Abstract
In the era of personalized and genomic medicine, awareness of patients with rare diseases is increasing as new approaches to diagnosis and treatment are developed. This study examined perceived barriers experienced by families with rare diseases and explored possible differences between participants in Malaysia and California, USA. The study involved N = 108 participants recruited in genetics clinic appointments at the University of Malaya Medical Center and three sites in Southern California. Participants completed a survey involving multiple choice and Likert scale items pertaining to perceived barriers to access genetics-related healthcare. Results from this study provide evidence of similar perceived barriers, despite differences in the two populations. Participants selected the expansion of healthcare provider knowledge of rare diseases to be the most beneficial approach to overcome perceived barriers. In both locations, it was also noted that travel distance to clinic was not perceived as a large stress factor. Taking these observations together, a healthcare model with a central location of providers well-versed in medical genetics may be considered if further data support our findings. The data from this study support a need for improving healthcare provider knowledge of genetics. Future studies exploring how these perceived stress factors are impacting families as well as different methods of educating providers are suggested by findings from the study, as well as studies querying the opinions of those who are unable to access genetics services.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acheson LS, Stange KC, Zyzanski S (2005) Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians. Genet Med 7(7):501–508
Association of Professors of Human and Molecular Genetics (APHMG, 2018) Medical school core curriculum in genetics 2013. https://www.aphmg.org/about-aphmg. Accessed 4 November 2018
Benjamin C, Houghton C, Foo C, Edgar C, Mannion G, Birch J, Ellis I, Weber A (2015) A prospective cohort study assessing clinical referral management & workforce allocation within a UK regional medical genetics service. Eur J Hum Genet 23(8):996–1003
Bowdin S, Gilbert A, Bedoukian E, Carew C, Adam MP, Belmont J, Bernhardt B, Biesecker L, Bjornsson HT, Blitzer M, D’Alessandro LC (2016) Recommendations for the integration of genomics into clinical practice. Genet Med 18:1075–1084
Buchanan AH, Christianson CA, Himmel T, Powell KP, Agbaje A, Ginsburg GS, Henrich VC, Orlando LA (2015) Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance. J Genet Couns 24(1):179–188
Carroll JC, Rideout AL, Wilson BJ, Allanson JM, Blaine SM, Esplen MJ, Farrell SA, Graham GE, MacKenzie J, Meschino W, Miller F (2009) Genetic education for primary care providers improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence. Can Fam Physician 55(12):e92–e99
Cigna Medical Coverage Policy (Cigna). Whole Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing Coverage Policy. Retrieved August, 2017, from https://cignaforhcp.cigna.com/public/content/pdf/coveragePolicies/medical/mm_0519_coveragepositioncriteria_exome_genome_sequence.pdf
Delikurt T, Williamson GR, Anastasiadou V, Skirton H (2015) A systematic review of factors that act as barriers to patient referral to genetic services. Eur J Hum Genet 23(6):739–745
Duffner PK, Caggana M, Orsini JJ, Wenger DA, Patterson MC, Crosley CJ, Kurtzberg J, Arnold GL, Escolar ML, Adams DJ, Andriola MR (2009) Newborn screening for Krabbe disease: the New York state model. Pediatr Neurol 40(4):245–252
Fogel BL, Satya-Murti S, Cohen BH (2016) Clinical exome sequencing in neurologic disease. Neurology: Clin Pract 6(2):164–176
Genetic and rare diseases information center (GARD). (2016) Retrieved March, 2016, from https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/gard
Global Genes ™ (2017) Rare Diseases: Facts and Statistics https://globalgenes.org/rare-diseases-facts-statistics. Accessed 15 February 2017
Harvey EK, Fogel CE, Peyrot M, Christensen KD, Terry SF, McInerney JD (2007) Providers' knowledge of genetics: a survey of 5915 individuals and families with genetic conditions. Genet Med 9(5):259–267
Hennekam RC (2011) Care for patients with ultra-rare disorders. Eur J Med Genet 54(3):220–224
Hyland KM, Dasgupta S, Garber K, Gold JA, Toriello H, Weissbecker K, Waggoner D (2016) Medical school core curriculum in genetics 2013. Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics website. http://media.wix.com/ugd/3a7b87_7064376a9eb346cfa1b85bc2f137c48f.pdf.. Accessed 1 July 2018
Jabatan kebajikan masyarakat (JKM). Retrieved March, 2016, from http://www.jkm.simple.my/
Jenkins J, Blitzer M, Boehm K, Feetham S, Gettig E, Johnson A, Lapham EV, Patenaude AF, Reynolds PP, Guttmacher AE (2001) Recommendations of core competencies in genetics essential for all health professionals. Genet Med 3(2):155–159
Katsanis SH, Katsanis N (2013) Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics. Nat Rev Genet 14(6):415–426
Kemper AR, Trotter TL, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Kyler P, Feero WG, Howell RR (2010) A blueprint for maternal and child health primary care physician education in medical genetics and genomic medicine: recommendations of the United States secretary for health and human services advisory committee on heritable disorders in newborns and children. Genet Med 12(2):77–80
Klitzman R, Chung W, Marder K, Shanmugham A, Chin LJ, Stark M, Leu CS, Appelbaum PS (2013) Attitudes and practices among internists concerning genetic testing. J Genet Couns 22(1):90–100
Korf BR, Feldman G, Wiesner GL (2005) Report of Banbury summit meeting on training of physicians in medical genetics, October 20-22, 2004. Genet Med 7(6):433–438
Laedtke AL, O’Neill SM, Rubinstein WS, Vogel KJ (2012) Family physicians’ awareness and knowledge of the genetic information non-discrimination act (GINA). J Genet Couns 21(2):345–352
Laurino MY, Leppig KA, Abad PJ, Cham B, Chu YWY, Kejriwal S, Lee JMH, Sternen DL, Thompson JK, Burgess MJ, Chien S, Elackatt N, Lim JY, Sura T, Faradz S, Padilla C, Paz ECD, Nauphar D, Nguyen KN, Zayts O, Vu DC, Thong MK (2018) A report on ten Asia Pacific countries on current status and future directions of the genetic counseling profession: the establishment of the professional Society of Genetic Counselors in Asia. J Genet Couns 27(1):21–32
Lee JMH, Thong MK (2013) Genetic counseling services and development of training programs in Malaysia. J Genet Couns 22(6):911–916
Mainous AG III, Johnson SP, Chirina S, Baker R (2013) Academic family physicians’ perception of genetic testing and integration into practice. Fam Med 45(4):257–262
Mandl KD, Kohane IS (2016) Time for a patient-driven health information economy? N Engl J Med 374(3):205–208
Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA (2015) Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genetics in Medicine 17(3):169–176
Orphanet: an online rare disease and orphan drug data base. © INSERM 1997. Available on http://www.orpha.net. Accessed [August 2017]
Pan V, Yashar BM, Pothast R, Wicklund C (2016) Expanding the genetic counseling workforce: program directors' views on increasing the size of genetic counseling graduate programs. Genet Med 18:842–849
Perry CG, Maloney KA, Beitelshees AL, Jeng LJ, Ambulos NP, Shuldiner AR, Blitzer MG (2016) Educational innovations in clinical pharmacogenomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 99(6):582–584
Rahimzadeh V, Bartlett G (2014) Genetics and primary care: where are we headed? J Transl Med 12(1):238
Reiser C, LeRoy B, Grubs R, Walton C (2015) Report on an investigation into an entry level clinical doctorate for the genetic counseling profession and a survey of the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors. J Genet Couns 24(5):689–701
Salari K (2009) The dawning era of personalized medicine exposes a gap in medical education. PLoS Med 6(8):e1000138
Salm M, Abbate K, Appelbaum P, Ottman R, Chung W, Marder K, Leu CS, Alcalay R, Goldman J, Curtis AM, Leech C (2014) Use of genetic tests among neurologists and psychiatrists: knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and needs for training. J Genet Couns 23(2):156–163
Shafie AA, Chaiyakunapruk N, Supian A, Lim J, Zafra M, Hassali MAA (2016) State of rare disease management in Southeast Asia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 11(1):107
Shashi V, McConkie-Rosell A, Rosell B, Schoch K, Vellore K, McDonald M, Jiang YH, Xie P, Need A, Goldstein DB (2013) The utility of the traditional medical genetics diagnostic evaluation in the context of next-generation sequencing for undiagnosed genetic disorders. Genet Med 16(2):176–182
Shotelersuk V, Limwongse C, Mahasirimongkol S (2014) Genetics and genomics in Thailand: challenges and opportunities. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2(3):210–216
Skirton H, Lewis C, Kent A, Coviello DA (2010) Genetic education and the challenge of genomic medicine: development of core competences to support preparation of health professionals in Europe. Eur J Hum Genet 18(9):972–977
Taber KAJ, Dickinson BD, Wilson M (2014) The promise and challenges of next-generation genome sequencing for clinical care. JAMA Intern Med 174(2):275–280
UCLA Health. Accessed on August, 2017. https://www.uclahealth.org/Mattel/pediatric-genetics
U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml?src=bkmk. Accessed on August, 2017
Valencia CA, Husami A, Holle J, Johnson JA, Qian Y, Mathur A, Wei C, Indugula SR, Zou F, Meng H and Wang L (2015) Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of whole exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool: a pediatric center’s experience. Front Pediatr 3
Wetterstrand KA (2016) DNA sequencing costs: Data from the NHGRI genome sequencing program (GSP). Retrieved Jan 25, 2016, from www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts
Wilkes MS, Day FC, Fancher TL, McDermott H, Lehman E, Bell RA, Green MJ (2017) Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling. BMC Med Educ 17(1):163
World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory data. (2015) http://www.who.int/gho/health_financing/health_expenditure/en/ (accessed Sept 10th, 2018)
Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, Bainbridge MN, Willis A, Ward PA, Braxton A, Beuten J, Xia F, Niu Z, Hardison M (2013) Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med 369(16):1502–1511
Zayts O, Sarangi S, Thong MK, Chung BHY, Lo IFM, Kan ASY, Lee JMH, Padilla CD, Cutiongco-de la Paz EM, Faradz SM, Wasant P (2013) Genetic counseling/consultation in South-East Asia: a report from the workshop at the 10th Asia Pacific conference on human genetics. J Genet Couns 22(6):917–924
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the translators for converting the documents and responses. We also thank the following genetic counselors and physicians who allowed us to recruit participants at their clinics: Dr. Premala Muthukumarasamy and Ms. Rifhan Azwani Mazlan at UMMC; Dr. Natalie Gallant, Dr. Valerie Watiker, Kathryn Singh, and Katherine Hall at LBMMC; Dr. Maureen Bocian, Dr. Virginia Kimonis, Dr. June Anne Gold, and Meredith Jones at UCI and CHOC. We would also like to thank the participants and their families who completed the surveys. This research was conducted in order to fulfill a master’s degree requirement at the University of California Irvine School of Medicine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human studies and informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 101 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, E., Thong, MK., Flodman, P. et al. A comparative study of patients’ perceptions of genetic and genomic medicine services in California and Malaysia. J Community Genet 10, 351–361 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0399-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0399-8