Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of different concentrations of phosphorus on microbial communities in soybean rhizosphere grown in two types of soils

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial communities in plant rhizosphere interact in a complicated manner among soil types, plant genotypes and soil environmental conditions. In this study, the effects of phosphorus (P) nutrition on microbial community structures in soybean rhizosphere were examined in a pot experiment. Soybean genotypes of Dongsheng 1 and Suinong 14 grew in two kinds of sand/soil (4:1, v/v) mixed cultural media with application of three P levels of P0 (0 mg kg−1), P1 (15 mg kg−1) and P2 (40 mg kg−1). The bacterial and fungal communities in soybean rhizosphere at the start of the pod stage (R3) were examined based on the polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) banding patterns of partial 16S rDNA and 18S rDNA ITS regions and sequencing methods. Principal component analysis based on DGGE banding patterns showed that the soil type was the dominant factor in changing both bacterial and fungal communities in the soybean rhizosphere. However, separated principal component analysis based on individual soil showed that the microbial community structures were also influenced by soybean genotypes and soil P concentrations, and the influences of P were greater than those of genotypes. BLAST search of sequence data generated from excised DGGE bands indicated that bacteria belonging to Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Bacteriodetes and Gemmatimonadetes, and fungi belonging to Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes commonly inhabited the soybean rhizosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Aislabie JM, Chhour KL, Saul DJ, Miyauchi S, Ayton J, Paetzold RF, Balks MR (2006) Dominant bacteria in soils of marble point and wright valley, victoria land, Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 10:3041–3056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson IC, Cairney JWG (2004) Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques. Environ Microbiol 8:769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson IC, Campbell CD, Prosser JI (2003) Diversity of fungi in organic soils under a moorland-Scotspine (Pinus sylvestris L.) gradient. Environ Microbiol 5:1121–1132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson D, Watson CA (2000) The beneficial rhizosphere: a dynamic entity. Appl Soil Ecol 15:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastias BA, Huang ZQ, Blumfield T, Xu ZH, Cairney JWG (2006) Influence of repeated prescribed burning on the soil fungal community in an eastern Australian wet sclerophyll forest. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3492–3501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bastias BA, Anderson IC, Xu ZH, Cairney JWG (2007) RNA- and DNA- based profiling of soil fungal communities in a native Australian eucalypt forest and adjacent Pinus elliotti plantation. Soil Biol Biochem 39:3108–3114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baudoin E, Benizri E, Guckert A (2003) Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1183–1192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brons JK, van Elsas JD (2008) Analysis of bacterial communities in soil by use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and clone libraries, as influenced by different reverse primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 9:2717–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahyani VR, Matsuya K, Asakawa S, Kimura M (2003) Succession and phylogenetic composition of bacterial communities responsible for the composting process of rice straw estimated by PCR-DGGE analysis. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49:619–630

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garbeva P, Veen JAV, Elsas JDV (2004) Microbial diversity in soil: selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:243–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia JAL, Barbas C, Probanza A (2001) Low molecular weight organic acids and fatty acids in root exudates of two Lupinus cultivars at flowering and fruiting stages. Phytochem Anal 12:305–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhiza and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MH, Haynes RJ (2005) Catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities under sugarcane and other land uses estimated by Biolog and substrate induced respiration methods. Appl Soil Ecol 29:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holford ICR (1997) Soil phosphorus: its measurement, and its uptake by plants. Aust J Soil Res 35:227–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DL (1998) Organic acids in the rhizosphere - a critical review. Plant Soil 205:25–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keerthisinghe G, Hocking PJ, Ryan PR, Delhaize E (1998) Effect of phosphorus supply on the formation and function of proteoid roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Cell Environ 21:467–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kielak A, Rodrigues JLM, Kuramae EE, Chain PSG, Van Veen JA, Kowalchuk GA (2010) Phylogenetic and metagenomic analysis of Verrucomicrobia in former agricultural grassland soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol71:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Larena I, Salazar O, González V, Julián MC, Rubio V (1999) Design of a primer for ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer with enhanced specificity for ascomycetes. J Biotechnol 75:187–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner P, Neumann G, Kania A (2002) Spatial and temporal dynamics of the microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of cluster roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Soil 246:167–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner P, Crowley D, Yang CH (2004) Development of specific rhizosphere bacterial communities in relation to plant species, nutrition and soil type. Plant Soil 261:199–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner P, Solaiman Z, Rengel Z (2006) Rhizosphere properties of Poaceae genotypes under P-limiting conditions. Plant Soil 283:11–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama T, Nakajima Y, Matsuya K (2007) Bacterial community in plant residues in a Japanese paddy field estimated by RFLP and DGGE analyses. Soil Biol Biochem 39:463–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes encoding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nazih N, Finlay-Moore O, Hartel PG, Fuhrmann JJ (2001) Whole soil fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of early soybean rhizosphere as affected by temperature and matric water potential. Soil Biol Biochem 33:693–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann G, Massonneau A, Mertinoia E, Römheld V (1999) Physiological adaptations to phosphorus deficiency during proteoid root development in white lupin. Planta 208:373–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan XW, Li WB, Zhang QY, Li YH, Liu MS (2008) Assessment on phosphorus efficiency characteristics of soybean genotypes in phosphorus-deficient soils. Agri Sci China 8:958–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghothama KG, Karthikeyan AS (2005) Phosphate acquisition. Plant Soil 274:37–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheokand S, Kumari A, Dayal J (2009) Genotypic variation in legumes for nutrient stress tolerance-a review. Crop Res 10:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Mukerji KG (2006) Root exudates as determinant of rhizospheric microbial biodiversity. In: Mukerji K, Manoharachary C, Singh J (eds) Microbial activity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biology, Volume 7. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 39-53

  • Singh BK, Munro S, Potts JM, Millard P (2007) Influence of grass species and soil type on rhizosphere microbial community structure in grassland soils. Appl Soil Ecol 36:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalla K, Wieland G, Buchner A, Zock A, Parzy J, Kaiser S, Roskot N, Heuer H, Berg G (2001) Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4742–4751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit E, Leeflang P, Gommans S (2001) Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2284–2291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soederberg KH, Olsson PA, Baath E (2002) Structure and activity of the bacterial community in the rhizosphere of different plant species and the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:223–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HY, Deng SP, Raun WR (2004) Bacterial community structure and diversity in a century-old manuretreated agroecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5868–5874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Jin J, Liu J, Chen X, Liu J, Liu X (2009a) Bacterial community structure in a Mollisol under long-term natural restoration, cropping and bare fallow history estimated by PCR-DGGE. Pedosphere 19:156–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Xu Y, Jin J, Liu J, Zhang Q, Liu X (2009b) Effect of soil type and soybean genotype on fungal community in soybean rhizosphere during reproductive growth stages. Plant Soil 317:135–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Luo C, Liao H, Yan X, Nian H (2003) Study on the response of soybean varieties to P deficiency. Soybean Sci 22:108–114 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Wang G, Jin J, Liu J, Zhang Q, Liu X (2009) Bacterial communities in soybean rhizosphere in response to soil type, soybean genotype, and their growth stage. Soil Biol Biochem 41:919–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Sekiguchi Y, Hanada S, Hugenholtz P, Kim H, Kamagata Y, Nakamura K (2003) Gemmatimonas aurantiaca gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-negative, aerobic, polyphosphate-accumulating micro-organism, the first cultured representative of the new bacterial phylum Gemmatimonadetes phyl. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1155–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tieduje JM (1996) DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:316–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Chinese Academy of Sciences for the Hundred Talents Program and National Natural Science Foundation of China (40541004), as well as National Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs of China (2009BADB3B06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanghua Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Wang, G., Jin, J. et al. Effects of different concentrations of phosphorus on microbial communities in soybean rhizosphere grown in two types of soils. Ann Microbiol 61, 525–534 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0168-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0168-3

Keywords

Navigation