Abstract
Whereas life cycle assessment (LCA) is more and more used for assessing the environmental load of waste management systems and of biomass production and valorization systems, various scientific issues are still to be dealt with. The purpose of this paper is to enlighten these scientific issues and to describe the current attempt to overcome them. The method used has been to go through the steps of the LCA standardized framework (ISO 14040) and to outline at each step the points that could be improved and still deserve research efforts. The various identified issues are: in step 1 (goal and scope), the choice of attributional/consequential modelling, the difficult choice of the functional unit due to the highly multi-functional nature of such systems, the allocation choices and the need for spatial differentiation; in step 2 (inventory), the thorny issue of modelling such complex systems and properly estimating field emissions; in step 3 (impact assessment), the lack of appropriate impacts (such as odours) in current LCA impact categories; in step 4 (interpretation and use), research efforts are needed to understand and facilitate the way actors take over and use LCA multi-criteria results. A transversal issue, i.e. uncertainty characterization and reduction, is also analyzed. These various scientific bottlenecks are currently under study; some are handled by this “Waste and Biomass Valorization” special topic, which includes a selection of papers presented in 2011 at the Ecotech&Tools conference (Montpellier, France).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
EC: Guidance on the interpretation of key provisions of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. European Commission, DG Environment, p. 74 (2012)
Manfredi, S., Pant, R.: Supporting environmentally sound decisions for waste management: a technical guide to life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for waste experts and LCA practitioners. In: EUR 24916 EN—2011, p. 197. European Commission—JRC-IES (Institute for Environmental Sustainability), Ispra, IT (2011)
Kirkeby, J.T., Birgisdottir, H., Bhander, G.S., Hauschild, M., Christensen, T.H.: Modelling of environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling within the life-cycle analysis program EASEWASTE. Waste Manage. 27(7), 961–970 (2007)
Bellon-Maurel, V., Bessou, C., Junqua, G., Lardon, L., Loiseau, E., Macombe, L., Risch, E., Roux, P.: Applying life cycle assessment to complex biosystems: which fronts of science? Annales des Mines - Responsabilité et Environnement Avril 66, 35–41 (2012)
Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., Bras, B.: A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13(4), 290–300 (2008)
Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., Bras, B.: A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13(5), 374–388 (2008)
Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T., Rydberg, T.: Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(1), 90–96 (2011)
Ekvall, T., Weidema, B.: System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 9(3), 161–171 (2004). doi:10.1007/bf02994190
Ekvall, T., Tillman, A.-M., Molander, S.: Normative ethics and methodology for life cycle assessment. J Clean. Prod. 13(13–14), 1225–1234 (2005)
Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.P., Suh, S., Weidema, B.P., Pennington, D.W.: Life cycle assessment: part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ. Int. 30(5), 701–720 (2004)
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., Suh, S.: Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 91(1), 1–21 (2009)
Tillman, A.M.: Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 20, 113–123 (2000)
Heijungs, R., Guinée, J.B.: Allocation and ‘what-if’ scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Manage. 27(8), 997–1005 (2007)
Diaz, R., Warith, M.: Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid wastes: development of the WASTED model. Waste Manage. 26(8), 886–901 (2006)
Ekvall, T., Assefa, G., Björklund, A., Eriksson, O., Finnveden, G.: What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manage. 27(8), 989–996 (2007)
Potting, J., Hauschild, M.: Part II: spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2(4), 209–216 (1997). doi:10.1007/bf02978417
Chiueh, P.-T., Lo, S.-L., Chang, C.-L.: A GIS-based system for allocating municipal solid waste incinerator compensatory fund. Waste Manage. 28(12), 2690–2701 (2008)
Suh, S., Nakamura, S.: Five years in the area of input-output and hybrid LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12(6), 351–352 (2007)
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G.J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., Munksgaard, J., Norris, G.: System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(3), 657–664 (2004)
Heinonen, J., Kyrö, R., Junnila, S.: Dense downtown living more carbon intense due to higher consumption: a case study of Helsinki. Environ. Res. Lett. 6(3), 9 (2011)
Ekvall, T., Assefa, G., Björklund, A., Eriksson, O., Finnveden, G.: What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manage. (Oxf.) 27(8), 989–996 (2007)
Collet, P., Hélias, A., Lardon, L., Steyer, J.P.: Time and life-cycle assessment: how to take time into account in the inventory step? In: Finkbeiner, M. (ed.) Towards Life Cycle Sustainibility Management, pp. 119–130. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Cerceau, J., Junqua, G., Gonzalez, C., Lopez-Ferber, M., Mat, N.: Industrial ecology and the building of territorial knowledge: DEPART, a French Research Action Program Implemented in Harbor Territories, 13–15 January 2012, oral communication. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Business Innovation & Technology Management International Conference, Pattaya, Thailand
Junqua, G., Moine, H.: Utilisation de l’écologie industrielle et de l’intelligence économique territoriale pour le développement durable d’une Zone Industrialo-Portuaire. Déchets Sciences et Techniques 46, 19–23 (2007)
IPCC: Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. (eds.) National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, Japan (2006)
Langevin, B., Lardon, L., Basset-Mens, C.: The use of models to account for the variability to agricultural data. In: Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management. Berlin, GE, pp. 301–308 (2011)
Bellon-Maurel, V., Clermidy, S., Sinfort, C., Ojeda, H., Roux, P.: Life cycle assessment: an exhaustive method for assessing environmental impacts of crop management practices in agriculture. Progrès agricole et viticole. 129(20), 474–481 (2012)
Núñez, M., Civit, B., Muñoz, P., Arena, A.P., Rieradevall, J., Antón, A.: Assessing potential desertification environmental impact in life cycle assessment: part 1: methodological aspects. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15(1), 67–78 (2010)
Pfister, S., Koehler, A., Hellweg, S.: Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(11), 4098–4104 (2009)
Potting, J., Hauschild, M.Z.: Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment: a decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11, 11–13 (2006)
Rosenbaum, R.K., Bachmann, T.M., Gold, L.S., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Koehler, A., Larsen, H.F., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., McKone, T.E., Payet, J., Schuhmacher, M., Van De Meent, D., Hauschild, M.Z.: USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13(7), 532–546 (2008)
McDougall, F.R., White, P.R., Franke, M., Hindle, P., 9780632058891, Hardback, F., P.d.M.: Integrated Waste Management, 2nd revised edition ed. Wiley, Oxford (2001)
Björklund, A.: Life cycle assessment as an analytical tool in strategic environmental assessment. Lessons learned from a case study on municipal energy planning in Sweden. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 32(1), 82–87 (2011)
Tillman, A.M.: Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 20(1), 113–123 (2000)
Gentil, E.C., Damgaard, A., Hauschild, M., Finnveden, G., Eriksson, O., Thorneloe, S., Kaplan, P.O., Barlaz, M., Muller, O., Matsui, Y., Ii, R., Christensen, T.H.: Models for waste life cycle assessment: review of technical assumptions. Waste Manage. (Oxf.) 30(12), 2636–2648 (2010)
Tan, R.R., Culaba, A.B., Purvis, M.R.I.: Application of possibility theory in the life-cycle inventory assessment of biofuels. Int. J. Energy Res. 26(8), 737–745 (2002)
Von Bahr, B., Steen, B.: Reducing epistemological uncertainty in life cycle inventory. J. Clean. Prod. 12(4), 369–388 (2004)
Halog, A.B., Bichraoui, N.: An integrated assessment framework for developing a sustainable forest-based eco-industrial network. Waste Biomass Valoriz. (in press) (2013)
Pradel, M., Pacaud, T., Cariolle, M.: Valorization of organic wastes through agricultural fertilization: coupling models to assess the effects of spreader performances on nitrogenous emissions and related environmental impacts. Waste Biomass Valoriz. (2012)
Dufossé, K., Gabrielle, B., Drouet, J.L., Bessou, C.: Using agroecosystem modeling to improve the estimates of N2O emissions in the lifecycle assessment of biofuels. Waste and Biomass Valoriz. (in press) (2013)
Marchand, M., Aissani, L., Mallard, P., Béline, F., Réveret, J.P.: Odour and life cycle assessment (LCA) in waste management: a local assessment proposal. Waste Biomass Valoriz. (2012)
Schlierf, K., Aissani, L., Mery, J.: The incorporation of results of non-aggregated life cycle assessment in decision making: evidence from a case study in local waste management in France. Waste Biomass Valoriz. (2012)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the other members of ELSA pole for their advice and suggestions. We are also grateful to the Languedoc Roussillon for its financial support and to Interreg Sudoe (Ecotech-Suode project) for its funding in LCA research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bellon-Maurel, V., Aissani, L., Bessou, C. et al. What Scientific Issues in Life Cycle Assessment Applied to Waste and Biomass Valorization? Editorial. Waste Biomass Valor 4, 377–383 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-012-9189-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-012-9189-4