by the Academy of Finland (Grant No. 307909).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiaan Willem Brink.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Informed consent was provided before each interview. To ensure anonymity of respondents this consent was obtained verbally. This study was approved by the Faculty of Science Research Ethics Committee at the University of Cape Town (Approval code: FSREC 19—2019).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Compliance with ethical standards

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (PDF 1983 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brink, C.W., Thomson, R.L., Amar, A. et al. Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures. Ambio 50, 1211–1221 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01461-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01461-2

Keywords

Navigation