Skip to main content
Log in

ε-Subgame Perfectness of an Open-Loop Stackelberg Equilibrium in Linear-State Games

  • Published:
Dynamic Games and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open-loop Stackelberg equilibria in linear-state games are subgame perfect. This result holds under the hypothesis of unconstrained final state; whereas we need to take into account suitable final-state conditions in order to correctly formalize certain economic problems. A striking contribution of this paper is that it tackles the consistency problem for an open-loop Stackelberg equilibrium in linear-state games with a final-state constraint in the leader’s problem. In this paper, after proving that such a type of equilibrium is not subgame perfect, we introduce a weaker definition of subgame perfectness, which we call ε-subgame perfectness. This new definition can be applied to the open-loop Stackelberg equilibrium of a constrained linear-state game. Finally, we present some explanatory examples to show how the definition of ε-subgame perfectness can be meaningful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Başar T, Olsder GJ (1999) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Classics in applied mathematics, vol 23. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia. Reprint of the second (1995) edition

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckdahn R, Cardaliaguet P, Quincampoix M (2011) Some recent aspects of differential game theory. Dyn Games Appl 1(1):74–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cellini R, Lambertini L (2008) Weak and strong time consistency in a differential oligopoly game with capital accumulation. J Optim Theory Appl 138(1):17–26

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cellini R, Lambertini L, Leitmann G (2005) Degenerate feedback and time consistency in differential games. In: Hofer EP, Reithmeier E (eds) Modeling and control of autonomous decision support based systems, proceedings of the 13th workshop on dynamics and control. Shaker, Aachen, pp 185–192

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dockner EJ, Jørgensen S, Van Long N, Sorger G (2000) Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Grass D, Caulkins P, Feichtinger G, Tragler G, Behrens DA (2008) Optimal control of nonlinear processes. With applications in drugs, corruption, and terror. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jørgensen S, Martín-Herrán G, Zaccour G (2010) The Leitmann–Schmitendorf advertising differential game. Appl Math Comput 217(3):1110–1116

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Seierstad A, Knut S (1987) Optimal control theory with economic applications. In: Advanced textbooks in economics, vol 24. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Takayama A (1985) Mathematical economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Michèle Breton for the useful and heartfelt suggestions given to the authors during the Third Workshop on Dynamic Games in Management Science at HEC Montreal. The clarity of the paper has definitely been improved by the precise comments of the referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Buratto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buratto, A., Grosset, L. & Viscolani, B. ε-Subgame Perfectness of an Open-Loop Stackelberg Equilibrium in Linear-State Games. Dyn Games Appl 2, 269–279 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-012-0046-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-012-0046-7

Keywords

Navigation