Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Support vector machine method, a new technique for lithology prediction in an Iranian heterogeneous carbonate reservoir using petrophysical well logs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lithology prediction is one of the most important issues in the petroleum geology and geological studies of petroleum engineering. Since well logging responses are very analogous for heterogeneous carbonate and evaporite sequences, a precisionist lithology prediction at predetermined depths becomes extremely critical. In this work, a combination of conventional petrophysical-based method and artificial intelligent approaches are used for lithological characterization of these layered reservoirs. Support vector machines (SVMs) are based on statistical learning theory and the principles of structural and empirical risk minimization use a non-heuristic analytical approach for prediction. SVM classification method is adopted for lithology prediction from petrophysical well logs based on core analysis data in an Iranian heterogeneous carbonate reservoir consisting of limestone, dolomite and anhydrite sequences. Normalization and attribute selection are conducted for data preparation purposes and the effect of kernel functions types on SVM performance is then investigated. Results show that SVM is a useful approach for lithology prediction and the radial basis function kernel is more accurate as compared to other kernel functions since it yields minimum misclassification rate error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b :

Bias constant

C :

Penalty parameter

e :

Exponent parameter of polynomial kernel

H :

Hessian matrix

k :

Kernel function

l :

Number of instances

L :

Lagrangian equation

X :

Input vector of attributes

y :

Output vector of class label

α, β :

Lagrangian multipliers

σ :

RBF parameter

ξ :

Slack variable

W :

Normal vector

Φ :

Mapping function from input space to feature space

d :

Dual

i, j :

Indices

n :

Input space dimension

s :

Optimal

p :

Primal

SV:

Support vectors

T :

Transpose

References

  • Alpaydin E (2010) Introduction to machine learning, 2nd edn. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Amari S-i, Wu S (1999) Improving support vector machine classifiers by modifying kernel functions. Neural Netw 12(6):783–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsaru M, Zhou B, Aizawa T, Karashima H, Hashimoto T (2006) Automated lithology prediction from PGNAA and other geophysical logs. Appl Radiat Isot 64(2):272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on computational learning theory, ACM, pp 144–152

  • Burbidge R, Trotter M, Buxton B, Holden S (2001) Drug design by machine learning: support vector machines for pharmaceutical data analysis. Comput Chem 26(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch JM, Fortney WG, Berry LN (1987) Determination of lithology from well logs by statistical analysis. SPE Form Eval 2(4):412–418. doi:10.2118/14301-pa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasquilla A, Silvab JD, Flexa R (2008) Associating fuzzy logic, neural networks and multivariable statistic methodologies in the automatic identification of oil reservoir lithologies through well logs. Revista de Geologia 21(1):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-C, Kopaska-Merkel DC, Chen H-C (2002) Identification of lithofacies using Kohonen self-organizing maps. Comput Geosci 28(2):223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkassky V, Mulier FM (2007) Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chikhi S, Batouche M (2005) Using probabilistic unsupervised neural method for lithofacies identification. Int Arab J Inf Technol 2(1):58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikhi S, Batouche M (2007) Hybrid neural network methods for lithology identification in the Algerian Sahara. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 4:774–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy SJ (2000) Litho-facies and permeability prediction from electrical logs using fuzzy logic. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 3(4):319–324. doi:10.2118/65411-pa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delfiner P, Peyret O, Serra O (1987) Automatic determination of lithology from well logs. SPE Form Eval 2(3):303–310. doi:10.2118/13290-pa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding S (2011) Spectral and wavelet-based feature selection with particle swarm optimization for hyperspectral classification. J Softw 6(7):1248–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis DV, Singer JM (2008) Well logging for Earth scientists. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford CM, Agah A (2010) Collaborative multi-agent rock facies classification from wireline well log data. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23(7):1158–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update, v3.6.9, 2013 edn. SIGKDD explorations, vol 11, issue 1

  • Hamel L (2009) Knowledge discovery with support vector machines. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hua S, Sun Z (2001) A novel method of protein secondary structure prediction with high segment overlap measure: support vector machine approach. J Mol Biol 308(2):397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta EB, Duval B, Hao J-K (2006) A hybrid GA/SVM approach for gene selection and classification of microarray data. In: Applications of evolutionary computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 34–44

  • Katz SA, Vernik L, Chilingar GV (1999) Prediction of porosity and lithology in siliciclastic sedimentary rock using cascade neural assemblies. J Pet Sci Eng 22(1):141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecman V (2005) Support vector machines—an introduction. In: Wang L (ed) Support vector machines: theory and applications, vol 177. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Springer: Berlin, pp 1–47. doi:10.1007/10984697_1

  • Lee Y, Lin Y, Wahba G (2004) Multicategory support vector machines: theory and application to the classification of microarray data and satellite radiance data. J Am Stat Assoc 99(465):67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J-S, Kang JM, Kim J (1999) Interwell log correlation using artificial intelligence approach and multivariate statistical analysis. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 20–22 April 1999

  • Mezghani D, Boujelbene S, Ellouze N (2010) Evaluation of SVM kernels and conventional machine learning algorithms for speaker identification. Int J Hybrid Inf Technol 3(3):23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Raeesi M, Moradzadeh A, Doulati Ardejani F, Rahimi M (2012) Classification and identification of hydrocarbon reservoir lithofacies and their heterogeneity using seismic attributes, logs data and artificial neural networks. J Pet Sci Eng 82:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravikumar B, Thukaram D, Khincha H (2008) Application of support vector machines for fault diagnosis in power transmission system. Gener Transm Distrib IET 2(1):119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rider M (2002) The geological interpretation of well logs, 2nd edn. Rider-French Consulting Ltd., Sutherland

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin C, Kim K, Park M, Kim H (2000) Support vector machine-based text detection in digital video. In: Neural networks for signal processing X, 2000. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop, 2000. IEEE, pp 634–641

  • Tang H (2009) Successful carbonate well log facies prediction using an artificial neural network method: Wafra Maastrichtian reservoir, partitioned neutral zone (PNZ), Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Tang H, White CD (2008) Multivariate statistical log log-facies classification on a shallow marine reservoir. J Pet Sci Eng 61(2):88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teh W, Willhite GP, Doveton J (2012) Improved reservoir characterization in the Ogallah field using petrophysical classifiers within electrofacies. In: SPE Improved oil recovery symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA

  • Wang Z, Sun X (2011) An efficient discriminant analysis algorithm for document classification. J Softw 6(7):1265–1272

    Google Scholar 

  • Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA (2011) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to thank Exploration Directorate of National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) for providing data to apply in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Sebtosheikh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sebtosheikh, M.A., Motafakkerfard, R., Riahi, M.A. et al. Support vector machine method, a new technique for lithology prediction in an Iranian heterogeneous carbonate reservoir using petrophysical well logs. Carbonates Evaporites 30, 59–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-014-0199-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-014-0199-0

Keywords

Navigation