Skip to main content
Log in

Electronic Word of Mouth

  • Catchword
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arndt J (1967) Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research 4(3):291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Herwig S, PöppelbußJ, Tiebe D (2009) Funktionale Gestaltungsoptionen von Online-Bewertungssystemen. In: Proceedings of GI Jahrestagung, pp 2098–2112

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43(3):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science 49(10):407–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorne W (2010) Speak now or forever hold your tweets. Two in five say they aim to influence others when they express their preferences online. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/Insights/HarrisVault.aspx. Accessed 2013-07-03

  • Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(1):38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF (1964) Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney SM (1995) Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory study. Journal of Marketing 59(2):71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappe M, Kracklauer A (2007) Verkaufschance Web 2.0: Dialoge fördern, Absätze steigern, neue Märkte erschließen. GWV Fachverlage, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Lis B (2013) In eWOM We Trust. Ein Modell zur Erklärung der Glaubwürdigkeit von eWOM. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 55(3):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Homburg C (2007) Neglected outcomes of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing 71(2):133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Li D (2010) Effects of aggregate rating on eWOM acceptance: an attribution theory perspective. In: PACIS 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T, Coyle JR, Lightfoot E, Scott A (2007) Reconsidering models of influence: the relationship between consumer social networks and word-of-mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research 47(4):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, Menon S, Sivakumar K (2005) Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing 19(3):15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Neßler.

Additional information

Accepted after two revisions by Prof. Dr. Sinz.

This article is also available in German in print and via http://www.wirtschaftsinformatik.de: Lis B, Neßler C (2014) Digitale Mundpropoganda. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK. doi: 10.1007/s11576-013-0398-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lis, B., Neßler, C. Electronic Word of Mouth. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6, 63–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0306-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0306-0

Keywords

Navigation