Skip to main content
Log in

The changing of the sponsorship market

The case of Hungarian professional soccer club sponsors

Die Veränderung des Sponsoring-Markts

Am Beispiel der Sponsoren professioneller ungarischer Fußballclubs

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Sportwissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the time of state socialism, Hungarian sport has been totally financed by the state. Therefore, Hungarian soccer and sponsorship market is a relatively new and unexplored subject of research in the field of sports sponsorship, as most studies so far have focused on the major European soccer leagues. The main objective of this paper, focusing on the Hungarian soccer sponsorship market, was to evaluate the range of soccer sponsorship objectives and the range of evaluation tools that sponsors use to measure the effectiveness of their sponsorships. A combined approach of qualitative and quantitative research methods served as the methodological foundation of this study. In the quantitative phase, representatives of the sponsor companies (n=103) were asked to rate the importance of the sponsorship objectives and the importance of the evaluation techniques used to measure the effectiveness of their sponsorships. The results of this study have implications for the sports sponsorship industry, the Hungarian soccer club sponsors, and the sport properties too. According to the research results, many of the Hungarian sponsor companies have failed to assess the effectiveness of sponsorship in meeting their objectives. The research can be used to bridge the gap between the theory and practice of soccer sponsorship in Hungary.

Zusammenfassung

Seit den Zeiten des staatlichen Sozialismus wurde der ungarische Sport vollständig vom Staat finanziert. Daher ist der ungarische Fußball- und Sponsoring-Markt ein relativ neues und wenig untersuchtes Forschungsgebiet im Bereich des Sport-Sponsorings. Denn bisher haben die meisten Studien ihren Fokus auf die führenden Ligen des europäischen Fußballs gerichtet. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Arbeit, die den Schwerpunkt auf den ungarischen Fußballsponsoring-Markt setzt, war es, das Spektrum der Ziele des Fußballsponsorings und der Bewertungsinstrumente zu erfassen, die Sponsoren einsetzen, um die Wirksamkeit ihres Sponsorings zu messen. Ein kombinierter Ansatz aus qualitativen und quantitativen wissenschaftlichen Verfahren diente als methodische Grundlage dieser Studie. In der quantitativen Phase wurden Vertreter der als Sponsoren fungierenden Firmen (n=103) gebeten, die Bedeutung der Ziele des Sponsorings und der zur Messung der Wirksamkeit ihres Sponsorings eingesetzten Bewertungsverfahren einzuschätzen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie haben Auswirkungen auf die Sportsponsoring-Branche, auf die Sponsoren ungarischer Fußballclubs und auch auf die Sporteinrichtungen („sport properties“). Den Forschungsergebnissen zufolge haben viele Sponsoren-Firmen nicht die Wirksamkeit ihres Sponsorings für die Erreichung ihrer Ziele gemessen. Die Ergebnisse können genutzt werden, um die Kluft zwischen Theorie und Praxis des Fußballsponsorings in Ungarn zu überbrücken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. András, K. (2004). Üzleti elemek a sportban, a labdarúgás példáján. Ph.D. Thesis. Budapest: BKÁE.

  2. Bennett, T. & Slack, T. (1999). An analysis of the influence of competitive and institutional pressures on corporate sponsorship decision. Journal of Sport Management, 13, 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bühler, A. W. (2006). Professional Football Sponsorship in the English Premier League and the German Bundesliga, PhD Thesis, University of Plymouth (UK).

  4. Chadwick, S. & Thwaites, D. (2005). Managing Sport Sponsorship Programmes: Lessons from a Critical Assessment of English Soccer. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(3), 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Copeland, R., Frisby, W. & McCarville, R. (1996). Understanding the Sport Sponsorship process from a Corporate Perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 10(1), 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornwell, T. B. & Maignan, I. (1998). Research on Sponsorship: International Review and Appraisal. Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Couvelaere, V. & Richelieu, A. (2005). Brand strategy in Professional Sports: The case of French Soccer Teams. European Sport Management Quarterly, 5(1), 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Currie, N. (2000). Maximising Sport Sponsorship Investments: A Perspective on New and Existing Opportunities. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 2(2), 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deloitte – ‘Deloitte Review of Football Finance’, Retrieved February, 2007, from http://www.deloitte.com.

  10. Deloitte – ‘Deloitte Football Money League’, Retrieved February, 2008, from http://www.deloitte.com

  11. Ferrand, A. & Pages, M. (1996). Image sponsoring: A methodology to match event and sponsor. Journal of Sport Management, 10(3), 278–291.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Földesi, S. G. (1996). A magyar sport átalakulása az 1989-1990-es rendszerváltás után (Transformation of Hungarian Sport following the 1989-1990 Political System Change). In Földesi, S.G. (ed.) A magyar sport szellemi körképe 1990-1995 (Overview on Hungarian Sport between 1990-1995). Budapest: OTSH-MOB.

  13. Földesi, S. G. (2005). Transformation of Sort in Changing Politicall and Economic Systems: The Hungarian Case between 1985–2004. Academic Doctoral Thesis. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

  14. Geng, L., Burton, R. & Blakemore, C. (2002). Sport Sponsorship in China: Transition and Evolution. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11(1), 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heerden, C. H. (2001). Factors affecting decision-making in South African sport sponsorships. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria. Retrieved October 21, 2004, from University of Pretoria, Department of Marketing and Communication Management.

  16. Irwin, R. L. & Assimakopoulos, M. K. (1992). An approach to the evaluation and selection of Sport Sponsorship Proposals. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 1(2), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Javalgi, R., Traylor, M., Cross, A. & Lampman, E. (1994). Awareness of sponsorship and corporate image: an empirical investigation. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kolah, A. (2003). Maximizing the Value of Sponsorship. Sport Business Group Limited Publication.

  19. Kolah, A. (2006). Sponsorship: Strategies for Maximising the Return on Investment. Sport Business Group Limited Publication.

  20. Liu, J., Srivastava, A. & Seng Woo, H. (1998). Transference of skills between sports and business. Journal of European Industrial Training, 22(3), 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lough, N. L. & Irwin, R. L. (2001). A comparative analysis of Sponsorship objectives. For U.S. Women’s Sport and traditional Sport Sponsorship. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 10(4), 202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McCarville, R. & Copeland, B. (1994). Understanding sport sponsorship through exchange theory. Journal of Sport Management, 8(3), 102-114.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McCook, K., Turco, D. & Riley, R. (1997). A look at the Corporate Sponsorship Decision-Making Process. The Cyber-Journal of Sport Marketing, 1(2), Retrieved August, 2004, from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/nph-arch/O1998-Mar-12//http://ww.cad.gu.edu.au/cjsm/mcook.html.

  24. Meenaghan, T. (1991). The Role of Sponsorship in the Marketing Mix. International Journal of Advertising, 10(1), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mullin, B. J., Hardy, S. & Sutton, W. A. (2000). Sport marketing (2edn.). Human Kinetics Publishers, USA.

  26. Pope, N. K. & Voges, K. (1994). Sponsorship Evaluation: does it match the motive and the mechanism? Sport Marketing Quarterly, 3(4), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pope, N. K. (1998). Overview of Current Sponsorship Thought. The Cyber-Journal of Sport Marketing, 2(1), Retrieved October, 2004, from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/npharch/O1998Mar12//http://www.cad.gu.edu.au/cjsm /pope21.htm.

  28. Shank, M. D. (1999). Sports Marketing – a strategic perspective. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

  29. Sandler, D. M. & Shani, D. (1993). Sponsorship and the Olympic Games: the consumer perspective. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2(3), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sponsor Map 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006, from http://www.sponsormap.com.

  31. Sport + Markt (2006). European Jersey Report. Retrieved January 5, 2007, from http://www.sponsorshipnews.com/svga/archive.cfm?id=1434.

  32. Stotlar, D. (1993). Sponsorship and the Olympic Winter Games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2(1), 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stotlar, D. K. (2001). Developing successful sport sponsorship plans. Morgantown WV, Fitness Information Technologies.

  34. Stotlar, D. K. (2004). Sponsorship evaluation: moving from theory to practice. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(1), 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Berkes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkes, P., Nyerges, M. & Váczi, J. The changing of the sponsorship market. Sportwiss 39, 35–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-009-0005-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-009-0005-7

Keywords

Navigation