Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of students’ procrastination behaviour through their submission behavioural pattern in online learning

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of students' performance has been reported as a vital task which enables educators to take necessary actions to improve students’ learning. Numerous studies have concluded that students with lower procrastination tendencies archive more compared to those with higher procrastination tendencies. In this study, a new method is proposed to predict students’ procrastination tendencies discerned from their submission behavioural patterns in online learning. In this method, feature vectors signifying students’ submission patterns on homework are firstly drafted. Next, an ensemble clustering method is employed to optimally sort students into various categories of procrastination: procrastinator, procrastinator candidate, and non-procrastinator. Lastly, various classification methods are assessed to discern which one best predicts students’ procrastination tendencies. The efficacy of this approach is assessed through the data from a course comprised of 242 students at the University of Tartu in Estonia. Our study found that our method correctly identifies student procrastination from submission pattern data with 97% accuracy, and that the best performing classifier is linear support vector machine. Investigating the effect of different number of features (homework) on performance of clustering and classification methods indicate that finding the optimal number of feature to use in both clustering and classification methods is a vital task as it could potentially affect prediction power of our approach. More specifically, the results show that in our proposed approach, unlike clustering methods that show a better performance with lower number of features, classification methods mostly tend to show a better performance with larger number of features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu Tair MM, El-Halees AM (2012) Mining educational data to improve students’ performance: a case study. Min Educ Data Improve Stud Perform Case Study 2

  • Ackerman DS, Gross BL (2005) My instructor made me do it: task characteristics of procrastination. J Mark Educ 27:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad F, Ismail NH, Aziz AA (2015) The prediction of students’ academic performance using classification data mining techniques

  • Akram A, Fu C, Li Y et al (2019) Predicting students’ academic procrastination in blended learning course using homework submission data. IEEE Access 7:102487–102498. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo R, Cromley JG, Winters FI et al (2005) Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instr Sci 33:381–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgos C, Campanario ML, de la Peña D, Lara JA, Lizcano D, Martínez MA (2018) Data mining for modeling students’ performance: a tutoring action plan to prevent academic dropout. Comput Electr Eng 66:541–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo R, Esteban M, Sánchez-Santillán M, Núñez JC (2017) Procrastinating behavior in computer-based learning environments to predict performance: a case study in Moodle. Front Psychol 8:1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerezo R, Sánchez-Santillán M, Paule-Ruiz MP, Núñez JC (2016) Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: a case study in higher education. Comput Educ 96:42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devasia T, Vinushree T, Hegde V (2016) Prediction of students performance using educational data mining. In: IEEE, pp 91–95

  • Díaz-Morales JF, Ferrari JR, Cohen JR (2008) Indecision and avoidant procrastination: the role of morningness—eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles. J Gen Psychol 135:228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drăgulescu B, Bucos M, Vasiu R (2015) Predicting assignment submissions in a multi-class classification problem. TEM J 4:244

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt A, Ismail MA, Herawan T (2017) A systematic review on educational data mining. IEEE Access 5:15991–16005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvers GC, Polzella DJ, Graetz K (2003) Procrastination in online courses: performance and attitudinal differences. Teach Psychol 30:159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari JR (2011) AARP still procrastinating? The no-regrets guide to getting it done. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison DR, Kanuka H (2004) Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ 7:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates AJ, Wood IB, Hetrick WP, Ahn YY (2017) On comparing clusterings: an element-centric framework unifies overlaps and hierarchy

  • Gates AJ, Wood IB, Hetrick WP, Ahn Y-Y (2019) Element-centric clustering comparison unifies overlaps and hierarchy. Sci Rep 9:8574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44892-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graff M (2019) Self-efficacy beliefs and academic procrastination. N Am J Psychol 21(1)

  • Hellas A, Ihantola P, Petersen A et al (2018) Predicting academic performance: a systematic literature review. pp 175–199

  • Hooshyar D, Kori K, Pedaste M, Bardone E (2019) The potential of open learner models to promote active thinking by enhancing self-regulated learning in online higher education learning environments. Br J Educ Technol 50:2365–2386. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooshyar D, Pedaste M, Yang Y (2020) Mining educational data to predict students’ performance through procrastination behavior. Entropy 22:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22010012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Fang N (2013) Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: a comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models. Comput Educ 61:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyppönen L, Hirsto L, Sointu E (2019) Perspectives on University students’ self-regulated learning, task-avoidance, time management and achievement in a flipped classroom context. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res

  • Kleinberg JM (2003) An impossibility theorem for clustering. In: Becker S, Thrun S, Obermayer K (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 15. MIT Press, New York, pp 463–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Yoo J (2006) Modeling student online learning using clustering. pp 186–191

  • Marbouti F, Diefes-Dux HA, Madhavan K (2016) Models for early prediction of at-risk students in a course using standards-based grading. Comput Educ 103:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michinov N, Brunot S, Le Bohec O et al (2011) Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Comput Educ 56:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad SK, Tasir Z (2013) Educational data mining: a review. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 97:320–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, S. G. (2019). Impact of procrastination and time-management on academic stress among undergraduate nursing students: a cross sectional study. Int J Caring Sci 12(3)

  • Olivé DM, Huynh DQ, Reynolds M et al (2019) A quest for a one-size-fits-all neural network: early prediction of students at risk in online courses. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 12:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedaste M, Sarapuu T (2006) Developing an effective support system for inquiry learning in a web-based environment. J Comput Assist Learn 22:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peel L, Larremore DB, Clauset A (2017) The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks. Sci Adv 3:e1602548. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson M, Abraham C, Bond R (2012) Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 138(2):353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez MZ, Comin CH, Casanova D, Bruno OM, Amancio DR, Costa LDF, Rodrigues FA (2019) Clustering algorithms: a comparative approach. PLoS ONE 14(1):e0210236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero C, Ventura S (2007) Educational data mining: a survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Syst Appl 33:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero C, Ventura S (2010) Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40:601–618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2053532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw G, Wadkins T, Olafson L (2007) Doing the things we do: a grounded theory of academic procrastination. J Educ Psychol 99:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater S, Joksimović S, Kovanovic V, Baker RS, Gasevic D (2017) Tools for educational data mining: a review. J Educ Behav Stat 42(1):85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel P, Klingsieck KB (2016) Academic procrastination: psychological antecedents revisited. Aust Psychol 51(1):36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasevic N, Gvozdenovic N, Vranes S (2020) An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction. Comput Educ 143:103676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman BW (2005) Relations of academic procrastination, rationalizations, and performance in a web course with deadlines. Psychol Rep 96:1015–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser L, Korthagen F, Schoonenboom J (2015a) Influences on and consequences of academic procrastination of first-year student teachers. Pedagog Stud 92:394–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser RM, Kunze AE, Westhoff B et al (2015b) Representational similarity analysis offers a preview of the noradrenergic modulation of long-term fear memory at the time of encoding. Psychoneuroendocrinology 55:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wighting MJ, Liu J, Rovai AP (2008) Distinguishing sense of community and motivation characteristics between online and traditional college students. Q Rev Distance Educ 9

  • Yang Y, Hooshyar D, Jo J, Lim H (2018) A group preference-based item similarity model: comparison of clustering techniques in ambient and context-aware recommender systems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1–9

  • You JW (2012) The relationship among academic procrastination, self-regulated learning, fear, academic self-efficacy, and perceived academic control in e-learning. J Educ Inf Media 18:249–271

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly supported by the European Regional Development Fund through the University of Tartu project ASTRA per ASPERA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heuiseok Lim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M. et al. Prediction of students’ procrastination behaviour through their submission behavioural pattern in online learning. J Ambient Intell Human Comput (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02041-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02041-8

Keywords

Navigation