Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this technical note was to compare the primary stability and less bone drilling with the help of conventional and trephine drills.
Materials and methods
40 patients were divided into two groups (I & II) of 20 each and group I patients treated with conventional drills and group II with trephine drills. The patients who were reported to dental clinic and research centre between Jan 2011 to june 2011 and who required their teeth replacement with the help of dental implants were included in the study and patients with diabetes, Arthritis and smokers were excluded from the study.
Conclusion
Trephine drills provide better primary stability and good long term results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gapski R et al (2003) Immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implant Res 14:515–527
Marx R (1993) Philosophy and particulars of autogenous bone grafting. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 5:5599–5612
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rai, A., Agrawal, S. & Datarkar, A. Utility of Trephine Drills in Implant Dentistry. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 14, 506–508 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0682-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0682-0