Abstract
Relative output factors are used in radiation therapy for treatment planning purposes including treatments using kilovoltage X-ray beams. The output factor is the relative dose output for a particular applicator relative to a reference applicator. Due to the differences in the scatter contribution from the inside of an applicator, it is more accurate if output factors are measured for all combinations of X-ray beam energy and applicator. Previously published papers and various kilovoltage X-ray beam dosimetry protocols have discussed the validity of using various cylindrical and parallel plate ionization chambers for relative output factor measurements. In this work, we evaluated the suitability of Gafchromic™ EBT3 film for the determination of output factors for kilovoltage X-ray beams. Output factors were measured with Gafchromic™ EBT3 film for beam qualities of 50, 75, 100 and 125 kVp and applicator sizes of 2, 3, 4 cm diameter, 8 × 8 and 12 × 12 cm2 square applicators. The film read out was performed with a flatbed EPSON Expression 10000XL scanner. The measured data was compared with benchmark data from measurements using an Advanced Markus ionisation chamber as well as comparing with ratios of published backscatter factor values. The agreement between output factors measured with EBT3 film and the ionisation chamber was generally better than 2 %, with the largest difference of 3.3 % occurring for the 2 cm diameter field with the 50 kVp X-ray beam. These differences were consistent with the estimated total uncertainty in the measurements as calculated by the ISO GUM. The agreement between the output factors measured with film and the published BSFs was generally better than 5 % but differences of up to 12 % occurred for the smallest field size. The results demonstrate that Gafchromic™ EBT3 film is a suitable dosimeter for output factor measurements of kilovoltage X-ray beams.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eaton DJ (2012) Quality assurance and independent dosimetry for an intraoperative X-ray device. Med Phys 39(11):6908–6920
Newton J, Oldham M, Thomas A, Li Y, Adamovics J, Kirsch DG, Das S (2011) Commissioning a small-field biological irradiator using point, 2D, and 3D dosimetry techniques. Med Phys 38(12):6754–6762
Poen JC (1999) Clinical applications of orthovoltage radiotherapy: tumours of the skin, endorectal therapy and intraoperative radiation therapy. Kilovoltage x-ray beam dosimetry for radiotherapy and radiobiology. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison
Verhaegen F, Granton P, Tryggestad E (2011) Small animal radiotherapy research platforms. Phys Med Biol 56(12):R55–R83
Mayles P (2007) Kilovoltage X-rays. In: Mayles P, Nahum AE, Rosenwald J (eds) Handbook of radiotherapy physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 439–449
Hill R, Mo Z, Haque M, Baldock C (2009) An evaluation of ionization chambers for the relative dosimetry of kilovoltage X-ray beams. Med Phys 36(9):3971–3981
Ma CM, Coffey CW, DeWerd LA, Liu C, Nath R, Seltzer SM, Seuntjens JP (2001) AAPM protocol for 40–300 kV X-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. Med Phys 28(6):868–893
Li XA, Ma CM, Salhani D (1997) Measurement of percentage depth dose and lateral beam profile for kilovoltage X-ray therapy beams. Phys Med Biol 42(12):2561–2568
Ma CM, Nahum AE (1995) Monte Carlo calculated stem effect correction for NE2561 and NE2571 chambers in medium-energy X-ray beams. Phys Med Biol 40(1):63–72
Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfield K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Laitano F, Smyth V, Vynckier S (2000) Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy, An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, Technical Report Series No. 398. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Klevenhagen SC, Aukett RJ, Harrison RM, Moretti C, Nahum AE, Rosser KE (1996) The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for X-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL; 10–300 kV generating potential). Phys Med Biol 41(12):2605–2625
Evans PA, Moloney AJ, Mountford PJ (2001) Performance assessment of the Gulmay D3300 kilovoltage X-ray therapy unit. Brit J Radiol 74(882):537–547
Gerig L, Soubra M, Salhani D (1994) Beam characteristics of the Therapax DXT300 orthovoltage therapy unit. Phys Med Biol 39(9):1377–1392
Healy BJ, Gibbs A, Murry RL, Prunster JE, Nitschke KN (2005) Output factor measurements for a kilovoltage X-ray therapy unit. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 28(2):115–121
Hill R, Holloway L, Baldock C (2005) A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage X-ray beams. Phys Med Biol 50(21):N331–N344
Jurado D, Eudaldo T, Carrasco P, Jornet N, Ruiz A, Ribas M (2005) Pantak Therapax SXT 150: performance assessment and dose determination using IAEA TRS-398 protocol. Brit J Radiol 78(932):721–732
Grosswendt B (1984) Backscatter factors for X-rays generated at voltages between 10 and 100 kV. Phys Med Biol 29(5):579–591
Kim J, Hill R, Claridge Mackonis E, Kuncic Z (2010) An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage X-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements. Phys Med Biol 55(3):783–797
Klevenhagen SC (1989) Experimentally determined backscatter factors for X-rays generated at voltages between 16 and 140 kV. Phys Med Biol 34(12):1871–1882
Nelson VK, Hill RF (2011) Backscatter factor measurements for kilovoltage X-ray beams using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Radiat Meas 46(12):2097–2099
Smith L, Hill R, Nakano M, Kim J, Kuncic Z (2011) The measurement of backscatter factors of kilovoltage X-ray beams using Gafchromic™ EBT2 film. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 34(2):261–266
Aldelaijan S, Nobah A, Alsbeih G, Moftah B, Aldahlawi I, Alzahrany A, Tomic N, Devic S (2013) Dosimetry of biological irradiations using radiochromic films. Phys Med Biol 58(10):3177
Pidikiti R, Stojadinovic S, Speiser M, Song KH, Hager F, Saha D, Solberg TD (2011) Dosimetric characterization of an image-guided stereotactic small animal irradiator. Phys Med Biol 56(8):2585–2599
Butson MJ, Cheung T, Yu PKN, Alnawaf H (2009) Dose and absorption spectra response of EBT2 Gafchromic film to high energy X-rays. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 32(4):196–202
Chiu-Tsao ST, Ho Y, Shankar R, Wang L, Harrison LB (2005) Energy dependence of response of new high sensitivity radiochromic films for megavoltage and kilovoltage radiation energies. Med Phys 32(11):3350–3354
Devic S (2011) Radiochromic film dosimetry: past, present, and future. Phys Med 27(3):122–134
Devic S, Aldelaijan S, Mohammed H, Tomic N, Liang LH, Deblois F, Seuntjens J (2010) Absorption spectra time evolution of EBT-2 model GAFCHROMIC film. Med Phys 37(5):2207–2214
Rink A, Vitkin IA, Jaffray DA (2007) Energy dependence (75 kVp to 18 MV) of radiochromic films assessed using a real-time optical dosimeter. Med Phys 34(2):458–463
Soares CG (2006) Radiochromic film dosimetry. Radiat Meas 41(Supplement 1):S100–S116
Sutherland JGH, Rogers DWO (2010) Monte Carlo calculated absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film. Med Phys 37(3):1110–1116
Butson MJ, Cheung T, Yu PKN (2007) Radiochromic film for verification of superficial X-ray backscatter factors. Austral Phys Eng Sci Med 30(4):269–273
Fletcher CL, Mills JA (2008) An assessment of Gafchromic film for measuring 50 kV and 100 kV percentage depth dose curves. Phys Med Biol 53(11):N209–N218
Avanzo M, Rink A, Dassie A, Massarut S, Roncadin M, Borsatti E, Capra E (2012) In vivo dosimetry with radiochromic films in low-voltage intraoperative radiotherapy of the breast. Med Phys 39(5):2359–2368
Ebert MA, Asad AH, Siddiqui SA (2009) Suitability of radiochromic films for dosimetry of low energy X-rays. J Appl Clin Med Phys 10(4):232–240
Reinhardt S, Hillbrand M, Wilkens JJ, Assmann W (2012) Comparison of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films for clinical photon and proton beams. Med Phys 39(8):5257–5262
Massillon-JL G, Chiu-Tsao S, Domingo-Munoz I, Chan MF (2012) Energy dependence of the new Gafchromic EBT3 film: dose response curves for 50 kV, 6 and 15 MV X-ray beams. Int J Med Phys Clin Eng Radiat Oncol 1(2):60–65
Devic S, Tomic N, Aldelaijan S, Deblois F, Seuntjens J, Chan MF, Lewis D (2012) Linearization of dose-response curve of the radiochromic film dosimetry system. Med Phys 39(8):4850–4857
Brown TAD, Hogstrom KR, Alvarez D, Matthews Ii KL, Ham K, Dugas JP (2012) Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic X-ray beams. Med Phys 39(12):7412–7417
Moylan R, Aland T, Kairn T (2013) Dosimetric accuracy of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 film for in vivo dosimetry. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 36(3):331–337
Hill R, Kuncic Z, Baldock C (2010) The water equivalence of solid phantoms for low energy photon beams. Med Phys 37(8):4355–4363
Gorjiara T, Hill R, Kim JH, Kuncic Z, Adamovics J, Baldock C (2010) Study of dosimetric water equivalency of PRESAGE® for megavoltage and kilovoltage X-ray beams. J Phys 250:244–248
Blackwell CR, Coursey BM, Gall KP, Galvin JM, McLaughlin WL, Meigooni AS, Nath R, Rodgers JE, Soares CG (1998) Radiochromic film dosimetry: recommendations of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 55. Med Phys 25(11):2093
ISO (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainties in measurement. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva
McEwen MR, Kawrakow I, Ross CK (2008) The effective point of measurement of ionization chambers and the build-up anomaly in MV X-ray beams. Med Phys 35(3):950–958
Hill R (2013) Reporting uncertainties in measurement: what approach should be followed? Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 36(1):1–3
Andrés C, del Castillo A, Tortosa R, Alonso D, Barquero R (2010) A comprehensive study of the Gafchromic EBT2 radiochromic film. A comparison with EBT. Med Phys 37(12):6271–6278
Ma CM, Seuntjens JP (1999) Mass-energy absorption coefficient and backscatter factor ratios for kilovoltage X-ray beams. Phys Med Biol 44(1):131–143
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gill, S., Hill, R. A study on the use of Gafchromic™ EBT3 film for output factor measurements in kilovoltage X-ray beams. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 36, 465–471 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-013-0226-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-013-0226-9