Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intermodal Mobility

  • Catchword
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Aditjandra PT, Nelson JD, Wright SD (2009) A multi-modal international journey planning system: a case study of WISETRIP. In: 16th ITS world congress and exhibition on intelligent transport systems and services

  • Arnott R, Inci E (2006) An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion. J Urban Econ 60(3):418–442. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R, Small K (1994) The economics of traffic congestion. Am Sci 82(5):446–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Barter P (2013) Cars are parked 95% of the time. http://www.reinventingparking.org/2013/02/cars-are-parked-95-of-time-lets-check.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2017

  • Barth M, Boriboonsomsin K (2008) Real-world carbon dioxide impacts of traffic congestion. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2058:163–171. doi:10.3141/2058-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk R (2014) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67(8):1595–1600. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beutel MC, Gokay S, Kluth W, Krempels K-H, Samsel C, Terwelp C (2014a) Product oriented integration of heterogeneous mobility services. In: IEEE 17th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pp 1529–1534

  • Beutel MC, Samsel C, Mensing M, Krempels K-H (2014b) Business model framework to provide heterogeneous mobility services on virtual markets. In: 11th international conference on E-business, pp 145–151

  • Bidan M, Rowe F, Truex D (2012) An empirical study of IS architectures in French SMEs: integration approaches. Eur J Inf Syst 21(3):287–302. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birth O, Hoffmann M, Strassberger M, Roor R, Schlichter J (2015) Concept for an intermodal traveller information system with real-time data using complex event processing. In: IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems – (ITSC 2015), pp 2293–2298

  • Buchinger U, Lindmark S, Braet O (2013) Business model scenarios for an open service platform for multi-modal electric vehicle sharing. In: SMART: the second international conference on smart systems, devices and technologies, pp 7–14

  • Christensen M, Shaheen SA (2014) Is the future of urban mobility multi-modal and digitized transportation access? http://www.newcitiesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/PDF/Research/Cities-on-the-move/Is-the-future-of-urban-mobility-multi-modal-and-digitized-transportation-access-Susan-Shaheen-Matthew-Christensen-New-Cities-Foundation-Cities-On-The-Move.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2015

  • Di Dio S, Lo Casto B, Micari F, Rizzo G, Vinci I (2015) Mobility, data, and behavior: the TrafficO2 case study. In: Vesco A, Ferrero F (eds) Handbook of research on social, economic, and environmental sustainability in the development of smart cities. IGI Global, pp 382–406

  • European Commission (2013) Multimodal personal mobility. https://eu-smartcities.eu/sites/all/files/Multimodal%20personal%20mobility%20january.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2016

  • Firnkorn J, Müller M (2011) What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecol Econ 70(8):1519–1528. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2016) Show me the way to go home: an empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Q (forthcoming)

  • Grotenhuis J-W, Wiegmans BW, Rietveld P (2007) The desired quality of integrated multimodal travel information in public transport: customer needs for time and effort savings. Transp Policy 14(1):27–38. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2015) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. doi:10.1002/asi.23552

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon S, Lyons G (2003) The value of integrated multimodal traveller information and its potential contribution to modal change. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 6(1):1–21. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00035-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisson C, Michalk W, Görlitz R (2015) Evaluating services in mobility markets: a business model approach. In: Görlitz R, Bertsch V, Caton S, Feldmann N, Jochem P, Maleshkova M, Reuter-Oppermann M (eds) Proceedings of the first Karlsruhe service summit workshop – advances in service research. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukopoulos P, Jakobsson C, Gärling T, Schneider CM, Fujii S (2005) Public attitudes towards policy measures for reducing private car use: evidence from a study in Sweden. Environ Sci Policy 8(1):57–66. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx R, Mello AMD, Zilbovicius M, Lara FFD (2015) Spatial contexts and firm strategies: applying the multilevel perspective to sustainable urban mobility transitions in Brazil. J Clean Prod 108(Part A):1092–1104. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuch N, Lützenberger M, Keiser J (2013) An open extensible platform for intermodal mobility assistance. Procedia Comput Sci 19:396–403. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.06.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta G, Sacco D, Ma T, You L, Liu K (2015) Personal mobility service system in urban areas: the IRMA project. In: IEEE symposium on service-oriented system engineering (SOSE), pp 88–97

  • Müller G, Riley P, Asperges T, Puig-Pey P (2004) Towards passenger intermodality in the EU, recommendations for advancing passenger intermodality in the EU. European Commission, Dortmund

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobis C (2007) Multimodality: facets and causes of sustainable mobility behavior. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2010:35–44. doi:10.3141/2010-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue J-P, Comtois C, Slack B (2013) The geography of transport systems, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen S, Guzman S, Zhang H (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2143:159–167. doi:10.3141/2143-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spickermann A, Grienitz V, von der Gracht Heiko A (2014) Heading towards a multimodal city of the future? Technol Forecast Soc Change 89:201–221. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SteadieSeifi M, Dellaert NP, Nuijten W, van Woensel T, Raoufi R (2014) Multimodal freight transportation planning: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 233(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser M, Weiner N, Albayrak S (2015) The potential of interconnected service marketplaces for future mobility. Comput Electr Eng 45:169–181. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teubner T, Flath CM (2015) The economics of multi-hop ride sharing. Bus Inf Syst Eng. doi:10.1007/s12599-015-0396-y

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights

  • US Department of Transportation (2011) 2009 national household travel survey. http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2016

  • van Nes R, Bovy P (2004) Multimodal traveling and its impact on urban transit network design. J Adv Transp 38(3):225–241. doi:10.1002/atr.5670380302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicke GA (1999) Electronic markets – a key to mobility. Electron Mark 9(3):162–168. doi:10.1080/101967899359058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willing C, Gust G, Brandt T, Schmidt S, Neumann D (2016) Enhancing municipal analytics capabilities to enable sustainable urban transportation. In: Proceedings of the 24th European conference on information systems (ECIS)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Kollegiengebäude II, Platz der Alten Synagoge, 79098, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

    Christoph Willing &  Dirk Neumann

  2. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Mandeville (T) Building, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Tobias Brandt

Authors
  1. Christoph Willing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tobias Brandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dirk Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Willing.

Additional information

Accepted after two revisions by the editors of the special issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willing, C., Brandt, T. & Neumann, D. Intermodal Mobility. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59, 173–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0471-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0471-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation