Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Drainage network extraction and morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS mapping techniques (Lesser Zab River Basin, Iraq and Iran)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Lesser Zab River, in the northeast of Iraq and northwest of Iran, is the largest tributary inside Iraq supplying water to the Tigris River. The majority of the basin lies inside Iraq. The important goals of this study are to estimate the erodibility and flash flood hazard of the Lesser Zab River Basin (LZRB). The present research highlights sub-basins that should be prioritized for conservation and flood risk schemes. The morphometric analysis reveals that the most important sub-basins are Sb1 and Sb2, in terms of water contribution to the main river. They are characterized by higher stream order, larger area, high elevation, low drainage density, low drainage texture, and low relative relief. Because of the relatively high relief in the upper part of the LZRB, the sub-basins are characterized by low drainage density, which indicates more surface runoff compared to the main basin in the lower part. The very fine drainage texture in the upper part of the LZRB reflects low infiltration and higher runoff relative to the lower part. The sub-basins in the upper part of the LZRB, which have a low bifurcation ratio, produce flood hydrographs with marked discharge peaks, while the sub-basins in the lower part, which have high ratios, produce low peaks over a long time period. Various morphometric parameters have been used for each sub-basin to calculate compound parameters for the final ranking of the sub-basins. Based on utilization of morphometric parameters for the erodibility hazard assessment, sub-basins were divided into seven prioritization classes: critical, very high to critical, high to very high, medium to high, low to medium, very low to low, and lowest. Furthermore, the resultant hazard map indicates that 18 sub-basins have moderate to low risk of flash flooding and 29 sub-basins have low possibility of flash flooding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi M (1994) Tectonics of Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations. Tectonophysics 229:221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M (2004) Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold thrust belt of Iran and its pro-foreland evolution. Am J Sci 304:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander D (1993) Natural disasters. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mammar A, Al-Saady, Younus I, Al-Saati R (2011) ERBIL and MAHABAD quadrangles sheet NJ - 38 14 & NJ - 38 -15 (GEM 5&6). Series of geomorphological maps of Iraq, Scale 1:250 000. GEOSURV. Iraq, Baghdad

  • Al-Saady YI, Merkel B, Al-Tawash B, Al-Suhail Q (2015) Land use and land cover (LULC) mapping and change detection in the Little Zab River Basin (LZRB), Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq and NW Iran. FOG Freib Online Geosci 43:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Altaf F, Meraj G, Romshoo SA (2013) Morphometric analysis to infer hydrological behavior of Lidder Watershed, Western Himalaya, India. Geogr J 2013:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babar M (2005) Hydrogeomorphology: fundamentals, applications and techniques. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai V (1999) Prioritisation of subwatersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin: a remote sensing and GIS approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 27:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorley R, Malm D, Pogorzelski H (1957) New standard for estimating drainage basin shape. Am J Sci 255:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das D (2014) Identification of erosion prone areas by morphometric analysis using GIS. Art Prof Interests 95:61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J (2010) Hypsometric tools script

  • De Vivo B, Belkin HE, Lima A (2008) Environmental geochemistry: site characterization, data analysis and case histories. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 429

  • Deju R (1971) Regional hydrology fundamentals. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodov B, Foufoula-Georgiou E (2006) Floodplain morphometry extraction from a high resolution digital elevation model: a simple algorithm for regional analysis studies. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 3:410–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornkamp J, King C (1971) Numerical analyses in geomorphology: an introduction. New York: St Martin

  • Dowling T, Richardson D, O’Sullivan A, Summerell G, Walker J (1998) Application of the hypsometric integral and other terrain based metrices as indicators of the catchment health: a preliminary analysis. CSIRO Land and Water, Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Shamy I (1992) New approach for hydrological assessment of hydrographic basins of recent recharge and flooding possibilities. In: 10th symposium quaternary and development, Egypt, Mansoura Univ., 18 April

  • Ewen J, Parkin G, O’Connell P (2010) SHETRAN: distributed river basin flow and transport modeling system. J Hydrol Eng 10:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Faniran A (1968) The index of drainage intensity: a provisional new drainage factor. Aust J Sci 31:328–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Forzieri G, Gardenti M, Caparrini F, Hashim M (2008) A methodology for the pre-selection of suitable sites for surface and underground small dams in arid areas: a case study in the region of Kidal, Mali. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 33:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad S (2012) Tectonic map of Iraq scales 1: 1000000, 3rd edn. GEOSURV, Baghdad

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenken K (2009) Irrigation in the Middle East region in figures AQUASTAT survey-2008. In: Water reports, food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO)

  • Gajbhiye S, Mishra S, Pandey A (2014) Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: an RS and GIS perspective. Appl Water Sci 4:51–61

  • Goudie A (2006) Encyclopedia of geomorphology: a-I, vol 1. Routledge-Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelius H (1914) Flusskunde. Goschensche Verlagshandlung, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajam R, Hamid A, Bhat S (2013) Application of morphometric analysis for geo- hydrological studies using geo-spatial technology: a case study of Vishav Drainage Basin. Int Res J Geol Min (IRJGM) 4:136–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson J, McLoughlin S, Cox M (2007) Drainage patterns in southeast Queensland: the key to concealed geological structures? Aust J Earth Sci 54:1137–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (1932) Drainage-basin characteristics. Am Geophys Union Trans 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard A (1990) Role of hypsometry and planform in basin hydrologic response. Hydrol Process 4:373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggett R, Cheesman J (2002) Topography and the Environment. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale V, Gupta A (2001) Introduction to geomorphology. Orient Longman, Telangana

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliraj S, Chandrasekar N, Magesh NS (2014) Morphometric analysis of the River Thamirabarani sub-basin in Kanyakumari District, South west coast of Tamil Nadu, India, using remote sensing and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 73:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanth T, Hassan Z (2012) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of watersheds for soil and water resource management in Wular catchment using geo-spatial tools. Int J Geol Earth Environ Sci 2:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller E, Pinter N (2002) Active tectonics: earthquakes, uplift, and landscape. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby M (1987) Modelling some influences of soil erosion, landslides and valley gradient on drainage density and hollow development. Catena Suppl 10:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krenkel P (2012) Water quality management. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenkel P, Novotny V (1980) Water quality management. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein W (1947) Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. US Geological Survey, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchisheva A (1950) Practical Hydrology. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad. (In Russian)

  • Lykoudi E, Angelaki M (2004) Contribution of the morphometric parameters of an hydrographic network to the investigation of the neotectonic activity : an application to the upper Acheloos River. Bull Greek Geol Soc XXXVI:1084–1092

  • Magesh N, Jitheshlal K, Chandrasekar N, Jini K (2013) Geographical information system based morphometric analysis of Bharathapuzha river basin, Kerala, India. Appl Water Sci 3:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martz W, Garbrecht J (1992) Numerical definition of drainage network and sub catchment areas from digital elevation models. Comput Geosci 18:747–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoud M (2013) The possible impact of the prevailing physiographic features of se- lected catchments upon their hydrological characteristics, Egypt (Comparative study). Aust J Basic Appl Sci 7:324–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa L (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucumán, Argentina). Environ Geol 50:1235–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller V (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the clinch mountain area. Department of Geology, Columbia University, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghimi E, Yamani M, Maghsodi M, Aevazi J, Salari M (2013) The analysis of the form of the channel and its geomorphological evidence of changes fundamentally and functionally (case study: Zab River, between Mirabad to Brisu). Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 13:589–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe J, Wicander R (2014) The changing earth: exploring geology and evolution. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore I, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • More R (1967) Hydrological models and geography, in Models in geography. In: Chorley RJ, Haggett P (eds) Models in geography. Methuen, London, pp 145–185

  • Morisawa M (1962) Quantitative geomorphology of some watersheds in the appalachian plateau. Geol Soc Am Bull 73:1025–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphey J, Wallace D, Lane L (1977) Geomorphic parameters predict hydrograph characteristics in the southwest. Water Resour Bull 13:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oguchi T (1997) Drainage density and relative relief in humid steep mountains with frequent slope failure. Earth Surf Process Landf 22:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman A, Gloaguen R (2013a) Automatic extraction and size distribution of landslides in Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq. Remote Sens 5:2389–2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman A, Gloaguen R (2013b) River courses affected by landslides and implications for hazard assessment: a high resolution remote sensing case study in NE Iraq–W Iran. Remote Sens 5:1024–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman A, Gloaguen R (2014) Improving lithological mapping by SVM classification of spectral and morphological features: the discovery of a new chromite body in the Mawat Ophiolite Complex (Kurdistan, NE Iraq). Remote Sens 6:6867–6896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareta K, Pareta U (2012) Quantitative geomorphological analysis of a watershed of Ravi River Basin, H. P. India. Int J Remote Sens GIS 1:41–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton P, Baker V (1976) Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls. Water Resour Res 12:941–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike R, Wilson S (1971) Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral, and geomorphic area altitude analysis. Bull Geol Soc Am 82:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter K, Faulkner E (1987) Catchment response time as a predictor of flood quantiles1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 23:857–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad G (2008) Environmental geomorphology. Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghunath H (2006) Hydrology: principles, analysis and design. New Age International, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman S, Ajeez S, Aruchamy S, Jegankumar R (2015) Prioritization of sub watershed based on morphometric characteristics using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and geographical information system: a study of Kallar Watershed, Tamil Nadu. Aquat Procedia 4:1322–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RA, Sharma TC (1976) Quantitative analysis of drainage basin characteristics. J Soil Water Conserv India 26:18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnam K, Srivastava Y, Rao V, Amminedu E, Murthy K (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekha V, George A, Rita M (2011) Morphometric analysis and micro-watershed prioritization of peruvanthanam sub-watershed, the manimala river basin, Kerala, South India. Environ Res Eng Manag 3:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard K, Keppel R (1967) Hydrographs of Ephemeral Streams in the Southwest. J Hydraul Div 93:275–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley J, DeGloria D, Elliot R (1999) A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermt J Sci 5:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter D, Kochel R, Miller J (2006) Process geomorphology. Waveland Press, Long Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidegger A (1970) Stochastic models in hydrology. Water Resour Res 6:750–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67:597–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S, Hadley R (1961) Progress in the application of landform analysis in studies of semiarid. US Geological Survey, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyhan E (1976) Calculation of runoff from basin physiography (crbp). Geografish Instituut Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh O, Sarangi A (2008) Hypsometric analysis of the lesser Himalayan watersheds using geographical infor-mation system. Indian J Soil Cons 36(3):148–154

  • Singh S, Singh M (1997) Morphometric analysis of Kanhar River Basin. Natl Geogr J India 43:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248(9):655668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topology. Geol Soc Am Bull 63:1117–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Am Geophys Union Trans 38:912–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 439–476

  • Teixeira J, Chaminé HI, Carvalho JM, Pérez-Alberti A, Rocha F (2013) Hydrogeomorphological mapping as a tool in groundwater exploration. J Maps 9(2):263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira J, Chaminé HI, Espinha Marques J, Carvalho JM, Pereira AJ, Carvalho MR, Fonseca PE, Pérez-Alberti A, Rocha F (2015) A comprehensive analysis of groundwater resources using GIS and multicriteria tools (Caldas da Cavaca, Central Portugal): environmental issues. Environ Earth Sci 73(6):2699–2715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J, Joseph S, Thrivikramji K, Abe G, Kannan N (2012) Morphometrical analysis of two tropical mountain river basins of contrasting environmental settings, the southern Western Ghats, India. Environ Earth Sci 66:2353–2366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker G, Bras R (1998) Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology. Water Resour Res 34:2751–2764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren R (2010) An experimental test of well-described vegetation patterns across slope aspects using woodland herb transplants and manipulated abiotic drivers. New Phytol 185:1038–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willgoose G, Hancock G (1998) Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport-limited catchment. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:611–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood W, Snell J (1960) A quantitative system for classifying landforms. US Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering Center, Natick

  • Handbook of applied hydrology. 3976, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

  • Yang M, Lee K (2001) Determination of probability distributions for Strahler stream lengths based on Poisson process and DEM. Hydrol Sci J 46(5):813824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanina M, Angillieri E (2008) Morphometric analysis of Colangüil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan, Argentina. Environ Geol 55:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef A, Pradhan B, Gaber A, Buchroithner M (2009) Geomorphological hazard analysis along the Egyptian red sea coast between Safaga and Quseir. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:751–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavoianu I (1978) Morphometry of hydrographic Basins. Editura Academiei, Bucharest

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavoianu I (1985) Morphometry of drainage basins (developments in water science). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Iraq (MoHESR), and the TU Bergakademie Freiberg. We are grateful to the Geological Survey of Iraq for providing the necessary data and support during the field work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

    Younus I. Al-Saady & Balsam S. Al-Tawash

  2. Iraq Geological Survey, Al-Andalus Square, Baghdad, 10068, Iraq

    Younus I. Al-Saady & Arsalan A. Othman

  3. Department of Geology, College of Science, University of Basra, Basrah, Iraq

    Qusay A. Al-Suhail

  4. Remote Sensing Group, Institute of Geology, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, B.-von-Cotta-St., 2, 09596, Freiberg, Germany

    Arsalan A. Othman

  5. Exploration Division, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology, Halsbrueckerstr. 34, 09599, Freiberg, Germany

    Arsalan A. Othman

Authors
  1. Younus I. Al-Saady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qusay A. Al-Suhail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Balsam S. Al-Tawash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arsalan A. Othman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arsalan A. Othman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 9528 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Saady, Y.I., Al-Suhail, Q.A., Al-Tawash, B.S. et al. Drainage network extraction and morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS mapping techniques (Lesser Zab River Basin, Iraq and Iran). Environ Earth Sci 75, 1243 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6038-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6038-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation