Skip to main content
Log in

Pattern of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: a Single Institution Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical staging remains the standard primary treatment of endometrial cancer. Lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor which helps in deciding adjuvant treatment. Extensive lymphadenectomy is associated with increased incidence of morbidity. The role of lymphadenectomy in surgical staging is still controversial especially in early stage disease. The surgico-pathological pattern of 155 patients with apparently stage 1 cancer endometrium who had undergone pelvic alone or pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection and its correlation to the grade of the tumour, myometrial infiltration and presence of peritoneal disease and incidence of peri-operative morbidity are analysed and described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lutman CV et al (2006) Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology. Gynecol Oncol 102(1):92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan JK, Cheung MK, Huh WK, Osann K, Husain A, Teng NN, Kapp DS (2006) Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in Endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients. Cancer 107(8):1823–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benedetti Panici P et al (2008) Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(23):1707–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitchener H et al (2009) Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study. Lancet 373:125–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Orr JW Jr (1998) Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: does the patient benefit? Gynecol Oncol 71:335–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Gostout BS, Jones MB, Wilson TO, Podratz KC (2008) Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cliby WA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Dodge R, Kohler M, Rodriguez G et al (1995) Acute morbidity and mortality associated with selective pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the surgical staging of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Technol 1:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rungruang B, Olawaiye AB (2012) Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol 5(1):28–34

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. ASTEC study group, Kitchener H, Swart AM et al (2009) Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study. Lancet 373:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park JY, Kim EN, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH (2008) Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 108:486–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lago V, Martín B, Ballesteros E, Cárdenas-Rebollo JM, Minig L (2018) Tumor grade correlation between preoperative biopsy and final surgical specimen in endometrial cancer: the use of different diagnostic methods and analysis of associated factors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(7):1258–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Visser NCM, Reijnen C, Massuger LFAG, Nagtegaal ID, Bulten J, Pijnenborg JMA (2017) Accuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 130(4):803–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boronow RC, Morrow CP, Creasman WT, Disaia PJ, Silverberg SG, Miller A, Blessing JA (1984) Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 63(6):825–832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN et al (1987) Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 60:2035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dowdy SC et al (2008) Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy—a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111(3):418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim Y, Eoh KJ, Lee J et al (2020) Comparison of outcomes between the one-step and two-step sentinel lymph node mapping techniques in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30:318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Suchetha.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suchetha, S., Mathew, A.P., Rema, P. et al. Pattern of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: a Single Institution Experience. Indian J Surg Oncol 12, 73–77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01227-y

Keywords

Navigation