Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Health Assessment of Wetland Ecosystems in the Heilongjiang River Basin, China

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from Landsat ETM+ images, meteorological records, digital elevation mode data and other statistical data were used to extract wetland-related information for the Heilongjiang River Basin, China, an area significantly affected by global climate change. Based on a pressure–state–response conceptual model, an integrated assessment index was constructed. The health status of the wetland ecosystem was assessed and mapped by an analytical hierarchy process and spatial analysis to integrate the regional characteristics. The health status of the wetlands was described as very healthy, healthy, sub-healthy, unhealthy or sick. This status decreased from the northeast and east to the west and southwest and was affected by the pressure–state–response characteristics. Most wetlands were healthy or very healthy and were mainly in the east, accounting for 35.95 % of the total area of wetland. Sub-healthy wetlands accounted for 18.69 % of the total area. Unhealthy and sick wetlands were mainly located to the west of the Greater Khingan Mountains and the Songnen Plain and accounted for 21.14 and 13.06 % of the total area, respectively. These wetlands were affected by higher pressures from human activity, their vulnerable state and severe land degradation. The protection and scientific management of these areas should be strengthened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breaux A, Cochrane S, Evens J et al (2005) Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 74:217–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch MJ, Parkes M, Zubrycki K et al (2014) Watershed management and public health: an exploration of the intersection of two fields as reported in the literature from 2000 to 2010. Environmental Management 54:240–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J Jr, Niederlehner BR (1995) Ecosystem health concepts as a management tool. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health 4(2):91–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YY (1995) Research on Wetlands in China. Jilin Science & Technology, Changchun, pp 22–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa M, Telmer KH, Evans T et al (2015) The lakes of the Pantanal: inventory, distribution, geochemistry, and surrounding landscape. Wetlands Ecology and Management 23:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui MH (2006) Status quo of wetlands of Heilongjiang river valley and the protection. Forest Inventory Planning 31:75–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui BS, Yang ZF (2001) Research review on wetland ecosystem health. Chinese Journal of Ecology 20(3):31–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui BS, Yang ZF (2002) Establishing an indicator system for ecosystem health evaluation on wetlands. Acta Ecologica Sinica 22:1231–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui BS, Yang ZF (2006) Wetlands. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing, pp 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein PR (2001) Climate change and emerging infectious diseases. Microbes and Infection 3:747–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrig L, Mernam G (1985) Habitat patches connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Xiao Y (2011) Characteristics of wetland plant resources and its protection and application in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 39:76–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson CM, Weinstein P (2008) Wetlands, health and sustainable development – global challenges and opportunities. In: Ounsted M and Madgwick J (eds), Healthy Wetlands, Healthy People: Report of the Shaoxing City Symposium, pp 23–42. Wetlands International, Wageningen, the Netherlands

  • Gong P, Niu ZG, Cheng X et al (2010) China’s wetland change (1990–2000) determined by remote sensing. Science China Earth Sciences 53:1036–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume P, Yves F, Gilles L et al (2013) Waterbird demography as indicator of wetland health: the French-wintering common snipe population. Biological Conservation 164:123–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Jiang CB, Yang C (2010) Health assessment of Yellow River Delta wetland. Journal of Yangtze River Science Research Institute 27:44–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Han M, Li YH, Li HT et al (2006) Health diagnosis for wetlands on coastal plain of Shouguang City. China Population Resource Environment 16(4):78–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz P, Finlayson CM (2011) Wetlands as settings: using ecosystem services and health impact assessment for wetland and water resource management. Bioscience 61:678–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz P, Finlayson CM, Weinstein P (2012) Healthy wetlands, healthy people. A review of wetlands and human health interactions. Ramsar Technical Report No. 6. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands/World Health Organisation. Gland, Switzerland.

  • Ishizaka A, Nemery P (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang WG, Li J, Li JH et al (2005) Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in the Liaohe River Delta. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25(3):408–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SQ, Lu YF (2014) A study on status and countermeasure of wetland protection and restoration in Heilongjiang Province. Environ Protection 42(8):24–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JP, Li BL, Zhang GK (2005) Quantitative analysis of the wetland distribution law and its influencing factors in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 33(5):65–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai SZ, Xu SJ, Pan YJ (2005) Application of the PSR model to the evaluation of wetland ecosystem health. Tropical Geography 25:317–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ et al (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2005) China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning JC, Liu GH, Liu QS et al (2012) Spatial discretization of hydrological response units and improved SWAT mode. Advance Water Science 23:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu ZG, Zhang HY, Wang XW et al (2012) Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chinese Science Bulletin 57:2813–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RH, Thomas MC (1999) What is river health? Freshwater Biology 41:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2004) OECD Environmental Indicators: Development Measurement and Use [2004-05-20]. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/47/ 24993546.pdf

  • Parkes MW, Morrison KE, Bunch MJ et al (2010) Towards integrated governance for water, health and social-ecological systems: the watershed governance prism. Global Environmental Change 20:693–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng YS, Fu P, Yang RD (2014) Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in the Caohai Lake of Guizhou Province. Earth Environment 42:68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter C, Melack JM, Engle D (2014) Modeling methane emissions from Amazon floodplain ecosystems. Wetlands 34:501–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ (1992) Evolution of indicators of ecosystem health. Ecological Indicators 1:121–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ (1999) Epidemiology and ecosystem health: natural bridges. Ecosystem Health 5:174–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2012) The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. International Series Operational Research Management Sciences 175:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer D, Herricks E, Kerster H (1988) Ecosystem health: measuring ecosystem health. Environmental Management 12:445–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapanian MA, Waite TA, Krzys G et al (2004) Rapid assessment indicator of wetland integrity as an unintended predictor of avian diversity. Hydrobiologia 520:119–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang NC (2009) Study on general situation and problems analysis associated with wetlands in Heilongjiang Province. Environ Science Management 4:93–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S (2014) Impacts and countermeasures of climate change on wetland ecohydrology – taking the Nenjiang River Basin wetland as an example. Ground Water 36:197–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JA, Zuo W (2010) Geographic Atlas of China. Sinomaps Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Wang KL, Xu LF (2003) The assessment indicators of wetland ecosystem health. Territory Natural Resource Study 4:63–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JA, Mao J, Jia HC (2008) On the spatiotemporal patterns of flood and drought hazards in China. Journal of Natural Disasters 1:115–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RF, Mitsch WJ (1996) Functional assessment of five wetlands constructed to mitigate wetland loss in Ohio, USA. Wetlands 16:436–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG (2007) Landscape Ecology – Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy, 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan HQ (1983) Chinese Marsh. Shandong Science & Technology Press, Jinan, pp 14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan HQ, Lin P, Lu JJ (1998) Research and Protection of Chinese Wetlands. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, pp 47–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XY (2013) Research on landscape pattern indices of landscape ecology. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Information 4:271

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YL (1997) Vegetation Geography in Northeast China. Science Press, Beijing, pp 138–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301593; 41471428), the Arid Meteorology Science Foundation, CMA (IAM201407) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2012CB955402). The authors thank all the people who helped with this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100094, China

    Huicong Jia & Wanchang Zhang

  2. China Meteorological Administration, Institute of Arid Meteorology, Lanzhou, 730020, China

    Huicong Jia

  3. National Disaster Reduction Center of China, Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, NO.6 Guangbaidong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100124, People’s Republic of China

    Donghua Pan

Authors
  1. Huicong Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donghua Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wanchang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghua Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, H., Pan, D. & Zhang, W. Health Assessment of Wetland Ecosystems in the Heilongjiang River Basin, China. Wetlands 35, 1185–1200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0705-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0705-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation