Abstract
A debris flow is a solid–liquid two-phase flow; the composition and gradation of the particles within have a significant influence on its impact force. This paper proposes a new method for studying the impact force according to the composition of a debris flow based on analysis of existing calculation methods. The impact force is divided into three parts: (1) the dynamic pressure provided by the debris flow slurry, which is composed of fine particles and water; (2) the impact force of coarse particles; and (3) the impact force of boulders. This paper analyzes the established formulations used to calculate the impact force by using hydrodynamic theory and contact mechanics to propose a debris flow impact model according to the debris flow type. The results show that the impact force is closely related to the solid volume fraction, composition of particle materials, motion velocity, and depth of a debris flow. Among all the components of the impact force, the boulder impact force is the largest followed by the impact force of coarse particles; the dynamic pressure is minimal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews EW, Giannakopoulos AE, Plisson E, Suresh S (2002) Analysis of the impact of a sharp indenter. Int J solid struct 39(2):281–295
Armanini A (1997) On the dynamic impact of debris flows. In: Armanini A, Masanori M (eds) Recent developments on debris flows, lecture notes in earth sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 208–226
Armanini A, Scotton P (1992) Experimental analysis on the dynamic impact of a debris flow on structures. In: Internationales symposion interpraevent 1992, vol 6, Bern, pp 107–111
Braccesi C, Landi L (2007) A general elastic–plastic approach to impact analisys for stress state limit evaluation in ball screw bearings return system. Int J Impact Eng 34:1272–1285
Bugnion L, McArdell BW, Bartelt P, Wendeler C (2012) Measurements of hillslope debris flow impact pressure on obstacles. Landslides 9:179–187
Canelli L, Ferrero AM, Migliazza M, Segalin A (2012) Debris flow risk mitigation by the means of rigid and flexible barriers—experimental tests and impact analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1693–1699
Egli T (2000) Objektschutz gegen gravitative Naturgefahren. Mensurat Photogramm Genie Rural 98(3):120–125
Eidsvig UMK, Papathoma-Köhle M, Du J, Glade T, Vangelsten BV (2014) Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment. Eng Geol 181:15–26
Hazizan MA, Cantwell WJ (2002) The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures. Compos Part B: Eng 33(3):193–204
He SM, Li XP, Wu Y (2007) Calculation of impact force of outrunner blocks in debris flow considering elasto-plastic deformation. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 26(8):1664–1669 (In Chinese)
Hu KH, Wei FQ, Li Y (2011) Real-time measurement and preliminary analysis of debris-flow impact force at Jiangjia Ravine, China. Earth Surf Process Landf 36:1268–1278
Huang HP, Yang KC, Lai SW (2007) Impact force of debris flow on filter dam. Geophys Res Abstr 9:03218
Hübl J, Holzinger G (2003) Entwicklung von Grundlagen zur Dimensionierung kronenoffener Bauwerke fudie Geschiebebewirtschaftung in Wildba hen: Kleinmasssta liche Modellversuche zur Wirkung von Murbrechern. WLS Report 50 Band 3, Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering
Hübl J, Suda J, Proske D, Kaitna R, Scheidl C (2009) Debris flow impact estimation. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on water management and hydraulic engineering, 1 September, Ohtid, Macedonia
Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris flow torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Can Geotech J 21:663–677
Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296. doi:10.1029/97RG00426
Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J Geophys Res 106(B1):357–552
Iverson RM, George DL (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis. Proc R Soc A 470:20130819
Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Berti M (2010) The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large scale experiments. J Geophys Res 115:F03005. doi:10.1029/2009JF001514
Iverson RM, Reid ME, Logan M, LaHuse RG, Godt JW, Griswold JP (2011) Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment. Nat Geosci 4:116–121
Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics [M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kuwabara G, Kono K (1987) Restitution coefficient in a collision between two spheres. Jpn J appl phys 26(8R):1230
Kwan JSH (2012) Supplementary technical guidance on design of rigid debris-resisting barriers [A], GEO Report No. 270
Lichtenhahn C (1973) Die Berechnung von Sperren in Beton und Eisenbeton. Kolloquium uber Wildbachsperren, Mitteilungen der Forstlichen Bundesanstalt Wien 102:91–127
Luna BQ, Remaître A, Van Asch TW, Malet JP, Van Westen CJ (2012) Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment. Eng Geol 128:63–75
Mizuyama T (1979) Computational method and some considerations on impulsive force of debris flow acting on sabo dams. J Apan Soc Eros Control Eng 112:40–43 (in Japanese)
Mizuyama T (2008) Structural countermeasures for debris flow disasters. Int J Eros Control Eng 1(2):38–43
Moriguchi S, Borja RI, Ashima A, Sawada K (2009) Estimating the impact force generated by granular flow on a rigid obstruction, Acta Geotechnica 4:84. doi:10.1007/s11440-009-0084-5
Ouyang C, He S, Tang C (2014) Numerical analysis of dynamics of debris flow over erodible beds in Wenchuan earthquake-induced area. Eng Geol
Scheidl C, Chiari M, Kaitna R, Mu¨llegger M, Krawtschuk A, Zimmermann T, Proske D (2013) Analysing debris flow impact models, based on a small scale modelling approach. Surv Geophys 34:121–140
Scotton P, Deganutti A (1997) Phreatic line and dynamic impact in laboratory debris flow experiments. In: Chen C (ed) Proceedings of the 1st. international conference on debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 777–786
Shieh CL, Ting CH, Pan HW (2008) Impulsive force of debris flow on a curved dam. Int J Sedim Res 23(2):149–158
Suwa H, Okuda S (1983) Deposition of debris flows on a fan surface, Mt. Yakedake, Japan. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie NF Supplementband 46:79–101
Tang C, van Asch TWJ, Chang M, Chen GQ, Zhao XH, Huang XC (2012) Catastrophic debris flows on 13 August 2010 in the Qingping area, southwestern China: the combined effects of a strong earthquake and subsequent rainstorms. Geomorphology 139–140:559–576
Thornton C (1997) Coefficient of restitution for collinear collisions of elastic—perfectly plastic spheres. J Appl Mech 64:383–386
Vu-Quoc L, Zhang X, Lesburg L (2001) Normaland tangential force-displacement relation for frictional elasto-plastic contact of spheres. Int J Solids Struct 38:6455–6489
Wang DP, He SM, Ouyang CJ, Zhang XX (2013) Study of dynamic response of shed reinforced concrete slab to impact load of rock-fall [J]. Rock Soil Mech 34(2):881–886 (in Chinese)
Watanabe M, Ike (1981) Investigation and analysis of volcanic mud flows on mount sakurajima, japan. In: Erosion sediment transport measurement. Int Assoc Hydrol Florence Sci Publ 133:245–25
Wendeler C, McArdell BW, Rickenmann D, Volkwein A, Roth A, Denk M (2006) Field testing and numerical modelling of flexible debris flow barriers. Proc Int Conf Phys Model Geotech, Hong Kong
Zhang S (1993) A comprehensive approach to the observation and prevention of debris flow in China. Nat Hazards 7:1–23
Acknowledgments
This research has received financial support from the NSFC (Grant No. 41272346), the STS project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (project No. KFJ-EW-STS-094) and The Research Rlan of Shaanxi Provincial Transport Department.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, S., Liu, W. & Li, X. Prediction of impact force of debris flows based on distribution and size of particles. Environ Earth Sci 75, 298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5180-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5180-2