Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Analysis of Lung Perfusion Scan and SPECT/CT for the Evaluation of Functional Lung Capacity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare lung perfusion scan with single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for the evaluation of lung function and to elucidate the most appropriate modality for the prediction of postoperative lung function in patients with lung cancer.

Methods

A total of 181 patients underwent Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin lung perfusion scan and SPECT/CT to examine the ratio of diseased lung and diseased lobe. Forty-one patients with lung cancer underwent both preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests within 1 month to predict postoperative pulmonary function. Predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppoFEV1) was calculated by the % radioactivity of lung perfusion scan and SPECT, and the % volume of the residual lung, assessed on CT.

Results

The ratios of diseased lung as seen on lung perfusion scan and SPECT showed significant correlation, but neither modality correlated with CT. The ratios of the diseased lung and diseased lobe based on CT were higher than the ratios based on either perfusion scan or SPECT, because CT overestimated the function of the diseased area. The lobar ratio of both upper lobes was lower based on the perfusion scan than on SPECT but was higher for both lower lobes. Actual postoperative FEV1 showed significant correlation with ppoFEV1 based on lung perfusion SPECT and perfusion scan.

Conclusions

We suggest SPECT/CT as the primary modality of choice for the assessment of the ratio of diseased lung area. Both perfusion scan and SPECT/CT can be used for the prediction of postoperative lung function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, Musk AW, Antico VF, Lovegrove FT, et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;139:902–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunn WF, Scanlon PD. Preoperative pulmonary function testing for patients with lung cancer. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Elsevier; 1993. p. 371–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu MT, Pan HB, Chiang AA, Hsu HK, Chang HC, Peng NJ, et al. Prediction of postoperative lung function in patients with lung cancer: comparison of quantitative CT with perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:667–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ladurie MLR, Ranson-Bitker B. Uncertainties in the expected value for forced expiratory volume in one second after surgery. Chest. 1986;90:222–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Imaeda T, Kanematsu M, Asada S, Seki M, Matsui E, Doi H, et al. Prediction of pulmonary function after resection of primary lung cancer. Utility of inhalation-perfusion SPECT imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 1995;20:792–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Piai D, Quagliatto R, Toro I, Neto CC, Etchbehere E, Camargo E. The use of SPECT in preoperative assessment of patients with lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2004;24:258–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker MD, Berkmen YM, Austin JHM, Mun IK, Romney BM, Rozenshtein A, et al. Lung volumes before and after lung volume reduction surgery: quantitative CT analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:1593–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M, Takenaka D, Matsumoto S, Yoshimura M, et al. Postoperative lung function in lung cancer patients: comparative analysis of predictive capability of MRI, CT, and SPECT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:400–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner RM. Standardization of spirometry: a summary of recommendations from the American Thoracic Society: the 1987 update. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:217–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Suga K, Kawakami Y, Zaki M, Yamashita T, Shimizu K, Matsunaga N. Clinical utility of co-registered respiratory-gated(99m)Tc-Technegas/MAA SPECT-CT images in the assessment of regional lung functional impairment in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1280–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suh M, Kang Y, Ha S, Kim Y, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, et al. Comparison of two different segmentation methods on planar lung perfusion scan with reference to quantitative value on SPECT/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;51:161–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker JA, Coleman RE, Grady E, Royal HD, Siegel BA, Stabin MG, et al. SNM practice guideline for lung scintigraphy 4.0. J Nucl Med Technol. 2012;40:57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Milic-Emili J, Henderson JA, Dolovich MB, Trop D, Kaneko K. Regional distribution of inspired gas in the lung. J Appl Physiol. 1966;21:749–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Verschakelen JA, Van Fraeyenhoven L, Laureys G, Demedts M, Baert AL. Differences in CT density between dependent and nondependent portions of the lung: influence of lung volume. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:713–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bajc M, Neilly JB, Miniati M, Schuemichen C, Meignan M, Jonson B. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1356–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2007;132:161S–77S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pierce RJ, Copland JM, Sharpe K, Barter CE. Preoperative risk evaluation for lung cancer resection: predicted postoperative product as a predictor of surgical mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150:947–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, Sugarbaker DJ. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection: importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest. 1994;105:753–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Win T, Groves AM, Ritchie AJ, Wells FC, Cafferty F, Laroche CM. The effect of lung resection on pulmonary function and exercise capacity in lung cancer patients. Respir Care. 2007;52:720–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of the Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center for their technical assistance and support.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Center (NCC-1810201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seok-Ki Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Hoon Young Suh, Sohyun Park, Hyun Gee Ryoo, Ji-Young Kim, Tae Sung Kim, Jong Mog Lee, Moon Soo Kim, Hee Chul Yang, and Seok-Ki Kim declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

The institutional review board of our institute approved this retrospective study (IRB No. 2019-0270-0001), and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suh, H.Y., Park, S., Ryoo, H.G. et al. Comparative Analysis of Lung Perfusion Scan and SPECT/CT for the Evaluation of Functional Lung Capacity. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53, 406–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00617-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00617-7

Keywords

Navigation