Skip to main content
Log in

Obstetric Complications of Donor Egg Conception Pregnancies

  • Review Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ovum donation (OD) pregnancies are becoming increasingly common. Obstetric complications with IVF pregnancies are well documented. However, until recently OD had not previously been investigated as a separate subtype of this. It could be postulated that there may be more complications with OD pregnancies as the embryo is immunologically different to the mother. The subsequent allograft reactions can cause problems with placental development and function leading to pathology. Initial studies investigating OD pregnancies were inadequate due to small sample size and inappropriate control groups. Studies specifically comparing to spontaneous pregnancies alone are not suitable when we already know that IVF in itself increases the risk to both mother and baby. Recent research has optimised the control group by using women undergoing IVF with autologous ovum. Ovum donation has now been shown to be an independent risk factor for hypertensive disease in pregnancy, post-partum haemorrhage and increased risk of caesarean section. Neonatal outcomes are less clear-cut, although there is some evidence to suggest there is increased risk of small for gestational age babies and preterm delivery. It is now clear that OD pregnancies are higher risk than IVF pregnancies with autologous ovum and they should be treated as such. Women with ovum donation pregnancies should have obstetric-led care, in a unit which has ready access to both blood transfusion and cell salvage. Future research should investigate how to reduce the risk of ovum donation to these women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HFEA. Fertility treatment in 2013: trends and figures. Human Fertilisation and Embryology authority United Kingdom; 2014

  2. Elenis E, Svanberg AS, Lampic C, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation: a retrospective cohort case study in Sweden. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeve YB, Potdar N, Opoku A, et al. Donor oocyte conception and pregnancy complications; a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG [online] (2016). Accessed http://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13910/abstract. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

  4. Storgaard M, Loft A, Bergh C, et al. Obstetric and neonatal complications in pregnancies conceived after oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017;124:561–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Ray C, Scherier S, Anselem O, et al. Association between oocyte donation and maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 43 years or older. Hum Reprod. 2012;127(3):896–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guilbaud L, Santulli P, Studer E, et al. Impact of oocyte donation on perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):948–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams DH, Clark RA, Davies MJ, et al. A meta-analysis of neonatal health outcomes from oocyte donation. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2015;27:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garner J, Richardson A, Gopaldas P, et al. A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes of 79 ovum donation pregnancies compared to 234 autologous IVF controls. J Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2017;1(1):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stoop D, Baumgarten M, Haentjens P, et al. Obstetric outcome in donor oocyte pregnancies: a matched-pair analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10(42):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tarlatzi TB, Imbert R, Mercadal BA, et al. Does oocyte donation compared with autologous oocyte IVF pregnancies have a higher risk of preeclampsia? Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Woo I, Hindoyan R, Landay M, et al. Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):993–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Soderstrom-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, et al. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(2):260–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sunkara SK, Antonisamy B, Selliah HY, et al. Perinatal outcomes after gestational surrogacy versus autologous IVF: analysis of national data. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:708–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Amit Shah is a consultant in Reproductive Medicine and Surgery at Homerton University Hospital, London; Dr. Maryam Parisaei, FRCOG, is a Consultant Obstetrician at Homerton Hospital, London; Dr. Jessica Garner is a Speciality Trainee in Obstetrics and Gynecology at Homerton Hospital, London.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, A., Parisaei, M. & Garner, J. Obstetric Complications of Donor Egg Conception Pregnancies. J Obstet Gynecol India 69, 395–398 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01211-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01211-9

Keywords

Navigation