Abstract
Preferential flow and solute transport are common processes in the unsaturated soil, in which distributions of soil water content and solute concentrations are often characterized as fractal patterns. An active region model (ARM) was recently proposed to describe the preferential flow and transport patterns. In this study, ARM governing equations were derived to model the preferential soil water flow and solute transport processes. To evaluate the ARM equations, dye infiltration experiments were conducted, in which distributions of soil water content and Cl− concentration were measured. Predicted results using the ARM and the mobile–immobile region model (MIM) were compared with the measured distributions of soil water content and Cl− concentration. Although both the ARM and the MIM are two-region models, they are fundamentally different in terms of treatments of the flow region. The models were evaluated based on the modeling efficiency (ME). The MIM provided relatively poor prediction results of the preferential flow and transport with negative ME values or positive ME values less than 0.4. On the contrary, predicted distributions of soil water content and Cl− concentration using the ARM agreed reasonably well with the experimental data, with ME values higher than 0.8. The results indicated that the ARM successfully captured the macroscopic behavior of preferential flow and solute transport in the unsaturated soil.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basile A, Coppola A, De Mascellis R, Randazzo L (2006) Scaling approach to deduce field unsaturated hydraulic properties and behavior from laboratory measurements on small cores. Vadose Zone J 5:1005–1016
Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) (2004) Methods of soil analysis, Part 4 Physical methods. Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI
de Vos JA, Raats PAC, Feddes RA (2002) Chloride transport in a recently reclaimed Dutch polder. J Hydrol 257:59–77
Flury M, Flühler H (1994) Brilliant Blue FCF as a dye tracer for solute transport studies: a toxicological overview. J Environ Qual 23:1108–1112
Flury M, Flühler H (1995) Tracer characteristics of Brilliant Blue FCF. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:22–27
Flury M, Wai NN (2003) Dyes as tracers for vadose zone hydrology. Rev Geophys 41(1):1002. doi:10.1029/2001RG000109
Flury M, Flühler H, Jury WA, Leuenberger J (1994) Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: a field study. Water Resour Res 30:1945–1954
Forrer I, Parrita A, Kasteel R, Flühler H, Luca D (2000) Quantifying dye tracers in soil profiles by image processing. Eur J Soil Sci 51:313–322
Gardner WH (1986) Water content. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, Physical and mineralogical methods. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 493–544
Gjettermann B, Nielsen KL, Petersen CT, Jensen HE, Hansen S (1997) Preferential flow in sandy loam soils as affected by irrigation intensity. Soil Technol 11:139–152
Glass RJ (1993) Modeling gravity-driven fingering using modified percolation theory. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual international conference on high level radioactive waste conference, Las Vegas, Nevada
Goulding KWT, Poulton PR, Webster CP, Howe MT (2000) Nitrate leaching from the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment, Rothamsted, UK, as influenced by fertiliser and manure inputs and the weather. Soil Use Manage 16:244–250
Heppell CM, Burt TP, Williams RJ, Johnson AC (2000) A laboratory investigation of the release of a conservative tracer and herbicide from topsoil aggregates under varying rainfall intensities. Soil Use Manage 16:175–182
Jarvis SC (2000) Progress in studies of nitrate leaching from grassland soils. Soil Use Manage 16:152–156
Kasteel R, Vogel HJ, Roth K (2002) Effect of non-linear adsorption on the transport behavior of Brilliant Blue in a field soil. Eur J Soil Sci 53:231–240
Ketelsen H, Meyer-Windel S (1999) Adsorption of brilliant blue FCF by soils. Geoderma 90:131–145
Klute A (1986) Water retention: laboratory methods. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1 physical and mineralogical methods. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 635–662
Larsson MH, Jarvis NJ, Torstensson G, Kasteel R (1999) Quantifying the impact of preferential flow on solute transport to tile drains in a sandy field soil. J Hydrol 215:116–134
Lipsius K, Mooney SJ (2006) Using image analysis of tracer staining to examine the infiltration patterns in a water repellent contaminated sandy soil. Geoderma 136:865–875
Liu H, Doughty C, Bodvarsson GS (1998) An active fracture model for unsaturated flow and transport in fractured rocks. Water Resour Res 34:2633–2646
Liu H, Zhang G, Bodvarsson GS (2003) The active fracture model: its relation to fractal flow patterns and an evaluation using field observations. Vadose Zone J 2:59–269
Liu H, Zhang R, Bodvarsson GS (2005) An active region model for capturing fractal flow patterns in unsaturated soils: Model development. J Contam Hydrol 80:18–30
Loague K, Green RE (1991) Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol 7:51–73
Morris C, Mooney SJ (2004) A high-resolution system for the quantification of preferential flow in undisturbed soil using observations of tracers. Geoderma 118:133–143
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JE (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1-A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290
Öhrström P, Persson M, Albergel J, Zante P, Nasri S, Berndtsson R, Olsson J (2002) Field-scale variation of preferential flow as indicated from dye coverage. J Hydrol 257:164–173
Öhrström P, Hamed Y, Persson M, Berndtsson R (2004) Characterizing unsaturated solute transport by simultaneous use of dye and bromide. J Hydrol 289:23–35
Persson M, Yasuda H, Albergel H, Berndtsson R, Zante P, Nasri S, Öhrström P (2001) Modeling plot scale dye penetration by a diffusion limited aggregation (DLA) model. J Hydrol 250:98–105
Quisenberry VL, Phillips RE, Zeleznik JM (1994) Spatial distribution of water and chloride macropore flow in a well structured soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1294–1300
Reichenberger S, Amelung W, Laabs V, Pinto A, Totsche KU, Zech W (2002) Pesticide displacement along preferential flow pathways in a Brazilian Oxisol. Geoderma 110:63–86
Rhoades JD (1982) Soluble salts. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 167–179
Sheng F, Wang K, Zhang R, Liu H (2009) Characterizing soil preferential flow using iodine–starch staining experiments and the active region model. J Hydrol 367:115–124
Šimůnek J, Vogel T, van Genuchten MT (1994) The SWMS_2D code for simulating water flow and solute transport in two-dimensional variably saturated media. Version 1.21, Research Report No. 132, US Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA
Šimůnek J, Jarvis NJ, van Genuchten MT, Gardenas A (2003) Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone. J Hydrol 272:14–35
Smith JE, Zhang ZF (2001) Determining effective interfacial tension and predicting finger spacing for DNAPL penetration into water-saturated porous media. J Contam Hydrol 48:167–183
van Dam JC, Wosten JHM, Nemes A (1996) Unsaturated soil water movement in hysteretic and water repellent field soils. J Hydrol 184:153–173
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898
van Genuchten MT, Wierenga PJ (1976) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media. I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:473–481
Wang K, Zhang R, Yasuda H (2006) Characterizing heterogeneity of soil water flow by dye infiltration experiments. J Hydrol 328:559–571
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported in part by grants of the National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 50779080, 50528910 and 50579079) and the 973 Project, the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2006CB403404).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Derivation of the governing equation for water flow
Figure 1 schematically shows the vertical water flow occurring in a rectangular soil unit volume. Because the horizontally averaged soil water content is used in the ARM (Liu et al. 2005; Sheng et al. 2009), it is assumed that the soil water flows in the z-direction only. According to the mass conservation principle, we obtain the water conservation equation for the system during an arbitrary small time period Δt between t and t + Δt as
Here V in is the water volume flowing into the soil volume during Δt; V out is the water volume flowing out from the soil volume during Δt; V inc is the increase of the water volume stored in the soil volume during Δt; V sk is the water volume extracted (e.g., plant root, positive) or supplied (e.g., irrigation, negative) from other processes during Δt.
For the one-dimensional vertical flow, the water volume flowing into the soil volume during Δt can be expressed as
where q a (flow per unit area per unit time) is the water flux within the active region in the z-direction (upward positive).
Similarly, the water volume flowing out from the soil volume during Δt is expressed as
The increase of the water volume stored in the soil volume during Δt is expressed by
where θ i is the soil water content within the inactive region.
The ARM assumes that water flow occurs in the active region exclusively. Therefore, it is assumed that the sink and source terms also appear in the active region only and are expressed in the form of
where r aw is the rate of water consumed and supplied in the active region of the soil volume.
Substituting Eqs. (12) to (15) into Eq. (11), dividing both sides by ΔxΔzΔt, taking the limit and rearranging the terms, we obtain (upward positive)
Equation (16) is the governing equation for water flow. Including Darcy’s law in Eq. (16) yields
where K a and h a are the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and the pressure head of the active region, respectively. The h a and K a can be expressed as the functions of θ a (Liu et al. 2005; van Genuchten 1980):
and
where α(1/cm), n and m = 1 − 1/1n are parameters; K s is the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the active region.
Appendix B: Derivation of the governing equation for solute transport
Governing equation for solute transport is also derived using the procedure similar to the soil water flow. According to the mass conservation principle of solute transport, we have
where M in is the solute mass transporting into the soil volume during Δt; M out is the solute mass transporting out from the soil volume during Δt; M inc is the increase of the solute mass stored in the soil volume during Δt; M sk is mass of solute extracted (e.g., plant root, positive) or supplied (e.g., irrigation, negative) from other processes during Δt.
For the one-dimensional transport (upward positive), the solute mass transporting into the soil volume during Δt is expressed as
where J a (transport per unit area per unit time) is the solute flux within the active region in the z-direction, expressed as the sum of convection and dispersion/diffusion as follows
in which c a (mass of solute per volume of soil solution) is the dissolved solute concentration in the active region; D a is the dispersion–diffusion coefficient of the active region.
Similarly, the solute mass leaving from the soil volume during Δt is expressed as
The increase of the mass of solute stored in the soil volume during Δt can be expressed as
where C a and C i are the total concentrations of solute in all forms (including the solute dissolved in soil solution and soil gas, and adsorbed by soil particles) in the active and the inactive regions, respectively. By assuming that the solute only exists in the solid (absorbed by soil particles) and liquid (dissolved in the soil solution) phases, the terms C a and C i can be expressed as
and
where c i (mass of solute per volume of soil solution) is the dissolved solute concentration in the inactive region; s a and s i (mass of sorbent per mass of dry soil) are the absorbed solute concentrations in the active and inactive regions, respectively; ρ b is the soil bulk density.
By assuming that the sink and source terms of solute occur in the active region exclusively, the solute mass extracted (sink, positive) and/or supplied (source, negative) from other processes is expressed as
where c as is the concentration of the sink term of soil water of the active region.
Substituting Eqs. (21) to (27) into Eq. (20), dividing both sides by ΔxΔzΔt, taking the limit and rearranging the terms, we have (upward positive) the following governing equation for solute transport
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheng, F., Wang, K., Zhang, R. et al. Modeling preferential water flow and solute transport in unsaturated soil using the active region model. Environ Earth Sci 62, 1491–1501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0633-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0633-0