Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of impact force of debris flows based on distribution and size of particles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A debris flow is a solid–liquid two-phase flow; the composition and gradation of the particles within have a significant influence on its impact force. This paper proposes a new method for studying the impact force according to the composition of a debris flow based on analysis of existing calculation methods. The impact force is divided into three parts: (1) the dynamic pressure provided by the debris flow slurry, which is composed of fine particles and water; (2) the impact force of coarse particles; and (3) the impact force of boulders. This paper analyzes the established formulations used to calculate the impact force by using hydrodynamic theory and contact mechanics to propose a debris flow impact model according to the debris flow type. The results show that the impact force is closely related to the solid volume fraction, composition of particle materials, motion velocity, and depth of a debris flow. Among all the components of the impact force, the boulder impact force is the largest followed by the impact force of coarse particles; the dynamic pressure is minimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews EW, Giannakopoulos AE, Plisson E, Suresh S (2002) Analysis of the impact of a sharp indenter. Int J solid struct 39(2):281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armanini A (1997) On the dynamic impact of debris flows. In: Armanini A, Masanori M (eds) Recent developments on debris flows, lecture notes in earth sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 208–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Armanini A, Scotton P (1992) Experimental analysis on the dynamic impact of a debris flow on structures. In: Internationales symposion interpraevent 1992, vol 6, Bern, pp 107–111

  • Braccesi C, Landi L (2007) A general elastic–plastic approach to impact analisys for stress state limit evaluation in ball screw bearings return system. Int J Impact Eng 34:1272–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugnion L, McArdell BW, Bartelt P, Wendeler C (2012) Measurements of hillslope debris flow impact pressure on obstacles. Landslides 9:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canelli L, Ferrero AM, Migliazza M, Segalin A (2012) Debris flow risk mitigation by the means of rigid and flexible barriers—experimental tests and impact analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1693–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egli T (2000) Objektschutz gegen gravitative Naturgefahren. Mensurat Photogramm Genie Rural 98(3):120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidsvig UMK, Papathoma-Köhle M, Du J, Glade T, Vangelsten BV (2014) Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment. Eng Geol 181:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazizan MA, Cantwell WJ (2002) The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures. Compos Part B: Eng 33(3):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He SM, Li XP, Wu Y (2007) Calculation of impact force of outrunner blocks in debris flow considering elasto-plastic deformation. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 26(8):1664–1669 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu KH, Wei FQ, Li Y (2011) Real-time measurement and preliminary analysis of debris-flow impact force at Jiangjia Ravine, China. Earth Surf Process Landf 36:1268–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HP, Yang KC, Lai SW (2007) Impact force of debris flow on filter dam. Geophys Res Abstr 9:03218

  • Hübl J, Holzinger G (2003) Entwicklung von Grundlagen zur Dimensionierung kronenoffener Bauwerke fudie Geschiebebewirtschaftung in Wildba hen: Kleinmasssta liche Modellversuche zur Wirkung von Murbrechern. WLS Report 50 Band 3, Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering

  • Hübl J, Suda J, Proske D, Kaitna R, Scheidl C (2009) Debris flow impact estimation. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on water management and hydraulic engineering, 1 September, Ohtid, Macedonia

  • Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris flow torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Can Geotech J 21:663–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296. doi:10.1029/97RG00426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J Geophys Res 106(B1):357–552

  • Iverson RM, George DL (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis. Proc R Soc A 470:20130819

  • Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Berti M (2010) The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large scale experiments. J Geophys Res 115:F03005. doi:10.1029/2009JF001514

  • Iverson RM, Reid ME, Logan M, LaHuse RG, Godt JW, Griswold JP (2011) Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment. Nat Geosci 4:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics [M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwabara G, Kono K (1987) Restitution coefficient in a collision between two spheres. Jpn J appl phys 26(8R):1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan JSH (2012) Supplementary technical guidance on design of rigid debris-resisting barriers [A], GEO Report No. 270

  • Lichtenhahn C (1973) Die Berechnung von Sperren in Beton und Eisenbeton. Kolloquium uber Wildbachsperren, Mitteilungen der Forstlichen Bundesanstalt Wien 102:91–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna BQ, Remaître A, Van Asch TW, Malet JP, Van Westen CJ (2012) Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment. Eng Geol 128:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuyama T (1979) Computational method and some considerations on impulsive force of debris flow acting on sabo dams. J Apan Soc Eros Control Eng 112:40–43 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuyama T (2008) Structural countermeasures for debris flow disasters. Int J Eros Control Eng 1(2):38–43

  • Moriguchi S, Borja RI, Ashima A, Sawada K (2009) Estimating the impact force generated by granular flow on a rigid obstruction, Acta Geotechnica 4:84. doi:10.1007/s11440-009-0084-5

  • Ouyang C, He S, Tang C (2014) Numerical analysis of dynamics of debris flow over erodible beds in Wenchuan earthquake-induced area. Eng Geol

  • Scheidl C, Chiari M, Kaitna R, Mu¨llegger M, Krawtschuk A, Zimmermann T, Proske D (2013) Analysing debris flow impact models, based on a small scale modelling approach. Surv Geophys 34:121–140

  • Scotton P, Deganutti A (1997) Phreatic line and dynamic impact in laboratory debris flow experiments. In: Chen C (ed) Proceedings of the 1st. international conference on debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 777–786

  • Shieh CL, Ting CH, Pan HW (2008) Impulsive force of debris flow on a curved dam. Int J Sedim Res 23(2):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa H, Okuda S (1983) Deposition of debris flows on a fan surface, Mt. Yakedake, Japan. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie NF Supplementband 46:79–101

  • Tang C, van Asch TWJ, Chang M, Chen GQ, Zhao XH, Huang XC (2012) Catastrophic debris flows on 13 August 2010 in the Qingping area, southwestern China: the combined effects of a strong earthquake and subsequent rainstorms. Geomorphology 139–140:559–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton C (1997) Coefficient of restitution for collinear collisions of elastic—perfectly plastic spheres. J Appl Mech 64:383–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu-Quoc L, Zhang X, Lesburg L (2001) Normaland tangential force-displacement relation for frictional elasto-plastic contact of spheres. Int J Solids Struct 38:6455–6489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang DP, He SM, Ouyang CJ, Zhang XX (2013) Study of dynamic response of shed reinforced concrete slab to impact load of rock-fall [J]. Rock Soil Mech 34(2):881–886 (in Chinese)

  • Watanabe M, Ike (1981) Investigation and analysis of volcanic mud flows on mount sakurajima, japan. In: Erosion sediment transport measurement. Int Assoc Hydrol Florence Sci Publ 133:245–25

  • Wendeler C, McArdell BW, Rickenmann D, Volkwein A, Roth A, Denk M (2006) Field testing and numerical modelling of flexible debris flow barriers. Proc Int Conf Phys Model Geotech, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S (1993) A comprehensive approach to the observation and prevention of debris flow in China. Nat Hazards 7:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has received financial support from the NSFC (Grant No. 41272346), the STS project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (project No. KFJ-EW-STS-094) and The Research Rlan of Shaanxi Provincial Transport Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, S., Liu, W. & Li, X. Prediction of impact force of debris flows based on distribution and size of particles. Environ Earth Sci 75, 298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5180-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5180-2

Keywords

Navigation