Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Following Through: The Consistency of Survivorship Care Plan Use in United States Cancer Programs

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine suggests that consistent survivorship care plan (SCP) use involves developing and delivering SCPs to all cancer survivors and their primary care providers (PCPs). We describe the consistency of SCP use in US cancer programs and assess its relationship with cancer-program-level determinants. We surveyed employees knowledgeable about survivorship practices in cancer programs reporting current SCP use (n = 36, 81 % response rate). We operationalized consistent SCP use as whether SCPs were (1) developed for ≥75 % survivors, (2) delivered to ≥75 % survivors, (3) delivered to ≥75 % PCPs, and (4) all of the above. We use descriptive statistics to report SCP use consistency and evaluate associations using Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. SCPs were developed for ≥75 % survivors in five programs (15 %), eight (25 %) delivered ≥75 % SCPs to survivors, seven (23 %) delivered ≥75 % SCPs to PCPs, and only one program (4 %) met all three criteria. We found relationships between SCP use consistency and geographic region (p = .05), initiating SCP use in response to survivors’ requests (p = .03), and membership in the National Cancer Institute’s National Community Cancer Centers Program (p = .01). SCP use is highly inconsistent. Survivors and cancer care quality improvement organizations may play a key role in improving the consistency of SCP use in US cancer programs. Survivors can initiate SCP use. Cancer care quality improvement organizations can specify how cancer programs’ compliance with SCP guidelines will be assessed. Future research should identify mechanisms underlying the relationships that we found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, Cooper D et al (2012) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62(4):220–241. doi:10.3322/caac.21149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark EJ, Stovall EL, Leigh S, Siu AL, Austin DK, Rowland JH (1996) Imperatives for quality cancer care: access, advocacy, action, and accountability. National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, Silver Spring, MD

    Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Medicine (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press

  4. Tierney WM, McKinley ED (2002) When the physician-researcher gets cancer: understanding cancer, its treatment, and quality of life from the patient's perspective. Med Care 40(6 Suppl):III20–III27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, Cook EF, Earle CC (2009) Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 27(15):2489–2495. doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.3232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Earle CC, Neville BA (2004) Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer 101(8):1712–1719. doi:10.1002/cncr.20560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Potosky AL, Han PK, Rowland JH, Klabunde CN, Smith T, Aziz N, Earle C, Ayanian JZ, Ganz PA, Stefanek M (2011) Differences between primary care physicians' and oncologists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med 26(12):1403–1410

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alfano CM, Rowland JH (2006) Recovery issues in cancer survivorship: a new challenge for supportive care. Cancer J 12(5):432–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Husson O, Holterhues C, Mols F, Nijsten T, van de Poll-Franse LV (2010) Melanoma survivors are dissatisfied with perceived information about their diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care. Br J Dermatol 163(4):879–881. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09895.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG (2005) Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns 57(3):342–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicolaije KAH, Husson O, Ezendam NPM, Vos MC, Kruitwagen RFPM, Lybeert MLM, and van de Poll-Franse LV (2012) Endometrial cancer survivors are unsatisfied with received information about diagnosis, treatment and follow-up: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry. Patient Educ Couns 88(3):427–435. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.002

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salz T, Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS, Layne TM, Bach PB (2012) Survivorship care plans in research and practice. CA Cancer J Clin 12(10):20142

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Risendal B, Jones A, Panzer S, Ganz PA, Syrjala KL et al (2011) Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv 5(4):358–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Birken SA, Deal AM, Mayer DK, and Weiner BJ (2013) Determinants of survivorship care plan use in United States cancer programs. J Cancer Educ

  15. Commission on Cancer (2013) CoC Membership. http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/cocmembership.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2013

  16. Association of Community Cancer Centers (2013) ACCC Member Cancer Programs. http://accc-cancer.org/membership_directory/. Accessed 23 Dec 2013

  17. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013) http://www.nccn.org/. Accessed 3 Jan 2013

  18. American College of Surgeons (2013) American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs. http://www.facs.org/cancerprogram/. Accessed 23 Dec 2013

  19. Dillman DA, Hoboken NJ (2009) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. 3rd edition.Wiley

  20. Weiner BJ, Lewis MA, Linnan LA (2009) Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Res 24(2):292–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gornick M (1977) Medicare patients: geographic differences in hospital discharge rates and multiple stays. Soc Secur Bull 40:22–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Graves EJ (1995) National Hospital Discharge Survey: annual summary. In Vital and health statistics. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services

  23. Pokras R, Kozak LJ, McCarthy E, and Graves EJ (1989) Trends in hospital utilization: United States, 1965–86. In Vital and health statistics. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services

  24. Welch WP, Welch HG, Miller ME, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE (1993) Geographic variation in expenditures for physicians’ services in the United States. N Eng J Med 328:621–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rural Health Research Center (2013) http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-about.php. Accessed 1 Sep 2013

  26. Jabson JM, Bowen DJ (2013) Cancer treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions: which cancer survivors receive them? Cancer Causes Control 24(5):861–871. doi:10.1007/s10552-013-0163-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eccles M, Armstrong D, Baker R, Cleary K, Davies H, Davies S, Glasziou P et al (2009) An implementation research agenda. Implement Sci 4(1):18

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheung WY, Aziz N, Noone A-M, Rowland JH, Potosky AL, Ayanian JZ, Virgo KS, Ganz PA, Stefanek M, Earle CC (2013) Physician preferences and attitudes regarding different models of cancer survivorship care: a comparison of primary care providers and oncologists. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):343–354. doi:10.1007/s11764-013-0281-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Parry C, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Rowland JH (2013) Can't see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning. J Clin Oncol 31(21):2651–2653. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.48.4618

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hewitt M, Bamundo A, Day R (2007) Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J Clin Oncol 25:2270–2273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Merport A, Lemon SC, Nyambose J, Prout MN (2012) The use of cancer treatment summaries and care plans among Massachusetts physicians. Support Care Cancer 20(7):1579–1583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1107A McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA

    Sarah A. Birken & Allison M. Deal

  2. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrington Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA

    Deborah K. Mayer

  3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA

    Bryan J. Weiner

Authors
  1. Sarah A. Birken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allison M. Deal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deborah K. Mayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bryan J. Weiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Birken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birken, S.A., Deal, A.M., Mayer, D.K. et al. Following Through: The Consistency of Survivorship Care Plan Use in United States Cancer Programs. J Canc Educ 29, 689–697 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0628-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0628-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation