Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic Factors and Complete Edentulism in North Karnataka Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

Complete edentulism is the terminal outcome of a multifactorial process involving biological factors and patient related factors. Tooth loss associated with periodontal disease and caries has an apparent impact on an individual’s quality of life, and has been associated with lower levels of satisfaction with life and a lower morale. The rate of total edentulism is said to be increasing in developing countries and this had been attributed mainly to the high prevalence of periodontal diseases and caries. The distribution and prevelance of complete edentulism between developed and less developed countries may be associated with a complex interrelationship between cultural, individual, attitude, behavior, dental attendance, etiopathogenesis of edentulism, access to care and socioeconomic factors. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between socio-demographic factors and edentulism. In order to plan for future oral health care provisions for the society, collecting epidemiological data on oral health particularly related to prosthodontics and its related issues are very important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Academy of Prosthodontics (2005) Glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 94:10–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H et al (2005) The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ 83:661–669

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (2003) The world oral health report 2003. WHO Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marcenes W, Steele JG, Sheiham A, Walls AW (2003) The relationship between status, food selection, nutrient intake, nutritional status and body mass index in older people. Cad Saude Publica 19:809–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalk W, Van Rossum GMJM, Van Waas MAJ (1990) Edentulism and preventive goals in the treatment of mutilate dentition. Int Dent J 40:267–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah N, Prakash H, Sunderman KR (2004) Edentulism, denture wear and denture needs of Indian elderly: a community-based study. J Oral Rehabil 31:467–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouma J (1984) On becoming edentulous. An investigation into the dental and behavior reason for full mouth extraction. Thesis Ryksuniversteit te Grmingh

  8. Eklund SA, Burt BA (1994) Risk factor for total tooth loss in the United States: longitudinal analysis of national data. J Public Health Dent 51(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caplan DJ, Weintraub JA (1993) The oral health burden in the United States: a summary of recent epidemiologic studies. J Dent Educ 57(12):853–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brekhus PJ (1929) Dental disease and its relation to the loss of human teeth. JADA 16:2237–2247

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacGregor IDM (1972) Pattern of tooth loss in a selected population of Nigerians. Arch Oral Biol 17:1573–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma R (2012) Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic status scale: revision for 2011. Indian J Pediatr 79(7):961–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Okoisor FE (1977) Tooth mortality: a clinical study of causes of loss. Niger Med J 7:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaimenyi JT, Sachdera P, Patel S (1988) Causes of tooth mortality at the dental hospital unit of Kenyatta National Hospital of Nairobi, Kenya. J Odonto-stomatologie Tropicale 1:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoover JN, McDermott RE (1989) Edentulousness in patients attending a university dental clinic. J Can Dent Assoc 55(2):139–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suominen-Taipale AL, Alanen P, Helenius H, Nordblad A, Uutla A (1999) Edentulism among finish adults of working age. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 27(5):353–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Slade GD, Locker D, Leake JL, Wu AS, Dunkley G (1990) The oral health status and treatment needs of adults aged 65+ living independently in Ottawa-Carleton. Can J Public Health 81:114–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adler N, Boyce T, Chesney MA et al (1999) Socio-economic status and health: the challenge of gradient. Health Hum Rights 3:181–201

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hunter JM, Arbona ST (1995) The tooth as a marker of developing world quality of life: a field study in Guatemala. Soc Sci Med 41(9):1217–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dolan TA, Gilbert CH, Duncan RP (2001) Risk indicators of edentulism, partial both loss and prosthetic status among black and white middle-aged and older adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 29:329–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gordon WT, Phil SJK (1998) The impact of the demographics of aging and the edentulous condition on dental care services. J Prosthet Dent 79:56–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Nagaraj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagaraj, E., Mankani, N., Madalli, P. et al. Socioeconomic Factors and Complete Edentulism in North Karnataka Population. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14, 24–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0149-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0149-2

Keywords

Navigation