Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Thromboelastography Versus Coagulation Screen as a Safety Predictor in Pre-eclampsia/Eclampsia Patients Undergoing Lower-Segment Caesarean Section in Regional Anaesthesia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we aimed to correlate thromboelastography (TEG) variables versus conventional coagulation profile in all patients presenting with pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and to see whether TEG would be helpful for evaluating coagulation in parturients before regional anaesthesia.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective study on 100 pre-eclampsia/eclampsia patients undergoing lower-segment caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. Two blood samples were collected. First sample was used for TEG measurement and second sample for laboratory tests. The following TEG data were obtained—reaction time, kinetic time, alpha angle, and maximum amplitude (MA). The following laboratory tests were obtained—haematology (haemoglobin, TLC, DLC, platelet count) and coagulation test [prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT)].

Result

Out of 100 patients enrolled in the study, 80 (80 %) had a normal coagulation profile, while remaining 20 (20 %) had hypocoagulation profile. The results show that TEG parameters have a good correlation with conventional coagulation profile and also showed excellent independent predictive efficacy for prediction of hypocoagulation. PT, aPTT, and TT were directly proportional to R-time and K-time and inversely proportional to alpha angle (p < 0.001). Platelet count showed a strong positive correlation with MA (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

By giving a global picture of haemostasis, TEG can lead to improved decision-making about safety of using regional anaesthesia. Its fast feedback time makes it ideal for monitoring in a fast moving situation such as in obstetric emergency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orlikowski CEP, Rocke DA, Murray WB, et al. Thromboelastography changes in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:157–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunningham FG, Prichard JA. Hematologic considerations of pregnancy induced hypertension. Semin Perinatol. 1978;2:29–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartert H. Blutgerinnung studien mit der thromboelastographie, einen Neuen Untersuchingsverfahen. Klin Wochenschr. 1948;1948(26):577–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mallett SV, Cox DJA. Thrombelastography. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:307–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong CA, Liu S, Glassenberg R. Comparison of thromboelastography with common coagulation tests in preeclampsia and healthy parturients. Reg Anesth. 1995;20:521–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vandermeulen EP, Van Aken H, Vermylen J. Anticoagulants and spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:1165–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Voulgatopoulos DS, Palmer CM. Coagulation studies in the preeclamptic parturient: a survey. J Clin Anesth Analg. 1994;79:1165–77.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leduc L, Wheeler JM, Kirshon B, et al. Coagulation profile in severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:14–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Othman M, Falcon BJ, Kadir R. Global hemostasis in pregnancy: are we using thromboelastography to its full potential ? Epub. 2010;36(7):738–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Narani KK. Thromboelastography in the perioperative period. Indian J Anaesth. 2005;49(2):89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zuckerman L, Cohen E, Vagher JP, et al. Comparison of thromboelastography with common coagulation tests. Thromb Haemost. 1981;46:752–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma S, Dadarkar P, Philip J, et al. Assessment of whole blood coagulation using modified thromboelastography in women with severe preeclampsia, Dept of Anesthesiology and pain mgmt, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; 2002, A-1056.

  13. White H, Zollinger C, Jones M, et al. Can Thromboelastography performed on kaolin-activated citrated samples from critically ill patients provide stable and consistent parameters. Int J Lab Hematol. 2010;32(2):167–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asrar Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Monica Kohli, Dr. Anita Malik, Dr. Megha Kohli, Dr. Jaishri Bogra, Dr. Haider Abbas, Dr. Rajni Gupta, Dr. B. B. Kushwaha declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national).

Additional information

Dr. Asrar Ahmad M.D. (Anesthesiology), Assistant Professor, T. S. Mishra Medical College and Hospital; Prof. Monica Kohli M.D. (Anesthesiology), PDCC, Professor, King George’s Medical University; Prof. Anita Malik M.D. (Anesthesiology), Professor, King George’s Medical University; Dr. Megha Kohli, Junior Resident 3 (Anesthesiology and Intensive Care), Maulana Azad Medical College; Prof. Jaishri Bogra D.A., M.D. (Anesthesiology), Professor, King George’s Medical University; Prof. Haider Abbas M.D. (Anesthesiology), Professor, King George’s Medical University; Prof. Rajni Gupta M.D. (Anesthesiology), Professor, King George’s Medical University; Dr. B. B. Kushwaha M.D. (Anesthesiology), Associate Professor, King George’s Medical University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, A., Kohli, M., Malik, A. et al. Role of Thromboelastography Versus Coagulation Screen as a Safety Predictor in Pre-eclampsia/Eclampsia Patients Undergoing Lower-Segment Caesarean Section in Regional Anaesthesia. J Obstet Gynecol India 66 (Suppl 1), 340–346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0906-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0906-y

Keywords

Navigation