Abstract
An aircraft engine is a system of systems with several degrees of complexity. It is important to perform the correct amount of maintenance at each individual maintenance event. A mathematical replacement model is used to ensure that the correct maintenance is performed. The reliability of the results from the mathematical replacement model will be improved if there is a better way to estimate the life length for on-condition engine parts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackert SP (2010) Basics of aircraft maintenance programs for financiers—evaluation & insights of commercial aircraft maintenance programs. http://www.scribd.com/doc/149666853/Basics-of-Aircraft-Maintenance-Programs-for-Financiers-v1#scribd. Accessed 15 June 2015
Ackoff RL (1971) Towards a system of systems concepts. Manag Sci 17:661–671
Ahmadi A, Söderholm P, Kumar U (2010) On aircraft scheduled maintenance program development. J Qual Maint 16:229–255. doi:10.1108/13552511011072899
Allison MA, Batdorf R, Chen H, Generazio H, Singh H, Tucker S (2004) The characteristics and emerging behaviors of system of systems. New England Complex Systems Institute, Boston, MA. http://necsi.edu/education/oneweek/winter05/NECSISoS.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2015
Almgren T, Andréasson N, Palmgren M, Patriksson M, Strömberg A-B, Wojciechowski A, Önnheim M (2012) Optimization models for improving periodic maintenance schedules by utilizing opportunities. In: Proceedings of the production and operations management world conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Andersson M (2011) Life tracking system (LTS) for RM12. In: Proceedings of the international society for airbreathing engines, ISABE 2011, Gothenburg, Sweden
Andréasson N (2004) Optimization of opportunistic replacement activities in deterministic and stochastic multi-component systems. Licentiate thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg University
Aragones JK, Eaker CE, Irving RR, Kornfein MM, Livingston ST, Ovington BT (2000) Method and system for planning repair of an aircraft engine. USA Patent US6067486 A
Ashby MJ, Byer RJ (2002) An approach for conducting a cost benefit analysis of aircraft engine prognostics and health management functions. In: Proceedings of the reliability and maintainability symposium (RAMS). IEEE, pp 2847–2856
Aviation Safety Council (2002) In-flight breakup over the Taiwan strait northeast of Makung, Penghu Island China airlines flight CI611 Boeing 747-200, B-18255 May 25, 2002 (Aviation Occurance Report Volume I ASC-AOR-05-02-001). Aviation Safety Council, Taipei
Backlund A (2000) The definition of system. Kybernetes 29:444–451
Crossley WA (2004) System of systems: an introduction of Purdue University schools of engineering’s signature area. In: Proceedings of the engineering systems symposium, Cambridge, MA
Dixon MC (2006) The maintenance costs of aging aircraft: insights from commercial aviation, vol 486. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica
EN 13306 (2001) European Committee for Standardization. Maintenance terminology CEN European Committee for Standardization. www.cenorm.com. Accessed 17 Sept 2015
Fornlöf V, Sandberg U, Syberfeldt A, Almgren T (2014) More reliable aircraft engine maintenance optimization by a classification framework for on-condition parts. In: Proceedings of the 6th Swedish production symposium, SPS14, Gothenburg, Sweden
Fornlöf V, Galar D, Syberfeldt A, Almgren T (2015) Aircraft engines: a maintenance trade-off in a complex system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on quality, reliability, infocom technology and business operations, New Delhi, India, 28–30 Dec 2015
Fornlöf V, Galar D, Syberfeldt A, Almgren T (2016) On-condition parts versus life limited parts: a trade off in aircraft engines. In: Proceedings of the international conference on reliability, safety and hazard advances in reliability, maintenance and safety, Luleå, Sweden, pp 253–262
Försvarmakten (2016) Rules for military aviation. http://www.forsvarsmakten.se/en/about/documents/rules-for-military-aviation/. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
Galar D, Kumar U, Villarejo R, Johansson C-A (2013) Hybrid prognosis for railway health assessment an information fusion approach for PHM deployment. In: Proceedings of the PHM2013: 2013 prognostic and system health management, Milan, Italy, September 8–11
Ghobbar AA, Friend CH (2003) Evaluation of forecasting methods for intermittent parts demand in the field of aviation: a predictive model. Comput Oper Res 30:2097–2114. doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(02)00125-9
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 13381 (2004) Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines prognostics. ISO. www.iso.org. Accessed 30 Oct 2015
Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:1483–1510
Keating C, Rogers R, Unal R, Dryer D et al (2003) System of systems engineering. Eng Manag J 15:36–45
Kleeman MP, Lamont GB (2005) Solving the aircraft engine maintenance scheduling problem using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. In: International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 782–796
Knotts RMH (1999) Civil aircraft maintenance and support Fault diagnosis from a business perspective. J Qual Maint Eng 5:335–348
Maillart LM (2006) Maintenance policies for systems with condition monitoring and obvious failures. IIE Trans 38:463–475
Mattila V, Virtanen K, Raivio T (2003) A simulation model for aircraft maintenance in an uncertain operational environment. In: Proceedings of 17th European simulation multiconference (ESM2003), Nottingham, England. pp 456–461
Mishra M, Saari J, Galar D, Leturiondo U (2014) Hybrid models for rotating machinery diagnosis and prognosis estimation of remaining useful life. Luleå tekniska universitet, Luleå
Nguyen PL, Goldman A, Graham PH, McCormick RI (1999) Maintenance and warranty control system for aircraft. USA Patent US6003808 A
NTSB (2003) Loss of control and impact with Pacific ocean, Alaska Airlines flight 261, McDonnell Douglas MD-83, N963AS, about 2.7 miles north of Anacapa Island, California, January 31, 2000 (Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-02/01). National Transportation Safety Board, Washigton, DC
Patriksson M, Almgren T, Andreasson N, Anevski D, Strömberg A-B, Svensson J (2007) Optimization of opportunistic replacement activities: a case study in the aircraft industry. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, Gothenburg
PeriyarSelvam U, Tamilselvan T, Thilakan S, Shanmugaraja M (2013) Analysis on costs for aircraft maintenance. Adv Aerosp Sci Appl 3:177–182
Rau C-G, Necas P, Boscoianu M (2011) Review of maintainability and maintenance optimization methods for aviation engineering systems. Sci Mil J 6:54–60
Reményi C, Staudacher S (2014) Systematic simulation based approach for the identification and implementation of a scheduling rule in the aircraft engine maintenance. Int J Prod Econ 147:94–107
Sinex B (2002) Aircraft maintenance tracking system. USA Patent US6418361 B2
SKYbrary (2015a) Aircraft Maintenance Manual. Eurocontrol. http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Aircraft_Maintenance_Manual. Accessed 22 Oct 2015
SKYbrary (2015b) Component Maintenance Manual. Eurocontrol. http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Component_Maintenance_Manual. Accessed 22 Oct 2015
Wu H, Liu Y, Ding Y, Liu J (2004) Methods to reduce direct maintenance costs for commercial aircraft. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 76:15–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fornlöf, V., Galar, D., Syberfeldt, A. et al. RUL estimation and maintenance optimization for aircraft engines: a system of system approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7, 450–461 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0509-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0509-0