Abstract
Geothermal energy is being widely exploited as a clean and renewable energy resource, and accurate assessments of potential resources can help us make reasonable planning and utilization of them. The volumetric method has been widely used in assessing geothermal resources owing to its simplicity and convenience. However, this method does not take into account the uncertainties of the input parameters involved, instead assigning a series of specific parameter values for each reservoir. Here, a Monte Carlo simulation approach was used to reduce these uncertainties while applying the volumetric method to estimate the geothermal resources of Bohai Bay Basin in eastern China. The basin contains two main types of thermal reservoirs: sandstone and carbonate. In applying Monte Carlo analysis to these reservoirs, the triangular and uniform distribution models for input parameters were used, and simulations were run with 1000–5000 iterations. Results indicate capacities of (1.182–2.283) × 1021 J (most likely 1.74 × 1021 J) and (1.299–2.546) × 1021 J (most likely 1.937 × 1021 J) for the Minghuazhen and Guantao sandstone reservoirs, respectively, and a capacity of (0.608–1.254) × 1021 J (most likely 8.450 × 1020 J) for the carbonate reservoir, finally, a range value (3.466–5.553) × 1021 J (most likely 4.400× 1021 J) for the whole Bohai Bay Basin.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkan S (2003) Assessment of low temperature geothermal resources. Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Turkey
Chang J, Qiu NS, Zhao XZ, Xu W, Qiu XU, Jin FM, Han CY, Xue M, Dong XY, Liang XJ (2016) Present-day geothermal regime of the Jizhong depression in Bohai Bay basin, East China. Chin J Geophys 59(3):1003–1016
Chen MX (1988) Geothermics of North China. Science Press, Beijng
Cheng YS, Chen SL (2009) Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Paleozoic Strata in Peripheral Areas of Nanpu Sag. Nat Gas Geosci 20(1):108–112
Davies JH (2013) Global map of solid Earth surface heat flow. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14(10):4608–4622
Feng ST, Yong XU, Yang XC (2013) Geothermal characters of deep karst thermal reserve in Shandong Province. Shandong Land Resour 29(9):16–23
Furlong KP, Chapman DS (2013) Heat flow, heat generation, and the thermal state of the lithosphere. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 41(1):385–410
Guo GX (2008) Assessment of the Hofsstadir geothermal field, W-Iceland, by Lumped parameter modelling, Monte Carlo Simulation and tracer test analysis, Geothermal Training Programme, Iceland, pp 247–279
Han Z, Cui YJ, Wang SF, Lin P, Sun Y (2015) Geothermal resource assessment based on Monte–Carlo method—a case study of geothermal field in Xiong County of Hebei Province. Urban Geol 10(4):58–62
Hreinsson EB (2007) Environmental, technical, economics and policy issues of the master plan for the renewable hydro and geothermal energy resources in Iceland, Universities Power Engineering Conference, International, pp 726–731
Hu SB, He LJ, Wang JY (2000) Heat flow in the continental area of China: a new data set. Earth Planet Sci Lett 179(2):407–419
Jiang GZ, Gao P, Rao S, Zhang LY, Tang XY, Huang F, Zhao P, Pang ZH, He LJHuSB (2016a) Compilation of heat flow data in the continental area of Chin a(4(th) edition). Chin J Geophys 59(8):2892–2910
Jiang GZ, Tang XY, Rao S, Gao P, Zhang LY, Zhao P, Hu SB (2016b) High-quality heat flow determination from the crystalline basement of the south-east margin of North China Craton. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 118:1–10
Li WW, Song R, Tang XY, Jiang GZ, Hu SB, Kong YL, Pang JM, Wang JC (2014) Borehole temperature logging and temperature field in the Xiongxian geothermal field, Hebei Province. Chin J Geol 49(3):850–863
Li ZX, Zuo YH, Qiu NS, Gao J (2017) Meso-Cenozoic lithospheric thermal structure in the Bohai Bay Basin, eastern North China Craton. Geosci Front 8(5):977–987
Liang HB, Qian Z, Xin SL, Zhao KJ (2010) Assessment and development of geothermal resources in Jizhong depression. China Petrol Explor 5:63–69
Lin WJ, Liu ZM, Wang WL, Wang GL (2013) The assessment of geothermal resources potential of China. Geol China 40(1):312–321
Liu QY (2016) Tectonic thermal modeling of the Bohai Bay Basin since the Cenozoic. Institute of Geology and Geophysics. Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing
Ma FR, Lin L, Wang YP, Zhao SM (2006) Discussion on the sustainable exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources in Tianjin. Geol Surv Res 34(122):247–263
Muffler LJP, Christiansen RL (1978) Geothermal resource assessment of the United States. Pure Appl Geophys 117(1–2):160–171
Qi JF, Yu FS, Lu KZ, Zhou JX, Wang ZY, Yang Q (2003) Conspectus on Mesozoic Basin in Bohai Bay province. Earth Sci Front 10(5):1–8
Qiu NS, Wei XU, Zuo YH, Jian C, Liu CL (2017) Evolution of Meso-Cenozoic thermal structure and thermal-rheological structure of the lithosphere in the Bohai Bay Basin, eastern North China Craton. Earth Sci Front 51(5):794–804
Quinao JJD, Zarrouk SJ (2018) Geothermal resource assessment using experimental design and response surface methods: the Ngatamariki Geothermal Field, New Zealand. Renewab Energy 116:324–334
Shah M, Vaidya D, Sircar A (2018) Using Monte Carlo simulation to estimate geothermal resource in Dholera geothermal field, Gujarat, India. Multiscale Multidisc Model Exp Design 1:1–13
Supriyadi, Srigutomo W, Munandar A (2014) Application analysis of Monte Carlo to estimate the capacity of geothermal resources in Lawu Mount, International Conference on Mathematics and Natural Sciences, pp 108–111
Tan ZR, Kang FX (2018) Geothermal energy potential analysis of karst reservoir in Linqing depression of Shandong Province. Geol Surv China 5(1):10–15
Wang K, Li CH, Lei HY (2003) The sustainable development and utilization of geothermal resources in Tianjin, China. Volcanol Miner Resour 24(1):7–13
Wang JY, Shengbiao HU, Pang Z, Li HE, Zhao P, Zhu CQ, Rao S, Tang XY, Kong Y, Luo L (2012) Estimate of geothermal resources potential for hot dry rock in the continental area of China. Sci Technol Rev 30(32):25–31
Wang ZT, Jiang GZ, Zhang C, Hu J, Shi YZ, Wang YB, Hu SB (2019) Thermal regime of the lithosphere and geothermal potential in Xiong’an New Area. Energy Explor Exploit 37(2):787–810
Wu XN, Li GJ, Tian JQ, Han CY (2011) Characteristics of inner buried hill carbonate reservoirs and their main controlling factors in the Jizhong depression. Special Oil Gas Reserv 18(2):22–25
Yan SQ, Liu GY, Meng QF, Zhang J, Yun-Li LI (2001) Geothermal resource characteristics and its exploitation future in Dezhou City. Geol Shandong 17(2):48–52
Yang FT, Liu SL, Liu JX, Pang ZH, Zhou DK (2015) Combined Monte Carlo simulation and geological modeling for geothermal resource assessment: a case study of the Xiongxian Geothermal Field, China, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Australia, pp 1–8
Ying ZL (2015) The characteristics and evaluation of geothermal resources in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. China University of Geosciences, Beijing
Zhang JT (2014) Tectonic activity difference and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of volcanic rock reservoir in eastern and western sags of Liaohe Depression. Geoscience 28(5):1032–1040
Zhao N, Wang GH, Jiang GS, Wang P (2016) Geochemical characteristics and occurrence environment of geothermal water in Dongli Lake area, Tianjin, China. Contrib Geol Miner Resour Res 31(1):142–146
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0604302), the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2017ZX05008-004) and China Geological Survey: Geothermal Clean Energy Survey and Evaluation in Xiong’an New Area (DD20189114, JYYWF20181101).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Jiang, G., Zhang, C. et al. Estimating geothermal resources in Bohai Bay Basin, eastern China, using Monte Carlo simulation. Environ Earth Sci 78, 355 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8352-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8352-7