Abstract
Prediction of students' performance has been reported as a vital task which enables educators to take necessary actions to improve students’ learning. Numerous studies have concluded that students with lower procrastination tendencies archive more compared to those with higher procrastination tendencies. In this study, a new method is proposed to predict students’ procrastination tendencies discerned from their submission behavioural patterns in online learning. In this method, feature vectors signifying students’ submission patterns on homework are firstly drafted. Next, an ensemble clustering method is employed to optimally sort students into various categories of procrastination: procrastinator, procrastinator candidate, and non-procrastinator. Lastly, various classification methods are assessed to discern which one best predicts students’ procrastination tendencies. The efficacy of this approach is assessed through the data from a course comprised of 242 students at the University of Tartu in Estonia. Our study found that our method correctly identifies student procrastination from submission pattern data with 97% accuracy, and that the best performing classifier is linear support vector machine. Investigating the effect of different number of features (homework) on performance of clustering and classification methods indicate that finding the optimal number of feature to use in both clustering and classification methods is a vital task as it could potentially affect prediction power of our approach. More specifically, the results show that in our proposed approach, unlike clustering methods that show a better performance with lower number of features, classification methods mostly tend to show a better performance with larger number of features.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu Tair MM, El-Halees AM (2012) Mining educational data to improve students’ performance: a case study. Min Educ Data Improve Stud Perform Case Study 2
Ackerman DS, Gross BL (2005) My instructor made me do it: task characteristics of procrastination. J Mark Educ 27:5–13
Ahmad F, Ismail NH, Aziz AA (2015) The prediction of students’ academic performance using classification data mining techniques
Akram A, Fu C, Li Y et al (2019) Predicting students’ academic procrastination in blended learning course using homework submission data. IEEE Access 7:102487–102498. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930867
Azevedo R, Cromley JG, Winters FI et al (2005) Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instr Sci 33:381–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
Burgos C, Campanario ML, de la Peña D, Lara JA, Lizcano D, Martínez MA (2018) Data mining for modeling students’ performance: a tutoring action plan to prevent academic dropout. Comput Electr Eng 66:541–556
Cerezo R, Esteban M, Sánchez-Santillán M, Núñez JC (2017) Procrastinating behavior in computer-based learning environments to predict performance: a case study in Moodle. Front Psychol 8:1403
Cerezo R, Sánchez-Santillán M, Paule-Ruiz MP, Núñez JC (2016) Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: a case study in higher education. Comput Educ 96:42–54
Devasia T, Vinushree T, Hegde V (2016) Prediction of students performance using educational data mining. In: IEEE, pp 91–95
Díaz-Morales JF, Ferrari JR, Cohen JR (2008) Indecision and avoidant procrastination: the role of morningness—eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles. J Gen Psychol 135:228–240
Drăgulescu B, Bucos M, Vasiu R (2015) Predicting assignment submissions in a multi-class classification problem. TEM J 4:244
Dutt A, Ismail MA, Herawan T (2017) A systematic review on educational data mining. IEEE Access 5:15991–16005
Elvers GC, Polzella DJ, Graetz K (2003) Procrastination in online courses: performance and attitudinal differences. Teach Psychol 30:159–162
Ferrari JR (2011) AARP still procrastinating? The no-regrets guide to getting it done. Wiley, New York
Garrison DR, Kanuka H (2004) Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ 7:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gates AJ, Wood IB, Hetrick WP, Ahn YY (2017) On comparing clusterings: an element-centric framework unifies overlaps and hierarchy
Gates AJ, Wood IB, Hetrick WP, Ahn Y-Y (2019) Element-centric clustering comparison unifies overlaps and hierarchy. Sci Rep 9:8574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44892-y
Graff M (2019) Self-efficacy beliefs and academic procrastination. N Am J Psychol 21(1)
Hellas A, Ihantola P, Petersen A et al (2018) Predicting academic performance: a systematic literature review. pp 175–199
Hooshyar D, Kori K, Pedaste M, Bardone E (2019) The potential of open learner models to promote active thinking by enhancing self-regulated learning in online higher education learning environments. Br J Educ Technol 50:2365–2386. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12826
Hooshyar D, Pedaste M, Yang Y (2020) Mining educational data to predict students’ performance through procrastination behavior. Entropy 22:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22010012
Huang S, Fang N (2013) Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: a comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models. Comput Educ 61:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.015
Hyppönen L, Hirsto L, Sointu E (2019) Perspectives on University students’ self-regulated learning, task-avoidance, time management and achievement in a flipped classroom context. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res
Kleinberg JM (2003) An impossibility theorem for clustering. In: Becker S, Thrun S, Obermayer K (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 15. MIT Press, New York, pp 463–470
Li C, Yoo J (2006) Modeling student online learning using clustering. pp 186–191
Marbouti F, Diefes-Dux HA, Madhavan K (2016) Models for early prediction of at-risk students in a course using standards-based grading. Comput Educ 103:1–15
Michinov N, Brunot S, Le Bohec O et al (2011) Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Comput Educ 56:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025
Mohamad SK, Tasir Z (2013) Educational data mining: a review. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 97:320–324
Nayak, S. G. (2019). Impact of procrastination and time-management on academic stress among undergraduate nursing students: a cross sectional study. Int J Caring Sci 12(3)
Olivé DM, Huynh DQ, Reynolds M et al (2019) A quest for a one-size-fits-all neural network: early prediction of students at risk in online courses. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 12:171–183
Pedaste M, Sarapuu T (2006) Developing an effective support system for inquiry learning in a web-based environment. J Comput Assist Learn 22:47–62
Peel L, Larremore DB, Clauset A (2017) The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks. Sci Adv 3:e1602548. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602548
Richardson M, Abraham C, Bond R (2012) Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 138(2):353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Rodriguez MZ, Comin CH, Casanova D, Bruno OM, Amancio DR, Costa LDF, Rodrigues FA (2019) Clustering algorithms: a comparative approach. PLoS ONE 14(1):e0210236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210236
Romero C, Ventura S (2007) Educational data mining: a survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Syst Appl 33:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.005
Romero C, Ventura S (2010) Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40:601–618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2053532
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25:54–67
Schraw G, Wadkins T, Olafson L (2007) Doing the things we do: a grounded theory of academic procrastination. J Educ Psychol 99:12
Slater S, Joksimović S, Kovanovic V, Baker RS, Gasevic D (2017) Tools for educational data mining: a review. J Educ Behav Stat 42(1):85–106
Steel P, Klingsieck KB (2016) Academic procrastination: psychological antecedents revisited. Aust Psychol 51(1):36–46
Tomasevic N, Gvozdenovic N, Vranes S (2020) An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction. Comput Educ 143:103676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676
Tuckman BW (2005) Relations of academic procrastination, rationalizations, and performance in a web course with deadlines. Psychol Rep 96:1015–1021
Visser L, Korthagen F, Schoonenboom J (2015a) Influences on and consequences of academic procrastination of first-year student teachers. Pedagog Stud 92:394–412
Visser RM, Kunze AE, Westhoff B et al (2015b) Representational similarity analysis offers a preview of the noradrenergic modulation of long-term fear memory at the time of encoding. Psychoneuroendocrinology 55:8–20
Wighting MJ, Liu J, Rovai AP (2008) Distinguishing sense of community and motivation characteristics between online and traditional college students. Q Rev Distance Educ 9
Yang Y, Hooshyar D, Jo J, Lim H (2018) A group preference-based item similarity model: comparison of clustering techniques in ambient and context-aware recommender systems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1–9
You JW (2012) The relationship among academic procrastination, self-regulated learning, fear, academic self-efficacy, and perceived academic control in e-learning. J Educ Inf Media 18:249–271
Acknowledgements
This research was partly supported by the European Regional Development Fund through the University of Tartu project ASTRA per ASPERA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M. et al. Prediction of students’ procrastination behaviour through their submission behavioural pattern in online learning. J Ambient Intell Human Comput (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02041-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02041-8