Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Application of sediment rating curves to evaluate efficiency of EPM and MPSIAC using RS and GIS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Erosion potential method (EPM) and Modified Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee (MPSIAC) are two empirical models for estimating soil erosion and sediment delivery. These models use a relatively simple formulation, but they are still applied in various areas with different environmental conditions. However, evaluation of their efficiency is challenging. Accordingly, the main purpose of this study is investigating the performance of EPM and MPSIAC in estimating soil erosion and sediment yield using sediment rating curve (SRC) methods. Talar watershed in Iran was selected as the study area and suspended sediment load (SSL) of two Shirgah–Talar and Valikbon stations were used to assess the output of the models. Remote sensing and geographic information system were utilized in implementing the models. The estimated sediment yield values by the models were evaluated using the results of least square error regression and quantile regression (QR) SRC methods. Then, sediment yield values were obtained from 20-year discharge data (1992–2011). Despite the high uncertainty of QR results, the annual sediment delivery values of the models were achieved in an acceptable range. The most likely (with a probability of 0.5) average annual SSL values were between 713 × 103 and 840 × 103 ton for Shirgah–Talar station. Those values for Valikbon station were between 3142 × 101 and 3702 × 101. Moreover, the estimated average sediment yield in Shirgah–Talar station using MPSIAC and EPM were 591392 and 514054 ton/year, respectively. Those values for Valikbon station were 51881 and 27449 ton/year. Then, the results proved the better performance of MPSIAC in estimating SSL in the study area compared with EPM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asselman N (2000) Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves. J Hydrol 234:228–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherzadeh A, Daneshvar MRM (2011) Sediment yield assessment by EPM and PSIAC models using GIS data in semi-arid region. Front Earth Sci China 5:207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherzadeh A, Daneshvar MRM (2013) Evaluation of sediment yield and soil loss by the MPSIAC model using GIS at Golestan watershed, northeast of Iran. Arab J Geosci 6:3349–3362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsma E (1974) Soil erosion sequences on aerial photographs. ITC J 3:342–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Green K (2008) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davino C, Furno M, Vistocco D (2013) Quantile regression: theory and applications. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vente J, Poesen J (2005) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Earth Sci Rev 71:95–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragičević N, Karleuša B, Ožanić N (2016) A review of the Gavrilović method (erosion potential method) application. Građevinar Časopis Hrvatskog Saveza Građevinskih Inženjera 68:715–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan EH, Erpul G, Bayramin I (2007) Use of USLE/GIS methodology for predicting soil loss in a semiarid agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 131:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9464-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanetti D, Vezzoli L (2007) Sediment input and evolution of lacustrine deltas: the Breggia and Greggio rivers case study (Lake Como, Italy). Quat Int 173:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, Lane LJ (1987) User requirements: USDA, water erosion prediction project (WEPP) Draft 6.3. NSERL report (USA)

  • Garg V, Jothiprakash V (2012) Sediment yield assessment of a large basin using PSIAC approach in GIS environment. Water Resour Manag 26:799–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilovic Z (1988) Use of an empirical method (erosion potential method) for calculating sediment production and transportation in unstudied or torrential streams. In: International conference on river regime. Hydraulics Research Limited, Wallingford, Oxon UK (1988), pp 411–422, 5 figures, 4 tables, 8 references

  • Gavrilovic Z, Stefanovic M, Milovanovic I, Cotric J, Milojevic M (2008) Torrent classification—base of rational management of erosive regions. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012039

  • Gavrilović S (1972) Inženjering o bujičnim tokovima i eroziji. Izgradnja

  • Globevnik L, Holjevic D, Petkovsek G, Rubinic J (2003) Applicability of the Gavrilovic method in erosion calculation using spatial data manipulation techniques. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, London, pp 224–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C, Gebhardt K (1982) Predicting sediment yields from sagebrush rangelands [Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee prediction procedure, southwest Idaho]. Agric Rev Manuals

  • Jones R, Keech M (1966) Identifying and assessing problem areas in soil erosion surveys using aerial photographs. Photogram Rec 5:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby M et al (2003) Pan-European soil erosion risk assessment. The PESERA Map, Version 1

  • Koenker R (2012) quantreg: quantile regression. R package version 4.98. http://CRAN-R-project.org/package=quantreg. Accessed 10 Aug 2012

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre AM (1805) Nouvelles méthodes pour la détermination des orbites des comètes, vol 1. F. Didot

  • Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J (2014) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Markose VJ, Jayappa K (2016) Soil loss estimation and prioritization of sub-watersheds of Kali River basin, Karnataka, India, using RUSLE and GIS. Environ Monit Assess 188:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Moreno C, Duque M, Francisco J, Ibarra N, Manuel J, Hernando Rodríguez N, Sanz Santos M, Sánchez Castillo L (2013) Effects of topography and surface soil cover on erosion for mining reclamation: the experimental spoil heap at El Machorro mine (Central Spain). Land Degrad Dev 27:145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrit (2006) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan KM, Nalepa R (1982) Application of aerial photographic and computer analysis to the USLE for areawide erosion studies. J Soil Water Conserv 37:347–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Nearing M (2016) Handbook of erosion modelling. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R, Quinton J, Smith R, Govers G, Poesen J, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen M (1998) The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. ESPL 23:527–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndomba PM (2013) Validation of PSIAC model for sediment yields estimation in ungauged catchments of Tanzania. Int J Geosci 4:1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori H, Siadatmousavi SM, Mojaradi B (2016) Assessment of sediment yield using RS and GIS at two sub-basins of Dez Watershed, Iran. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 4:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific South-west Inter-Agency Committee (1968) PSIAC-Report of the Water Management Subcommittee on factors affecting sediment yield in the Pacific Southwest area and selection and evaluation of measures for reduction of erosion and sediment yield. ASCE 98:HY12

    Google Scholar 

  • Panahi MR, Mousavi SM, Rahimzadegan M (2017) Delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing, GIS, and AHP technique in Tehran–Karaj plain, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 76:792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7126-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyrowan HR, Jafari MS (2013) Presentation of a comprehensive method for determining erodibility rate of rock units with a review on Iranian geology. Watershed Eng Manag 5:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies G, McCool D, Yoder D (1997a) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), vol 703. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA et al (1997b) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 703

  • Rikimaru A, Roy P, Miyatake S (2002) Tropical forest cover density mapping. Trop Ecol 43:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau J-T, Chen T-J (2015) Quantile regression-based probabilistic estimation scheme for daily and annual suspended sediment loads. Water Resour Manag 29:2805–2818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens P, MacMillan J, Daigle J, Cihlar J (1985) Estimating universal soil loss equation factor values with aerial photography. J Soil Water Conserv 40:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q, Xu Y, Bennett SJ, Li Y (2015) Assessment of soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS: a case study of the Yangou watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 73:1715–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangestani MH (2006) Comparison of EPM and PSIAC models in GIS for erosion and sediment yield assessment in a semi-arid environment: Afzar Catchment, Fars Province, Iran. J Asian Earth Sci 27:585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrieling A (2006) Satellite remote sensing for water erosion assessment: a review. Catena 65:2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling D (1974) Suspended sediment and solute yields from a small catchment prior to urbanization. Fluv Process Instrum Watersheds 6:169–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Resources, Faculty of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Valiasr Street, Mirdamad Cross, Tehran, 1996715433, Iran

    Mohammad Saeid Mirakhorlo & Majid Rahimzadegan

Authors
  1. Mohammad Saeid Mirakhorlo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Majid Rahimzadegan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Rahimzadegan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirakhorlo, M.S., Rahimzadegan, M. Application of sediment rating curves to evaluate efficiency of EPM and MPSIAC using RS and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 77, 723 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7908-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7908-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation